
Back to: Largo, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 62.
250 1ST AVE NE
Largo, FL 33770
Other nearby schools ratings:
Largo Central Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Pinellas County:  51  Largo:  46  Largo Central Elementary School:  62 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Largo, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (727) 5883566 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2061
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 5884653
Principal: Angelean Bing
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 54
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://www.largocentes.pinellas.k12.fl.us
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  86%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  79%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  80%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  62%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  71%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  61%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  49%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  553  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: NO
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  24%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  38%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 364 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 365 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 358
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 355
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 356
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 234 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 230
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 230
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 81
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 31
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  88%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  79%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  49%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  81%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  72%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  78%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  75%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  608  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  16%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  37%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 372 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 372 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 350
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 359
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 350
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 231 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 231 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 226
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 219
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 226
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 219
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 45
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 57
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  78%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  80%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  73%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  47%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  68%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  76%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  63%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  552  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  59%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  32%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 184
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 184
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 137 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 137 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 128
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 128
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 119 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 109
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 109
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  82%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  78%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  87%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  54%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  84%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  75%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  90%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  74%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  624  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  56%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  31%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 195 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 195 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 174
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  78%  State average from 643 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  72%  State average from 643 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  70%  State average from 643 schools:  81% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  50%  State average from 643 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsHere:  58%  State average from 643 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  61%  State average from 643 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  389  State average from 643 schools:  420 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 643 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  56%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  26%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 206 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 206 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 67
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 194
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 195
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 49
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 146
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 147
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 15
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 34
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 107
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 108
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  73%  State average from 631 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  70%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  82%  State average from 631 schools:  80% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  67%  State average from 631 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  75%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  55%  State average from 631 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  422  State average from 631 schools:  417 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 631 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  57%  State average from 631 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  24%  State average from 631 schools:  52% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1467  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  328  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  39%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  80%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1671  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  335  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  37%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  11%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  82%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1779  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  333  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  35%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  40%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  86%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1821  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  31%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14%  State average:  9% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  77%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  14%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  62%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1494  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  342  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  37%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  13%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  84%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1619  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  337  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  33%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  78%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1734  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  347  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  23%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  28%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  71%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1839  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  348  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  23%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  75%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1504  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1751  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  349  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 01%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1724  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1806  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1573  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  359  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1606  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1676  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1831  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  346  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 122
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 85%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1366  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1522  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1628  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1822  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1402  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  322  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1583  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1749  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  350  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1878  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  357  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  633  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Literary (max 18)LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  12  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  647  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Functional (max 18)LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  670  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
Critical Analysis (max 12)LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  689  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Literary (max 18)LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 56
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  287  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 68%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1285  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1548  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1590  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1464  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 126
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1715  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007LARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1722  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1596  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 126
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1361  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1524  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1574  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1477  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 96
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1698  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1705  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1548  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 157
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 60
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  622  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 75
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  647  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 62
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  679  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 59
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  623  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 75
Mean Scale ScoreLARGO CENTRAL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  655  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 63
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  681  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 70
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  297  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 63%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 77%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 67%
