Laurel Nokomis School in Nokomis, Florida (FL) - Test Results, Rating, Ranking, Grades, Scores, Classes, Enrollment, Teachers, Students, and Report Card

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 87.

1900 E LAUREL RD
Nokomis, FL 34275

Show street view No street view available for this location

Other nearby schools ratings:

Coastal Behavioral Healthcare Residential Treatment Center School (15.3 miles):	92
Laurel Nokomis School:	87
Garden Elementary School (4.4 miles):	79
L. A. Ainger Middle School (17.7 miles):	67
Lamarque Elementary School (15.0 miles):	60
Sarasota Of Arts/Sciences School (15.8 miles):	50
Brentwood Elementary School (12.3 miles):	39
Children's Haven School (17.1 miles):	23
Oak Park School (9.5 miles):	0

Laurel Nokomis School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	45
Sarasota County:	48
Nokomis:	85
Laurel Nokomis School:	87

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum

Phone: (941) 486-2171 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 58
School number: 1211
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: SARASOTA
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 486-2013
Principal: Nancy F Dubin
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 70
Senate District: 23
School Web Address: www.sarasotacountyschools.net/lns

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	88%
State average from 54 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 54 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	95%
State average from 54 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	71%
State average from 54 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 54 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 53 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	65%
State average from 54 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 54 schools:	65%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	613
State average from 54 schools:	539

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 53 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	36%
State average from 54 schools:	60%

Minority Rate

Here:	16%
State average from 54 schools:	57%

Region: 4

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 785 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 785 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 278
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 700

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 700
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 668 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 668 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 230
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 639
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 607

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 638
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 606
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 281 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 281 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 248
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	57%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 127
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	90%
State average from 53 schools:	78%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	88%
State average from 52 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	97%
State average from 53 schools:	89%

Meeting High Standards in Science

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	72%
State average from 53 schools:	52%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 52 schools:	69%

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 53 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	75%
State average from 52 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	74%
State average from 52 schools:	67%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	644
State average from 52 schools:	566

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 52 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	32%
State average from 52 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	14%
State average from 53 schools:	52%

Region: 4

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 787 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 787 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 228
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 708

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 742
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 706
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 687 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 687 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 205
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 650
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 621

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 650
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 620
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 248 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 248 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	76%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 140 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	87%
State average from 52 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	89%
State average from 52 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	94%
State average from 52 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	67%
State average from 51 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 51 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	82%
State average from 51 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 51 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	77%
State average from 51 schools:	69%

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	638
State average from 51 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 51 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	26%
State average from 52 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

Here:	12%
State average from 52 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 820 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 820 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 266
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 796
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 763

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 794
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 761
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 730 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 730 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 239
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 710
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 679

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 709
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 678
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 196 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 196 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 61
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 180
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	85%
State average from 43 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	86%
State average from 43 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	90%
State average from 43 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	61%
State average from 43 schools:	45%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	82%
State average from 43 schools:	65%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	69%
State average from 43 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	73%
State average from 43 schools:	64%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	69%
State average from 43 schools:	68%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	615
State average from 43 schools:	531

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 43 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	17%
State average from 43 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	33%
State average from 43 schools:	57%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 474 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 472 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 153
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 461
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 460
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 317 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 316 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	96%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 75
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	84%
State average from 44 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	84%
State average from 44 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	95%
State average from 44 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	77%
State average from 44 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	78%
State average from 44 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	76%
State average from 44 schools:	65%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	494
State average from 44 schools:	418

Percent Tested

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	100%
State average from 44 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	15%
State average from 44 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	31%
State average from 44 schools:	56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 504 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 500 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	99%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 150
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 495
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 494
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 348 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	99%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 95

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 342
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 341
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 97 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	97%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 37

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 96
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 96
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (98%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	60%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 72

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 83
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 83
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	72%
State average from 43 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	77%
State average from 43 schools:	65%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	66%
State average from 43 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	64%
State average from 43 schools:	62%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 43 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	55%
State average from 43 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	409
State average from 43 schools:	400

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 43 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	13%
State average from 43 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	29%
State average from 43 schools:	55%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	1428
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	37%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	79%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1767
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	3%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	48%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	94%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	22
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1724
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	22%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	45%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	77%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	11
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1925
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	350
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	7%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	41%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	20%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	92%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1965
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	4%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	85%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	19
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1999
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	334
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	5%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	25%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	18
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	11%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	50%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	68%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	9
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	9
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	16%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	10
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	9
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	10
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1503
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	7%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	13%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	84%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1663
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	1%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	11%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	47%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	88%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1676
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	335
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	17%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	68%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1878
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	357
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	8%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	40%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	87%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1909
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	17%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	79%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	7
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1978
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	3%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	10%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	30%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	16%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	87%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	8
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1525
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1733
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	346
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1773
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1874
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	341
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1945
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1981
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1566
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	358
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1661
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	347
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1752
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	351
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1885
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	359
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1913
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1963
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	337
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 91

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 150

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	5
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 18%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 23%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 95%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1520
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1694
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	339
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1715
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1841
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1902
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	335
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1968
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1589
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	362
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1651
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	345
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1721
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	344
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1805
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	340
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1904
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	335
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1985
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	343
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	100
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	650
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	74
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	123
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

Here:	663
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	78
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	113
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	81
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	171
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	690
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	9
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	151
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	697
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

Here:	79
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	152
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	710
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	82
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	8
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	16
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	12
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 119

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	333
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 83%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 159

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	314
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 64%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 87%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1517
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	336
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1576
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1588
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1482
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 105

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1729
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	324
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1740
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1644
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 96

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	327
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1621
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	369
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 35%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1624
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	338
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 94%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1626
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1547
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 79

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	1767
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	354
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1778
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1641
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 138

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 158

Mean Scale Score

Here:	656
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 158

Mean Scale Score

Here:	648
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 66
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 159

Mean Scale Score

Here:	679
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 156

Mean Scale Score

Here:	659
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 159

Mean Scale Score

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	668
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 158

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 155

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	320
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 71%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

LAUREL NOKOMIS SCHOOL:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID	IL
IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	ME	MI
MN	MO	MS	MT	NC	ND	NE
NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY	OH	OK
OR	PA	RI	SC	SD	TN	TX
VA	VT	WA	WI	WV	WY

AK	AL	AR	AZ	CA	CO	CT
DC	DE	FL	GA	HI	IA	ID
IL	IN	KS	KY	LA	MA	MD
ME	MI	MN	MO	MS	MT	NC
ND	NE	NH	NJ	NM	NV	NY
OH	OK	OR	PA	RI	SC	SD
TN	TX	UT	VA	VT	WA	WI
WV	WY

AB	BC	MB	NB	NL	NS	NT
NU	ON	PE	QC	SK	YT