
Back to: Tampa, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 16.
5410 N 20TH ST
Tampa, FL 33610
Other nearby schools ratings:
Learey Technical Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Hillsborough County:  42  Tampa:  41  Learey Technical Center School:  16 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Tampa, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (813) 2311907 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 2381
School type: Adult
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 2311855
Principal: Annmarie Courtney
The function/setting of the school: Area VocationalTechnical Center
The main educational program offered at the school: Vocational/Technical
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  54%  State average from 133 schools:  72% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  48%  State average from 133 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  92%  State average from 133 schools:  87% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  34%  State average from 133 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  61%  State average from 133 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 133 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  71%  State average from 133 schools:  59% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  65%  State average from 133 schools:  65% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  490  State average from 133 schools:  541 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 133 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  65%  State average from 133 schools:  52% 
Minority RateHere:  73%  State average from 133 schools:  43% 
Region: 2
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 880 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 880 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 251
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 813
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 775
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 808
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 769
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 238 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 238 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 229
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 219
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 216
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 490 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 490 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 447
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 428
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 424
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 75
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 571 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 571 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 487
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 510
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 485
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  19%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 98
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 98
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  57%  State average from 133 schools:  72% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  45%  State average from 133 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 133 schools:  91% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  30%  State average from 133 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  58%  State average from 133 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  57%  State average from 133 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  65%  State average from 133 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  62%  State average from 133 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  465  State average from 133 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 133 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  62%  State average from 132 schools:  48% 
Minority RateHere:  74%  State average from 133 schools:  42% 
Region: 2
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 849 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 849 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 230
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 784
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 724
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 779
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 717
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 221 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 197
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 210
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 196
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 466 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 429
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 394
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 426
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 391
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 65
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 527 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 527 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 476
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 441
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 474
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 438
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 48
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  25%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 104
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 103
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  54%  State average from 131 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  46%  State average from 131 schools:  72% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  83%  State average from 131 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  29%  State average from 131 schools:  48% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  60%  State average from 131 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  61%  State average from 131 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  72%  State average from 131 schools:  61% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  61%  State average from 131 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  466  State average from 131 schools:  540 
Percent TestedLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  99%  State average from 131 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  60%  State average from 131 schools:  47% 
Minority RateHere:  74%  State average from 131 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 768 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 768 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 229
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 694
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 646
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 694
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 647
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 200 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 200 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 178
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 178
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 423 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 424 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 378
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 353
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 380
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 356
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 74
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 73
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 459 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 460 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 402
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 375
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 403
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 375
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 92
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  50%  State average from 10 schools:  72% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  47%  State average from 11 schools:  62% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  85%  State average from 11 schools:  84% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  40%  State average from 11 schools:  42% 
Making Reading GainsLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  54%  State average from 11 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  59%  State average from 11 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  62%  State average from 11 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  53%  State average from 11 schools:  66% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  450  State average from 11 schools:  516 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 11 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  54%  State average from 11 schools:  56% 
Minority RateHere:  70%  State average from 11 schools:  58% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 820 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 822 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 236
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 739
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 740
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 227
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 228
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 440 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 440 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 387
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 387
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 92 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 82
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 446 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 446 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 394
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 391
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  17%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  49%  State average from 10 schools:  66% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  46%  State average from 10 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  84%  State average from 10 schools:  75% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  60%  State average from 10 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  58%  State average from 10 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  64%  State average from 10 schools:  64% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  361  State average from 10 schools:  399 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 10 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  54%  State average from 10 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  70%  State average from 10 schools:  57% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 916 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 916 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 279
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 837
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 835
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 279 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 279 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  98%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 92
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 258
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 258
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 482 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 482 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 148
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 441
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 438
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 85
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 87
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 496 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 495 (98%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 141
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 443
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 440
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 111 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 111 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 37
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  17%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 98
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 99
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 132 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 132 (97%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 118
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 118
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  43%  State average from 10 schools:  65% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  43%  State average from 10 schools:  58% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  72%  State average from 10 schools:  80% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  59%  State average from 10 schools:  60% 
Making Math GainsHere:  63%  State average from 10 schools:  63% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  69%  State average from 10 schools:  57% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  349  State average from 10 schools:  382 
Percent TestedHere:  98%  State average from 10 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  52%  State average from 10 schools:  62% 
Minority RateLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  67%  State average from 10 schools:  56% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1556  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  31%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  31%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  12%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  45%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1734  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  18%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  17%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  57%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1818  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  296  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  24%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  40%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  27%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  1%  State average:  3% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  36%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  34%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  38%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  28%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  7  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1569  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  43%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  23%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  23%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  35%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  5  State average:  6 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  1709  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  35%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  24%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  31%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  1%  State average:  7% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  41%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1848  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  21%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  26%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  53%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  1642  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1696  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  296  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1834  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1576  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1683  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1824  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 251
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 86%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1596  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1728  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1797  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  282  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  1566  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1714  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  1836  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  285  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  657  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Literary (max 18)LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  12  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  6  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  247  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  671  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Literary (max 18)LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  14  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  246  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  676  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Median NPRLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  54  State average:  63 
Functional (max 18)LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  13  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 250
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  258  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 24%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 75%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1577  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  287  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1586  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1533  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 52
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1647  State average from 808 schools:  1746 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  305 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1658  State average:  1743 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1591  State average:  1668 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 68
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1793  State average from 819 schools:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  294 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1825  State average:  1807 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1731  State average:  1738 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 94
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1517  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  274  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1538  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1562  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 24
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1693  State average from 804 schools:  1777 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  282  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1704  State average:  1774 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1597  State average:  1645 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 107
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000LEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  1824  State average from 815 schools:  1851 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1852  State average:  1845 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1731  State average:  1755 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 121
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 293
Mean Scale ScoreLEAREY TECHNICAL CENTER:  661  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 54
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 277
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  664  State average from 796 schools:  675 
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 258
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  685  State average from 810 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 62
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 293
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  653  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 49
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 277
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  672  State average from 796 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 258
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  694  State average from 810 schools:  698 
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 253
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  259  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 27%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17  Combined: 9
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 73%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 55%
