Lee Middle School in Orlando, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 55.

1201 MAURY RD
Orlando, FL 32804

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lake Eola Charter School (3.0 miles):

98
Millennium Middle School (13.3 miles):

68
Lakeview Middle School (12.6 miles):

59
Lee Middle School:

55
Ocoee Middle School (9.0 miles):

53
Apopka Middle School (9.9 miles):

35
Hopper Center School (17.3 miles):

18
Kissimmee Charter Academy School (17.6 miles):

9
Transition Center School (2.7 miles):

0
Lee Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Orange County:

44
Orlando:

42
Lee Middle School:

55

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (407) 245-1800 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 48
School number: 581
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: ORANGE
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (407) 245-1809
Principal: Tom Pylant
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 8
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 38
Senate District: 22

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

92%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

84%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

645
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 398 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 398 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 124
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 389
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 386

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 388
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 385
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 312 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 312 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 307
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 306
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

96%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

83%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

668
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

22%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 409 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 409 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 139
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 401
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 401
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 392
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 325 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 325 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 112
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 313

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 313
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

94%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

78%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

655
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

8%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 418 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 418 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 135
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 411
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 399

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 411
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 399
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 106
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 318

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 318
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

94%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

489
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

69%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 886 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 882 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 253
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 820
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 818
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 268 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 258
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 257
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 496 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 494 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 143
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 449
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 580 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 579 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 156
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 534
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 533
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

59%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

52%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

401
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 972 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 967 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 278
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 892
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 889
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 322 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 118

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 303
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 301
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 514 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 511 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 124
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 463
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 461
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (96%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 645 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 641 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 154
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 590
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 588
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 87 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 81

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 82
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 166 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 60
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 151
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 150
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

63%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

392
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1629
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

52%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

94%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1770
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1845
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1659
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1798
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1875
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

50%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1916
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1924
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

54%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

39%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

33%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

76%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

34%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

39%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

31%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

394
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

44%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

40%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

97%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1747
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

367
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

93%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

29%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1640
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

30%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1781
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

52%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1873
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

17%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

19%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1941
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

65%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2002
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

81%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1635
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

355
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 01%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 04

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1868
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

349
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1665
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1779
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1844
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1888
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1892
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1697
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

386
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1823
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1630
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1776
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

303
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1865
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1950
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1969
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 140
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 52%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 280
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 489
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 78%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1658
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1785
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1845
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1683
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1774
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1882
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

309
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1860
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1857
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1662
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

378
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1744
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

366
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1832
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

368
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1667
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1759
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1880
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

316
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1925
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1973
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

137
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

81
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

133
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

85
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

149
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

691
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

88
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

296
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

671
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

271
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

681
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

251
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

68
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

506
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

54
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

414
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

703
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 135
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

335
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 74%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 254
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

300
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 49%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 454
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

297
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1632
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1648
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1563
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 86

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1784
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1804
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1697
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 108

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1850
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1863
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1777
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 86

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1581
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1591
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1575
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 16

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1762
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1778
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LEE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1644
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 135

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1841
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1849
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1762
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 87

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 321
Mean Scale Score
Here:

667
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 268
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 63
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 265
Mean Scale Score
Here:

688
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 320
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 268
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 264
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 67
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 265
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

291
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 88%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 75%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2022 Advameg, Inc.