
Back to: Lehigh Acres, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 26.
200 SCHOOL SIDE COURT
Lehigh Acres, FL 33936
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lehigh Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Lee County:  49  Lehigh Acres:  44  Lehigh Elementary School:  26 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Phone: (239) 3692477 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 301
School type: Elementary
District Name: LEE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 3694506
Principal: Dwayne Courtney
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 72
Senate District: 27
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/lhl
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  74%  State average from 963 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  80%  State average from 963 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  70%  State average from 963 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  28%  State average from 962 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  67%  State average from 963 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  67%  State average from 963 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  60%  State average from 963 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  61%  State average from 963 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  507  State average from 963 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 963 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  81%  State average from 963 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  75%  State average from 963 schools:  47% 
Region: 2
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  72%  State average from 959 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  70%  State average from 959 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  76%  State average from 959 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  36%  State average from 959 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  58%  State average from 959 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  61%  State average from 959 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  52%  State average from 959 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  67%  State average from 959 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  492  State average from 959 schools:  560 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 959 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  83%  State average from 959 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  79%  State average from 959 schools:  46% 
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  19%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  58%  State average from 954 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  63%  State average from 954 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  67%  State average from 954 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  24%  State average from 954 schools:  48% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  51%  State average from 954 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  62%  State average from 954 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  74%  State average from 954 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 954 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  466  State average from 954 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 954 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: D
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  82%  State average from 954 schools:  51% 
Minority RateHere:  77%  State average from 954 schools:  45% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  77%  State average from 862 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  70%  State average from 862 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  78%  State average from 862 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  30%  State average from 862 schools:  43% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  71%  State average from 862 schools:  70% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  63%  State average from 862 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  59%  State average from 862 schools:  66% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  74%  State average from 862 schools:  68% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  522  State average from 862 schools:  539 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 862 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: B
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  66%  State average from 865 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  64%  State average from 865 schools:  56% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 477 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 477 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 157
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 185 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 185 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 175
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 63
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 198 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 188
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 188
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 85 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  76%  State average from 848 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  73%  State average from 848 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  81%  State average from 848 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  58%  State average from 848 schools:  62% 
Making Math GainsHere:  63%  State average from 848 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  55%  State average from 848 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  406  State average from 848 schools:  413 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 848 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  66%  State average from 848 schools:  58% 
Minority RateLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  60%  State average from 848 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 456 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 455 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 128
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 418
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 416
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 201 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 51
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 191
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 190
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 60
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 49
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 145
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 145
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 284 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 284 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 75
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 252
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 252
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 45
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 68
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 66
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  78%  State average from 834 schools:  72% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  67%  State average from 834 schools:  67% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  73%  State average from 834 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  59%  State average from 834 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  66%  State average from 834 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  58%  State average from 834 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  401  State average from 834 schools:  412 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 834 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  65%  State average from 834 schools:  60% 
Minority RateHere:  53%  State average from 832 schools:  54% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1365  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  17%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  29%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  67%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1621  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  29%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  12%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  75%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  20  State average:  19 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  2  State average:  2 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1626  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  306  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  37%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  22%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  65%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1725  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  14%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  23%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  67%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1869  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  29%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  74%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1947  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  29%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  23%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  63%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1880  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  28%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  37%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8%  State average:  12% 
% in each Achievement Level 5LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  3%  State average:  7% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  36%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1920  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  55%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  36%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  21%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  34%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  27%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  43%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  22%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  2%  State average:  4% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  30%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  48%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  54%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  288  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  39%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  21%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  2%  State average:  5% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  23%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1450  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  34%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  10%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  76%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1571  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  24%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  10%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  77%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1661  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  331  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  40%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  67%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1661  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  27%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  52%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1790  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  18%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  23%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4%  State average:  7% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  60%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1915  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  22%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  19%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  69%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1885  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  20%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  29%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  37%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  51%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1977  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  80%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  14%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  28%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  66%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1448  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1540  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 05%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1538  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1814  State average:  1921 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  279  State average:  299 
Percent Passing: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  288  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1473  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1526  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1569  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1939  State average:  1972 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  321 
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 59
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 51%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 78%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 209
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 10%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  3  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 53%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1287  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1453  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1535  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1790  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1868  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1864  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1851  State average:  1935 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  302 
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1340  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1469  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1620  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1677  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1873  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1833  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  275  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1925  State average:  1984 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  323 
Percent Passing: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  617  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Literary (max 18)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11  State average:  13 
Informational (max 18)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  12  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  9 
Strategies (max 10)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  636  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPRLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  56  State average:  69 
Literary (max 18)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  68  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  657  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
Interpretation (max 20)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  187  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  688  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Median NPRLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  77  State average:  63 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  164  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  693  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Functional (max 18)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  672  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Initial Understanding (max 12)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  7 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  685  State average from 2096 schools:  709 
Literary (max 18)LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 61
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  267  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 54%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 169
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  293  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 83%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 26
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  267  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 31%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 65%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1330  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1545  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1564  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1410  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 154
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1612  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1610  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1471  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 139
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1346  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1502  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1516  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1427  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 89
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1617  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007LEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1628  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1454  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 174
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 171
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  628  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 158
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  641  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 148
Mean Scale ScoreLEHIGH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  666  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 172
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  628  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 157
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  657  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 146
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  657  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 160
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  288  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 72%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 57%
