Leila Davis Elementary School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 84.

2630 LANDMARK DR
Clearwater, FL 33761

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Ptec - St Petersburg School (17.8 miles):

98
Leila Davis Elementary School:

84
Davis Elementary School (7.0 miles):

74
Tarpon Springs Elementary School (9.5 miles):

62
Macfarlane Park Elementary Magnet School (14.3 miles):

50
Skycrest Elementary School (4.4 miles):

39
Richey Elementary School (16.6 miles):

30
Hammond Elementary School (10.9 miles):

19
Dixie Hollins Adult Education Center School (13.9 miles):

0
Leila Davis Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Clearwater:

44
Leila Davis Elementary School:

84

Van
Report this comment as inappropriate
Nov 20, 2013 @ 9:21 pm
Leila Davis is a great school! The teachers, staff and administration are looking to help all students in a positive and engaging way! The new science lab is AMAZING. Not only is the facility GREAT, the opportunity for our students to REALLY do experiments in a LAB is awesome! They are scientists in the making!!

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Clearwater, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 725-7972 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 991
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 725-7975
Principal: Kimberly E Hill
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 48
Senate District: 16
School Web Address: http://www.davis-es.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

48%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

53%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

560
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 382 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 367
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 292
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 284
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

89%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

90%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

603
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

24%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 376 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 376 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 126
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 357

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 356
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 97

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

95%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

72%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

72%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

626
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

24%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 356 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 341
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 339
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 250
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 74
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1593
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

23%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1739
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

80%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1792
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

84%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

28%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

85%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1754
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1542
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1697
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

339
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

371
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1658
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1785
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

358
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 125
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1469
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1762
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1572
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1732
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

355
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

126
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

117
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

113
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

86
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
LEILA DAVIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

5
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 116
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

331
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 75%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 4

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

224
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 3

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

234
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 46%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 62%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2019 Advameg, Inc.