
Back to: Auburndale, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 31.
925 BERKLEY RD
Auburndale, FL 33823
Other nearby schools ratings:
Lena Vista Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Polk County:  41  Auburndale:  47  Lena Vista Elementary School:  31 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Auburndale, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (863) 9655464 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 841
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 9656274
Principal: Mary Payne
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 65
Senate District: 15
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  62%  State average from 963 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  74%  State average from 963 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  81%  State average from 963 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  43%  State average from 962 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  65%  State average from 963 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  67%  State average from 963 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  69%  State average from 963 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  82%  State average from 963 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  543  State average from 963 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 963 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  84%  State average from 963 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  44%  State average from 963 schools:  47% 
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 353 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 306
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 313
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 306
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 213 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 213 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 182
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 187
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 182
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 64
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 64
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 64
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 287 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 287 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 248
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 248
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 36
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  61%  State average from 959 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  73%  State average from 959 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 959 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  45%  State average from 959 schools:  52% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  65%  State average from 959 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  77%  State average from 959 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  71%  State average from 959 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  79%  State average from 959 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  557  State average from 959 schools:  560 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 959 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  80%  State average from 959 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  40%  State average from 959 schools:  46% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 328 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 329 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 281
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 282
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 206 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 173
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 183
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 174
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 246 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 203
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 214
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 204
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 22
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 43
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  65%  State average from 954 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  63%  State average from 954 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  80%  State average from 954 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  39%  State average from 954 schools:  48% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  65%  State average from 954 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 954 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  69%  State average from 954 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  60%  State average from 954 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  506  State average from 954 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 954 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  80%  State average from 954 schools:  51% 
Minority RateLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  41%  State average from 954 schools:  45% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 357 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 356 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 325
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 315
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 314
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 194
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 194
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 54
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 270 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 269 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 237
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 237
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  39%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 55
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  67%  State average from 862 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  66%  State average from 862 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  89%  State average from 862 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  43%  State average from 862 schools:  43% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  76%  State average from 862 schools:  70% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  62%  State average from 862 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  67%  State average from 862 schools:  66% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  69%  State average from 862 schools:  68% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  539  State average from 862 schools:  539 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 862 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  77%  State average from 865 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  36%  State average from 865 schools:  56% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 345 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 345 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 102
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 299
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 228 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 228 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 258 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 258 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 222
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  72%  State average from 848 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  68%  State average from 848 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 848 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  52%  State average from 848 schools:  62% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 848 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  60%  State average from 848 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  403  State average from 848 schools:  413 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 848 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  75%  State average from 848 schools:  58% 
Minority RateHere:  35%  State average from 848 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 316 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (98%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 106
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 292
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 292
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 76
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 206
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 206
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (97%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 34
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 46
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 46
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 236 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 235 (98%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 74
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 213
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 213
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 55
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 55
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  70%  State average from 834 schools:  72% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  65%  State average from 834 schools:  67% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  89%  State average from 834 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  69%  State average from 834 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  66%  State average from 834 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  76%  State average from 834 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  435  State average from 834 schools:  412 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 834 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  77%  State average from 834 schools:  60% 
Minority RateHere:  31%  State average from 832 schools:  54% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1253  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  292  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  28%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  59%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  3  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1460  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  23%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  56%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1553  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  293  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  23%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  54%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  16 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1828  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  34%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  38%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  22%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  29%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1818  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  302 
Percent PassingLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  42%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  47%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  13%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  3%  State average:  8% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  22%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  7 
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  24%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  40%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1%  State average:  4% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  37%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  43%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  36%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  20%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  21%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1412  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  44%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  77%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1547  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  22%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  40%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  69%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1653  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  36%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  21%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5%  State average:  9% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  55%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1851  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  26%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  34%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  3%  State average:  9% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  40%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1950  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  75%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  17%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  59%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1206  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1496  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 01%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1561  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  294  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1787  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1777  State average:  1921 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  272  State average:  299 
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1401  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1551  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1657  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1873  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1922  State average:  1972 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  321 
Percent Passing: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 107
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 82%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 359
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 65%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1246  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1428  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  293  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1535  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1788  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1778  State average:  1935 
Mean Scale Score 100500LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  273  State average:  302 
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  299  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  292  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1307  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1466  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1605  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1856  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  282  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1911  State average:  1984 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  323 
Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  122  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  614  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  633  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  10 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  115  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  652  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  12  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  326  State average:  273 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  679  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  228  State average:  237 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  694  State average from 2096 schools:  709 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  10 
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 119
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  289  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 50%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 77%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 341
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  256  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 23%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 52%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1247  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1414  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1445  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1311  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 134
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1587  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1578  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1465  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 113
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1334  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1454  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1464  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1381  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 83
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1628  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1624  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006LENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1462  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 162
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 122
Mean Scale ScoreLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  621  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 118
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  630  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 50
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale ScoreLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  664  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 120
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  626  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 118
Mean Scale ScoreLENA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  647  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 107
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  658  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  290  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 58%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 82%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 68%
