Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Leo J Leo Elementary School in Mission, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 72
Address
 1625 ROQUE SALINAS
Mission, TX 78572
Telephone
(956) 323-2370
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
72
Students
588
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
38.6
Free lunch eligible students
536
School district
LA JOYA ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
HENRY B GONZALEZ EL (1.0 miles):

82
JOSE DE ESCANDON EL (2.1 miles):

75
Leo J Leo Elementary School:

72
CESAR CHAVEZ MIDDLE (1.5 miles):

67
ANN RICHARDS MIDDLE (1.3 miles):

58
IRENE M GARCIA MIDDLE (1.9 miles):

57
E B REYNA EL (1.6 miles):

52
GUILLERMO FLORES EL (0.2 miles):

51
PREMIER H S OF PALMVIEW (1.0 miles):

22
Leo J Leo Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Hidalgo County:

58
Mission:

62
Leo J Leo Elementary School:

72

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 588
Enrollment in 2015: 593
Enrollment in 2014: 612
Enrollment in 2013: 619
Enrollment in 2012: 615
Enrollment in 2011: 683
Enrollment in 2010: 709
Enrollment in 2009: 702
Enrollment in 2008: 665
Enrollment in 2007: 676
Enrollment in 2006: 761
Enrollment in 2005: 756
Enrollment in 2004: 817
Enrollment in 2003: 792
Enrollment in 2002: 787
Enrollment in 2001: 748
Enrollment in 2000: 713
Enrollment in 1999: 797

Leo J Leo Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students83888589898074588
Female students39394243374038278
Male students44494346524036310
Hispanic students81888589898074586
White students2 - - - - - - 2

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 83
Kindergarten enrollment: 88
1st grade enrollment: 85
2nd grade enrollment: 89
3rd grade enrollment: 89
4th grade enrollment: 80
5th grade enrollment: 74

Leo J Leo Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 278 (47.3%)
Leo J Leo Elementary School:

47.3%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 310 (52.7%)
Here:

52.7%
State:

50.1%

Leo J Leo Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Hispanic enrollment: 586 (99.7%)
Here:

99.7%
State:

46.9%
White enrollment: 2 (0.3%)
Leo J Leo Elementary School:

0.3%
Texas:

32.3%

Leo J Leo Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 536 (91.2%)
Here:

91.2%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 536 (91.2%)
Leo J Leo Elementary School:

91.2%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 0 (0.0%)
School:

0.0%
Texas:

6.2%

Leo J Leo Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 38.6

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 8
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 2
Number of FTE school counselors: 1.3
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 14
Number of FTE nurses: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

15.2
Texas:

15.6

Leo J Leo Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,956,673
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 38.6 (Salary Expenditures: $1,546,029)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $72,586)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4 (Salary Expenditures: $190,165)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $147,893)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $121,627
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,559,507
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $1,978,491
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 9 (Salary Expenditures: $189,633)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 4.3 (Salary Expenditures: $243,490)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $147,893)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $0

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 340 (male: 176, female: 164)
  • Hispanic: 340 (male: 176, female: 164)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 13 (male: 8, female: 5)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 29 (male: 22, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 29 (male: 22, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 17 (male: 10, female: 7)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
  • Hispanic: 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10 (male: 8, female: 2)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
School:

2.3%
Texas:

5.2%
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all female)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

2.4%
Texas:

6.1%
Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
Leo J Leo Elementary School:

2.2%
State:

4.8%

Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 31 (male: 8, female: 23)
  • Hispanic: 31 (male: 8, female: 23)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 5, female: 14)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

52.7
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,502
  • Males1,474
  • Females1,548
  • Hispanic1,502
Math Average Scale Score:

1,502
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 71
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 71

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 4.8 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.9 (72%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 24%

17%
25%
34%
24%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,474, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 18%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 18%)
23%
18%
41%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,548, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 33%)
7%
37%
23%
33%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 24%)
17%
25%
34%
24%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,451
  • Males1,444
  • Females1,459
  • Hispanic1,451
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,451
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 29
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 29

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.3 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.5 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 49%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

10%
49%
20%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,444, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 25%)
19%
31%
25%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,459, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 69%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 15%)
69%
16%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,451, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 49%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 21%)
10%
49%
20%
21%
3rd Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 1
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 1

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,397
  • Males1,356
  • Females1,483
  • Hispanic1,397
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,397
State:

956
Reading students tested: 43
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 43

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.5 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.8 (56%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

28%
32%
19%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,356, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 17%)
41%
31%
11%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,483, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 29%)
36%
35%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,397, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 28%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 21%)
28%
32%
19%
21%
4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,560
  • Males1,546
  • Females1,576
  • Hispanic1,560
Math Average Scale Score:

1,560
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 77
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 77

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.4 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.6 (66%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 14%

17%
40%
29%
14%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,546, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 12%)
21%
39%
28%
12%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,576, Tested: 35, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 17%)
11%
43%
29%
17%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 77, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
17%
40%
29%
14%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,502
  • Males1,507
  • Females1,495
  • Hispanic1,502
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,502
State:

1,496
Reading students tested: 38
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 38

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.6 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 29%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 16%

32%
29%
23%
16%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,507, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 18%)
36%
28%
18%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,495, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 13%)
25%
31%
31%
13%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,502, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 32%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 16%)
32%
29%
23%
16%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,612
  • Males3,563
  • Females3,679
  • Hispanic3,612
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,612
State:

3,570
Writing students tested: 36
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 36

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.5 (44%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 4.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.1 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 17%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 36%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

44%
17%
36%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,563, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 52%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 5%)
52%
15%
28%
5%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,679, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 47%, Masters: 0%)
33%
20%
47%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,612, Tested: 36, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 36%, Masters: 3%)
44%
17%
36%
3%
4th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 4
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 4

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,489
  • Males1,458
  • Females1,525
  • Hispanic1,489
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,489
Texas:

815
Reading students tested: 43
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 43

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.6 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.3 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.5 (58%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 51%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%

16%
51%
24%
9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,458, Tested: 23, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 61%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 4%)
17%
61%
18%
4%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,525, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 30%, Masters: 15%)
15%
40%
30%
15%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,489, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 16%, Approaches: 51%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 9%)
16%
51%
24%
9%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade (Spanish))

  • All4,016
  • Males3,860
  • Females4,194
  • Hispanic4,016
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,016
Texas:

2,017
Writing students tested: 45
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 45

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (57%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.6 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.4 (78%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 31%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 18%

11%
40%
31%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,860, Tested: 24, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 54%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 17%)
17%
54%
12%
17%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,194, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 52%, Masters: 19%)
5%
24%
52%
19%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,016, Tested: 45, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 18%)
11%
40%
31%
18%
5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,616
  • Males1,603
  • Females1,635
  • Hispanic1,616
Math Average Scale Score:

1,616
Texas:

1,603
Math students tested: 73
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 73

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.5 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 30%

18%
26%
26%
30%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 44, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 30%)
18%
30%
22%
30%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,635, Tested: 29, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
17%
21%
31%
31%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 73, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 18%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 30%)
18%
26%
26%
30%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,559
  • Males1,559
  • Females1,560
  • Hispanic1,559
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,559
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 60
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 60

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.2 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.1 (65%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 23%

25%
27%
25%
23%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 38, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 24%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 18%)
24%
26%
32%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,560, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 32%)
27%
28%
13%
32%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,559, Tested: 60, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 23%)
25%
27%
25%
23%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,789
  • Males3,851
  • Females3,691
  • Hispanic3,789
Science Average Scale Score:

3,789
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 64
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 64

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.1 (68%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.5 (69%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.3 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 8.5 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 8%

27%
40%
25%
8%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,851, Tested: 39, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 21%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 10%)
21%
43%
26%
10%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,691, Tested: 25, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 4%)
36%
36%
24%
4%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,789, Tested: 64, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 8%)
27%
40%
25%
8%
5th Grade (Spanish)
Math students tested: 2
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 2

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All1,621
  • Males1,592
  • Females1,654
  • Hispanic1,621
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,621
Texas:

683
Reading students tested: 15
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 15

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.9 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.7 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 9.9 (70%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 33%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 54%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%

33%
54%
13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,592, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 13%)
50%
37%
13%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 14%, Meets: 72%, Masters: 14%)
14%
72%
14%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 54%, Masters: 13%)
33%
54%
13%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade (Spanish))

  • All3,620
  • Males3,618
  • Hispanic3,620
Science Average Scale Score:

3,620
Texas:

857
Science students tested: 11
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 11

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.9 (65%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.3 (66%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (55%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 7.5 (63%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 46%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%

36%
46%
18%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,618, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
43%
28%
29%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,620, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 46%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 0%)
36%
46%
18%

Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 73 (male: 35, female: 38)
  • Hispanic: 73 (male: 35, female: 38)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 43 (male: 20, female: 23)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Leo J Leo Elementary School:

124.1
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)
Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.

    School days missed due to out-of-school suspension

  • Hispanic14
  • LEP10
  • IDEA1
  • 5042
School days missed due to out-of-school suspension: 14 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 14
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 10
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 1
  • Section 504: 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Students without disabilities): 7

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Students without disabilities)
Leo J Leo Elementary School:

11.9
State:

102.7
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 22 (male: 17, female: 5)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 16 (male: 14, female: 2)
Students without disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Students without disabilities receiving more than one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
Instances of out-of-school suspension (Section 504 only): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (Section 504 only)
School:

1.7
Texas:

12.0
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 5 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 5
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 5
Students with disabilities receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2
  • Section 504: 2

Expulsions:
Show data for

(State average from 1,623 schools)
Preschool expulsion refers to the permanent termination of a preschool child's participation in a preschool program at a school or facility for disciplinary purposes. A preschool child who is transitioned directly from the classroom to a different setting deemed to be more appropriate for the child (e.g., special education, transitional classroom, or therapeutic preschool program) is not considered an expelled preschooler.
Total Number of Preschool Children who Received Expulsions: 28 (male: 14, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 28 (male: 14, female: 14)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all female)

Preschool Children who Received Expulsions per 1,000 students)
Here:

47.6
Texas:

2.9

Comments

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:

Discuss Mission, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.

  1. All Cities
  2. Texas
  3. Mission main city page
  4. Schools in Texas
  5. Leo J Leo Elementary School


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents