Life Stream Academy School in Leesburg, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 0.

2020 TALLEY RD
Leesburg, FL 34748

Show street view No street view available for this location

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (352) 315-7890 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 35
School number: 9010
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: LAKE
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
School's status regarding neglected and delinquent criteria: Delinquent, Non-residential
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (352) 326-3256
Principal: Glenna Osborne
The function/setting of the school: Alternative to Expulsion
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 6
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 42
Senate District: 20
School Web Address: http://www.lsbc.net/

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 87 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (91%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (93%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (97%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (94%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (92%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (93%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

991
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

249
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1582
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

246
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

12%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1346
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

206
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

83%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

5
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

76%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

10%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

10%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

915
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

217
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

64%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

27%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1202
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

200
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

90%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

1
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

64%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1639
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

218
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

75%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

8%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

8%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

1
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

811
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1573
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

272
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1503
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

208
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

1068
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1349
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1608
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1584
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

241
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 24
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 25%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1172
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

214
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1200
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

201
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1494
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1421
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

220
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

188
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1325
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

229
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1405
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

211
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1668
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1494
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

175
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 92%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

103

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

97

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

101

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

11
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

609
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

12
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

15
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

625
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

12
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

5
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

13
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

638
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

14
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

6
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

196
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 25%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1259
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

230
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 64%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

1294
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

1343
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -49

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

1361
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1348
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1326
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 22

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1464
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

221
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 63%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1492
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1582
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -89

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

210
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1333
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

231
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 62%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1359
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1541
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -182

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1440
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

1428
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1287
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 141

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1599
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 56%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
LIFE STREAM ACADEMY:

1700
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1631
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 69

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
Here:

611
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 14
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 5
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 12): 4
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale Score
Here:

626
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 12): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 8
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale Score
Here:

642
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 22
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 8
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Here:

617
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 15
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 36
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 22
Mean Scale Score
Here:

656
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 29
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 18
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

208
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 6%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 50%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 33%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Leesburg, FL
  5. Life Stream Academy School in Leesburg, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.