U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
Forum City-Data.com Homepage

LOWER CREEK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL in Lenoir, NC



Back to: Lenoir, NC, North Carolina, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active North Carolina forum.

City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2006 test average as compared to other schools in North Carolina) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 63.

Address:
630 Lower Creek Drive NE
Lenoir, NC 28645


Principal: Indicott Debbie
Phone (make sure to verify first before calling): (828) 754-4022
Fax (make sure to verify first): (828) 754-8758
E-mail:
Homepage: lces.caldwellschools.com/
Agency: Caldwell County Schools
Grade span: 0K - 5

School type: Regular school
School level: Primary School
  1. ABCs of Public Education
  2. AYP Read Grade 10
  3. AYP Math Grade 10

ABCs of Public Education
Expected Grow: Yes

High Grow: No

Change Ratio: 1.11

ABC Average Grow: No

AYP Read Grade 10

Percent Tested All Students:
This school:  99.0%
State average from 1835 schools:  99.8%

Percent Tested White:
Here:  99.0%
State average from 1524 schools:  99.9%

Percent Tested Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1687 schools:  99.6%

Percent Proficient All Students:
Here:  66.5%
State average from 1869 schools:  64.7%

Percent Proficient White:
This school:  77.7%
State average from 1498 schools:  74.8%

Percent Proficient Economically Disadvantaged:
Lower Creek Elem:  43.2%
State average from 1661 schools:  53.2%

Number Of Students Tested All Students: 191
Number Of Students Tested American Indian: 1
Number Of Students Tested Asian: 3
Number Of Students Tested Black: 28
Number Of Students Tested Hispanic: 7
Number Of Students Tested Multi-Racial: 9
Number Of Students Tested White: 143
Number Of Students Tested Limited English Proficiency: 4
Number Of Students Tested With Disabilities: 22

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met All Students: Met
Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met White: Met

Number Of Students All Students: 192
Number Of Students American Indian: 1
Number Of Students Asian: 3
Number Of Students Black: 28
Number Of Students Hispanic: 7
Number Of Students Multi-Racial: 9
Number Of Students White: 144
Number Of Students Limited English Proficiency: 4
Number Of Students With Disabilities: 23

Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) All Students: 182
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) American Indian: 1
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Asian: 3
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Black: 25
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Hispanic: 6
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Multi-Racial: 8
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) White: 139
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Limited English Proficiency: 4
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) With Disabilities: 21

Percent Proficient With Growth All Students:
Here:  70.3%
State average from 1869 schools:  68.9%

Percent Proficient With Growth White:
Here:  78.4%
State average from 1498 schools:  75.3%

Met AYP Proficiency Goal All Students: Met
Met AYP Proficiency Goal White: Met

Number Of Students Included In Growth All Students: 173
Number Of Students Included In Growth American Indian: 1
Number Of Students Included In Growth Asian: 3
Number Of Students Included In Growth Black: 25
Number Of Students Included In Growth Hispanic: 5
Number Of Students Included In Growth Multi-Racial: 8
Number Of Students Included In Growth White: 131
Number Of Students Included In Growth Limited English Proficiency: 4
Number Of Students Included In Growth With Disabilities: 17

Percent Met Growth Expectation All Students: 48.0
Percent Met Growth Expectation White: 53.4

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent All Students:
This school:  96.2%
State average from 1812 schools:  95.4%

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent White:
Here:  96.3%
State average from 1492 schools:  95.3%

Number Of Students Economically Disadvantaged: 80
Number Of Students Tested Economically Disadvantaged: 80

Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Economically Disadvantaged: 74

Percent Proficient With Growth Economically Disadvantaged:
This school:  50.0%
State average from 1661 schools:  57.1%

Met AYP Proficiency Goal Economically Disadvantaged: Not Met

Number Of Students Included In Growth Economically Disadvantaged: 69

Percent Met Growth Expectation Economically Disadvantaged: 33.3

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  95.8%
State average from 1655 schools:  94.7%

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met Economically Disadvantaged: Met

AYP Math Grade 10

Percent Tested All Students:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1835 schools:  99.8%

Percent Tested White:
Here:  100.0%
State average from 1523 schools:  99.9%

Percent Tested Economically Disadvantaged:
This school:  100.0%
State average from 1691 schools:  99.6%

Percent Proficient All Students:
Here:  90.1%
State average from 1869 schools:  76.9%

Percent Proficient White:
Here:  94.2%
State average from 1497 schools:  61.8%

Percent Proficient Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  79.7%
State average from 1665 schools:  77.6%

Number Of Students Tested All Students: 192
Number Of Students Tested American Indian: 1
Number Of Students Tested Asian: 3
Number Of Students Tested Black: 28
Number Of Students Tested Hispanic: 7
Number Of Students Tested Multi-Racial: 9
Number Of Students Tested White: 144
Number Of Students Tested Limited English Proficiency: 4
Number Of Students Tested With Disabilities: 23

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met All Students: Met
Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met White: Met

Number Of Students All Students: 192
Number Of Students American Indian: 1
Number Of Students Asian: 3
Number Of Students Black: 28
Number Of Students Hispanic: 7
Number Of Students Multi-Racial: 9
Number Of Students White: 144
Number Of Students Limited English Proficiency: 4
Number Of Students With Disabilities: 23

Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) All Students: 182
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) American Indian: 1
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Asian: 3
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Black: 25
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Hispanic: 6
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Multi-Racial: 8
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) White: 139
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Limited English Proficiency: 4
Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) With Disabilities: 21

Percent Proficient With Growth All Students:
Here:  91.2%
State average from 1869 schools:  77.7%

Met AYP Proficiency Goal All Students: Met
Met AYP Proficiency Goal White: Met

Number Of Students Included In Growth All Students: 173
Number Of Students Included In Growth American Indian: 1
Number Of Students Included In Growth Asian: 3
Number Of Students Included In Growth Black: 25
Number Of Students Included In Growth Hispanic: 5
Number Of Students Included In Growth Multi-Racial: 8
Number Of Students Included In Growth White: 131
Number Of Students Included In Growth Limited English Proficiency: 4
Number Of Students Included In Growth With Disabilities: 17

Percent Met Growth Expectation All Students: 54.9
Percent Met Growth Expectation White: 62.6

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent All Students:
Here:  96.2%
State average from 1812 schools:  95.4%

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent White:
Here:  96.3%
State average from 1491 schools:  95.3%

Number Of Students Economically Disadvantaged: 80
Number Of Students Tested Economically Disadvantaged: 80

Number Of Tested Students (Full Academic Year) Economically Disadvantaged: 74

Percent Proficient With Growth Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  81.1%
State average from 1665 schools:  78.6%

Met AYP Proficiency Goal Economically Disadvantaged: Met

Number Of Students Included In Growth Economically Disadvantaged: 69

Percent Met Growth Expectation Economically Disadvantaged: 46.4

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Percent Economically Disadvantaged:
Here:  95.8%
State average from 1657 schools:  94.7%

Other Academic Indicator Attendance Met Economically Disadvantaged: Met

Back to: Lenoir, NC, North Carolina, North Carolina forum, All US cities.