Macfarlane Park Elementary Magnet School in Tampa, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 50.

1721 N MACDILL AVE
Tampa, FL 33607

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Disston Gifted Center School (18.8 miles):

98
Bay Vista Fundamental Elementary School (19.3 miles):

73
Claywell Elementary School (9.9 miles):

61
Gibsonton Elementary School (10.7 miles):

51
Macfarlane Park Elementary Magnet School:

50
Yates Elementary School (13.3 miles):

41
Frost Elementary School (9.3 miles):

30
Sheehy Elementary School (5.8 miles):

18
Macfarlane Park Elementary Magnet School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Macfarlane Park Elementary Magnet:

50

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (813) 356-1760 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 60
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 356-1764
Magnet School.
Principal: Denyse Riveiro
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 58
Senate District: 18

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 734 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

62%
State average from 734 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

69%
State average from 734 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

39%
State average from 733 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 734 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 733 schools:

67%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 734 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 734 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

463
State average from 734 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 733 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

76%
State average from 734 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 735 schools:

46%
Region: 4

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 370 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 370 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 358
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 358

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 358
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 358
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 240 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 240 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 234

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 234
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 282 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 282 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 271
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 735 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 734 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

80%
State average from 734 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

42%
State average from 734 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 735 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 735 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 734 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

543
State average from 734 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 734 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 734 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 734 schools:

45%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 381 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 381 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 361
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 361

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 361
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 361
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 283 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 263
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 263
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 263
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 711 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 711 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

55%
State average from 711 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

43%
State average from 711 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 711 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 711 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 711 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 711 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

490
State average from 711 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 711 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

62%
State average from 711 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 711 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 358 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 358 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 346
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 346
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 248 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 248 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 241
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 241
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 241
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 244 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (100%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 234

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 234
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

92%
State average from 652 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

88%
State average from 652 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 652 schools:

83%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

68%
State average from 650 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 652 schools:

72%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 652 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 652 schools:

67%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 652 schools:

69%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

657
State average from 652 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 652 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 655 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 655 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 202 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 200
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 643 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 643 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 643 schools:

81%
Making Reading Gains
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 643 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

85%
State average from 643 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 643 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

468
State average from 643 schools:

420
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 643 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 644 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

65%
State average from 644 schools:

54%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 67
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 174
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 174
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 37
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 73
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 73
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 631 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 631 schools:

80%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 631 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 631 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 631 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

454
State average from 631 schools:

417
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 631 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 631 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 631 schools:

52%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1341
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

66%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

1530
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

51%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1567
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

9
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1390
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

19%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1383
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1538
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1598
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1419
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

1427
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

1536
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 115
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 70%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1350
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1529
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1568
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1400
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1434
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1584
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

356
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

626
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

118
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

646
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

125
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

663
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

69
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 124
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

260
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1770
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

352
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1760
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1603
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 157

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1830
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1835
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1701
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 134

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1719
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

391
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 45%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1732
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 34%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1739
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1669
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1821
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1824
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1751
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 73

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65
Mean Scale Score
Here:

681
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 90
Literary (max 18): 16
Informational (max 18): 16
Functional (max 18): 16
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 11
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 68
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale Score
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

693
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 88
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65
Mean Scale Score
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

689
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 94
Number Sense (max 14): 13
Operations (max 11): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 68
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 91
Number Sense (max 12): 11
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale Score
Here:

695
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 89
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 68
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
MACFARLANE PARK ELEMENTARY MAGNET SCHOOL:

337
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 72%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2020 Advameg, Inc.