|
Back to: Manchester Center, VT, Vermont, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Vermont forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2007 test average as compared to other schools in Vermont) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 79.
MEMORIAL AVENUE
Manchester Center, VT 5255
County: BENNINGTON
Grade span: Kindergarten - 8th Grade
Phone: (802) 362-1597 (make sure to verify first before calling)
Enrollment in Manchester Elementarymiddle School
Kindergarten Enrollment : 35
1st Grade Enrollment : 36
2nd Grade Enrollment : 37
3rd Grade Enrollment : 40
4th Grade Enrollment : 45
5th Grade Enrollment : 48
6th Grade Enrollment : 60
7th Grade Enrollment : 55
8th Grade Enrollment : 74
Female Enrollment : 216
Male Enrollment : 212
White Enrollment : 414
Black Enrollment : 4
Hispanic Enrollment : 5
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 5
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 53
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 33
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 86
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 9.9
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 43.4
Genders in Manchester Elementarymiddle School Grades in Manchester Elementarymiddle School Races in Manchester Elementarymiddle School
2004 Student Enrollment: 457
Kindergarten Enrollment : 37
1st Grade Enrollment : 37
2nd Grade Enrollment : 42
3rd Grade Enrollment : 47
4th Grade Enrollment : 43
5th Grade Enrollment : 66
6th Grade Enrollment : 46
7th Grade Enrollment : 69
8th Grade Enrollment : 70
Female Enrollment : 231
Male Enrollment : 223
White Enrollment : 442
Hispanic Enrollment : 6
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 6
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 69
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 23
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 92
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 10.6
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 43
2003 Student Enrollment: 456
Kindergarten Enrollment : 35
1st Grade Enrollment : 38
2nd Grade Enrollment : 45
3rd Grade Enrollment : 38
4th Grade Enrollment : 64
5th Grade Enrollment : 44
6th Grade Enrollment : 60
7th Grade Enrollment : 63
8th Grade Enrollment : 69
Female Enrollment : 241
Male Enrollment : 212
White Enrollment : 441
Hispanic Enrollment : 6
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 6
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 107
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 30
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 137
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 11
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 41.6
2002 Student Enrollment: 483
Kindergarten Enrollment : 40
1st Grade Enrollment : 36
2nd Grade Enrollment : 40
3rd Grade Enrollment : 61
4th Grade Enrollment : 42
5th Grade Enrollment : 57
6th Grade Enrollment : 62
7th Grade Enrollment : 65
8th Grade Enrollment : 80
Female Enrollment : 260
Male Enrollment : 223
White Enrollment : 470
Black Enrollment : 2
Hispanic Enrollment : 6
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 5
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 68
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 27
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 95
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 11.8
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 41
2001 Student Enrollment: 491
Kindergarten Enrollment : 37
1st Grade Enrollment : 44
2nd Grade Enrollment : 64
3rd Grade Enrollment : 39
4th Grade Enrollment : 57
5th Grade Enrollment : 60
6th Grade Enrollment : 51
7th Grade Enrollment : 75
8th Grade Enrollment : 64
Female Enrollment : 258
Male Enrollment : 233
White Enrollment : 478
Black Enrollment : 2
Hispanic Enrollment : 6
Asian / Pacific Islander Enrollment : 5
Free Lunch Eligible Students : 65
Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 26
Free And Reduced Price Lunch Eligible Students : 91
Pupil / Teacher Ratio : 11.2
Full Time Equivalent (FTE) Teachers : 44
Attendance Rate in Manchester Elementarymiddle School Retention Rate in Manchester Elementarymiddle School
Attendance rate: 95.8% | This school: | 95.8% | | State average from 232 schools: | 95.4% |
Retention rate: 0.5% | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.5% | | State average from 169 schools: | 3.3% |
Special education (%): 13.0% | This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 231 schools: | 12.4% |
Home study students : 8
2005 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 95.0% | This school: | 95.0% | | State average from 233 schools: | 95.2% |
Retention rate: 0.5% | Here: | 0.5% | | State average from 180 schools: | 3.3% |
Special education (%): 11.2% | Here: | 11.2% | | State average from 232 schools: | 12.3% |
Home study students : 7
2004 Student Statistics:
Attendance rate: 95.1% | This school: | 95.1% | | State average from 232 schools: | 95.5% |
Retention rate: 0.2% | This school: | 0.2% | | State average from 141 schools: | 2.4% |
Special education (%): 12.1% | Here: | 12.1% | | State average from 231 schools: | 12.3% |
Home study students : 7
2006 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 36.35
Other teachers : 9.60
Instructional aides : 20.50
Instructional coordinators and supervisors : 2.60
Licensed administrators : 2
Administrative support : 4
Other staff : 13.50
Average teacher salary ($): 44,023$ | Here: | 44,023$ | | State average from 234 schools: | 44,460$ |
2005 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 36
Other teachers : 8.50
Instructional aides : 23.50
Instructional coordinators and supervisors : 2
Licensed administrators : 2
Administrative support : 4.63
Other staff : 14
Average teacher salary ($): 43,644$ | Here: | 43,644$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 42,814$ |
2004 Staff Statistics:
Classroom teachers : 35.20
Other teachers : 8.97
Instructional aides : 30.50
Instructional coordinators and supervisors : 1.83
Licensed administrators : 2
Administrative support : 4.55
Other staff : 15.50
Average teacher salary ($): 42,025$ | Here: | 42,025$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 41,394$ |
Risk Factor Statistics:
Poverty rate (%), July 2006: 4.8% | Here: | 4.8% | | State average from 231 schools: | 10.6% |
Poverty rate (%), Dec. 2005: 5.0% | Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 230 schools: | 10.0% |
Poverty rate town rank, July 2006: 242.0% | Here: | 242.0% | | State average from 232 schools: | 100.0% |
Poverty rate town rank, Dec. 2005: 229.0% | Here: | 229.0% | | State average from 231 schools: | 100.0% |
2007 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 25,954$ | Here: | 25,954$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 21,550$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 37.0 | Here: | 37.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 156.1 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 60,943$ | This school: | 60,943$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 51,309$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 64.0 | Here: | 64.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 156.3 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 60.7% | Here: | 60.7% | | State average from 233 schools: | 72.7% |
2006 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 25,352$ | This school: | 25,352$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 20,888$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 24.0 | Here: | 24.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 141.6 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 58,536$ | This school: | 58,536$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 49,082$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 58.0 | This school: | 58.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 155.9 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 62.2% | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 62.2% | | State average from 233 schools: | 75.1% |
2005 Financial Resources Statistics:
Adjusted gross income per exemption ($): 24,666$ | Here: | 24,666$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 19,835$ |
Adjusted gross income per exemption (rank): 25.0 | Here: | 25.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 136.1 |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household ($): 53,625$ | Here: | 53,625$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 46,686$ |
Median Income for Joint & Head of Household (town rank): 61.0 | This school: | 61.0 | | State average from 233 schools: | 139.1 |
Percent of Joint & Head of Household returns less than $75,000: 60.7% | This school: | 60.7% | | State average from 233 schools: | 72.7% |
2007 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 68.4% | Here: | 68.4% | | State average from 233 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 5.8% | Here: | 5.8% | | State average from 230 schools: | 6.1% |
Percent staff services: 2.1% | Here: | 2.1% | | State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 9.3% | This school: | 9.3% | | State average from 233 schools: | 8.8% |
Percent operation: 14.5% | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 14.5% | | State average from 233 schools: | 19.5% |
Financial Expenditures - Manchester Elementarymiddle School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 5,032,638$ | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 5,032,638$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,286,407$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 12,083$ | Here: | 12,083$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 11,797$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 9,366,949$ | Here: | 9,366,949$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 7,256,725$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 327,675$ | This school: | 327,675$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 1,769,547$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 1,364,880$ | Here: | 1,364,880$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,421,788$ |
2006 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 65.9% | Here: | 65.9% | | State average from 233 schools: | 63.4% |
Percent student services: 7.0% | Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 232 schools: | 6.0% |
Percent staff services: 2.6% | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 2.6% | | State average from 230 schools: | 3.3% |
Percent leadership services: 9.0% | Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 233 schools: | 9.0% |
Percent operation: 15.5% | Here: | 15.5% | | State average from 233 schools: | 18.3% |
Financial Expenditures - Manchester Elementarymiddle School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 5,104,755$ | This school: | 5,104,755$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,034,752$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 11,723$ | Here: | 11,723$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 11,289$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 9,027,442$ | Here: | 9,027,442$ | | State average from 233 schools: | 6,992,659$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 258,965$ | Here: | 258,965$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 1,629,679$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 1,436,568$ | This school: | 1,436,568$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,339,712$ |
2005 Financial Expenditures Statistics:
Percent direct instruction: 63.8% | Here: | 63.8% | | State average from 232 schools: | 63.3% |
Percent student services: 9.1% | Here: | 9.1% | | State average from 230 schools: | 6.2% |
Percent staff services: 1.6% | Here: | 1.6% | | State average from 231 schools: | 3.4% |
Percent leadership services: 8.5% | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 8.5% | | State average from 232 schools: | 9.1% |
Percent operation: 17.0% | Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 232 schools: | 18.1% |
Financial Expenditures - Manchester Elementarymiddle School Financial Expenditures - Vermont Total PK-12 current expense ($): 4,899,257$ | Here: | 4,899,257$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 5,698,600$ |
Total PK-12 current expense per site FTE student ($): 11,141$ | This school: | 11,141$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 10,333$ |
Total unduplicated expenditures ($): 9,057,797$ | Here: | 9,057,797$ | | State average from 232 schools: | 6,690,749$ |
Tuition and fees to other Vermont districts ($): 236,880$ | Here: | 236,880$ | | State average from 231 schools: | 1,491,304$ |
K-12 Town Special education costs ($): 1,290,014$ | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 1,290,014$ | | State average from 203 schools: | 1,228,117$ |
NECAP Results in Manchester Elementarymiddle School
NECAP Math Results - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Math Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.27 | Here: | 0.27 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.46 | Here: | 0.46 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | This school: | 0.09 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Female) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Math Results (Female) - Vermont
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.28 | This school: | 0.28 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.45 | Here: | 0.45 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.16 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.16 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | This school: | 0.11 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (Male) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Math Results (Male) - Vermont
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26 | Here: | 0.26 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.47 | Here: | 0.47 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Math Results (FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.39 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.39 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.38 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.23 | Here: | 0.23 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.34 | Here: | 0.34 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.28 |
NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Math Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.31 | Here: | 0.31 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.47 | This school: | 0.47 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.47 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.13 |
2007 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP Reading Results - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Reading Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26 | Here: | 0.26 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.55 | Here: | 0.55 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06 | Here: | 0.06 | | State average from 234 schools: | 0.11 |
NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Reading Results (Female) - Vermont
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.37 | Here: | 0.37 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.45 | Here: | 0.45 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.12 | Here: | 0.12 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06 | Here: | 0.06 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.08 |
NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Reading Results (Male) - Vermont
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.15 | This school: | 0.15 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.12 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.63 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.63 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.15 | Here: | 0.15 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06 | Here: | 0.06 | | State average from 225 schools: | 0.14 |
NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Reading Results (FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.02 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.02 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.55 | This school: | 0.55 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.25 | This school: | 0.25 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.18 |
NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP Reading Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.30 | This school: | 0.30 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.20 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.54 | Here: | 0.54 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.02 | Here: | 0.02 | | State average from 202 schools: | 0.08 |
2007 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
NECAP writing Results - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP writing Results - Vermont
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.19 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.14 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.44 | Here: | 0.44 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.33 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.22 | This school: | 0.22 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.15 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.15 | | State average from 194 schools: | 0.21 |
NECAP writing Results (Female) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP writing Results (Female) - Vermont
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.35 | This school: | 0.35 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.47 | Here: | 0.47 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.39 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.12 | This school: | 0.12 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.30 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Here: | 0.05 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.13 |
NECAP writing Results (Male) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP writing Results (Male) - Vermont
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.05 | This school: | 0.05 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.08 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.41 | Here: | 0.41 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.30 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.30 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.34 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.24 | This school: | 0.24 | | State average from 139 schools: | 0.29 |
NECAP writing Results (FRL) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP writing Results (FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.32 | This school: | 0.32 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.21 | Here: | 0.21 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.37 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.47 | Here: | 0.47 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.32 |
NECAP writing Results (Not FRL) - Manchester Elementarymiddle School NECAP writing Results (Not FRL) - Vermont
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | Here: | 0.23 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.14 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.47 | Here: | 0.47 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.37 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.22 | This school: | 0.22 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 100 schools: | 0.16 |
2006 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 282
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.27 | Here: | 0.27 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.50 | Here: | 0.50 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.11 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.18 |
Female Students tested : 145
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.26 | This school: | 0.26 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.51 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.51 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.12 | Here: | 0.12 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Male Students tested : 137
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.27 | Here: | 0.27 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.48 | Here: | 0.48 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.44 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.15 | Here: | 0.15 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 45
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.38 | This school: | 0.38 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.22 | This school: | 0.22 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.31 | Here: | 0.31 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.28 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 237
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.30 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.30 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.22 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.52 | Here: | 0.52 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.13 |
2006 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 282
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.23 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.15 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.60 | Here: | 0.60 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06 | Here: | 0.06 | | State average from 232 schools: | 0.11 |
Female Students tested : 145
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.29 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.29 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.57 | This school: | 0.57 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested : 137
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.16 | This school: | 0.16 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.11 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.64 | This school: | 0.64 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.52 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.15 | Here: | 0.15 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.23 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.05 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.05 | | State average from 224 schools: | 0.14 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 45
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.44 | Here: | 0.44 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.27 | This school: | 0.27 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.27 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.19 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 237
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.63 | Here: | 0.63 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.18 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 198 schools: | 0.07 |
2006 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 99
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.41 | This school: | 0.41 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.35 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.28 | Here: | 0.28 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.22 | Here: | 0.22 | | State average from 195 schools: | 0.23 |
Female Students tested : 51
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.12 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.12 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.51 | This school: | 0.51 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.18 | This school: | 0.18 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.15 |
Male Students tested : 48
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.08 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.31 | This school: | 0.31 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.30 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.40 | This school: | 0.40 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 136 schools: | 0.30 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 19
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.26 | Here: | 0.26 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.42 | Here: | 0.42 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.31 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.32 | Here: | 0.32 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.36 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 80
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.45 | This school: | 0.45 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.38 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.25 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.25 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.28 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 93 schools: | 0.18 |
2005 Math New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 279
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.22 | This school: | 0.22 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.53 | Here: | 0.53 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.12 | Here: | 0.12 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.17 |
Female Students tested : 146
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.19 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.19 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.55 | Here: | 0.55 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.46 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Male Students tested : 133
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.50 | This school: | 0.50 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.15 | Here: | 0.15 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.11 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.11 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 56
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.08 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.41 | Here: | 0.41 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.40 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.20 | Here: | 0.20 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.30 | Here: | 0.30 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.26 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 223
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.56 | Here: | 0.56 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.13 | Here: | 0.13 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.19 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.07 | Here: | 0.07 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.14 |
2005 Reading New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 279
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.18 | This school: | 0.18 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.54 | Here: | 0.54 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.19 | Here: | 0.19 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.24 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.09 | Here: | 0.09 | | State average from 280 schools: | 0.10 |
Female Students tested : 146
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.23 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.23 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.17 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.54 | Here: | 0.54 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.53 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.14 | Here: | 0.14 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | This school: | 0.08 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.08 |
Male Students tested : 133
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.12 | This school: | 0.12 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.10 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.54 | This school: | 0.54 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.51 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.24 | Here: | 0.24 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.26 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 271 schools: | 0.13 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 56
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.07 | This school: | 0.07 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.06 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.41 | Here: | 0.41 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.45 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.25 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.25 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.27 | Here: | 0.27 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.17 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 223
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.21 | Here: | 0.21 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.16 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.57 | Here: | 0.57 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.56 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.17 | Here: | 0.17 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.21 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 230 schools: | 0.08 |
2005 Writing New England Common Assessment (NECAP) Statistics - Grades 03 - 08:
Students tested : 104
Proportion of Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.08 | This school: | 0.08 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Students Proficient: 0.56 | Here: | 0.56 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.43 |
Proportion of Students Partially Proficient: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.34 |
Proportion of Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.12 | Here: | 0.12 | | State average from 238 schools: | 0.14 |
Female Students tested : 55
Proportion of Female Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.11 | Here: | 0.11 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.13 |
Proportion of Female Students Proficient: 0.66 | This school: | 0.66 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.50 |
Proportion of Female Students Partially Proficient: 0.18 | This school: | 0.18 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.29 |
Proportion of Female Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.06 | Manchester Elementarymiddle School: | 0.06 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.07 |
Male Students tested : 49
Proportion of Male Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.04 | Here: | 0.04 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.05 |
Proportion of Male Students Proficient: 0.45 | This school: | 0.45 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.36 |
Proportion of Male Students Partially Proficient: 0.33 | Here: | 0.33 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.39 |
Proportion of Male Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.18 | Here: | 0.18 | | State average from 173 schools: | 0.20 |
Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 20
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.45 | Here: | 0.45 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.33 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.30 | Here: | 0.30 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.41 |
Proportion of Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.25 | Here: | 0.25 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.22 |
Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students tested : 84
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient with Distinction: 0.10 | Here: | 0.10 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.09 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Proficient: 0.58 | Here: | 0.58 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.48 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Partially Proficient: 0.24 | This school: | 0.24 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.32 |
Proportion of Non Free/Reduced Lunch Price Students Substantially Below Proficient: 0.08 | Here: | 0.08 | | State average from 123 schools: | 0.11 |
|
