Max Bruner Junior Middle School in Fort Walton Beach, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 76.

322 HOLMES BLVD NW
Fort Walton Beach, FL 32548

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Liza Jackson Preparatory School (0.9 miles):

84
Max Bruner Junior Middle School:

76
Addie R. Lewis Middle School (9.8 miles):

74
C. W. Ruckel Middle School (11.7 miles):

65
Holley-Navarre Middle School (15.3 miles):

55
Destin Middle School (12.6 miles):

51
W. C. Pryor Middle School (2.1 miles):

37
Emerald Coast Career Institute S School (0.2 miles):

24
Silver Sands-Excep. Children School (0.2 miles):

20
Max Bruner Junior Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Okaloosa County:

53
Fort Walton Beach:

53
Max Bruner Junior Middle School:

76

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (850) 833-3266 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 46
School number: 651
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: OKALOOSA
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 833-3434
Principal: John Spolski
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
Senate District: 4

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

645
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

26%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 419 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 419 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 399

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 400
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 313 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 313 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 109
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 310
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 310
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 56
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 98
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 78
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

83%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

653
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 438 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 438 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 146
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 431
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 431
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 422
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 336 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 332
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 326

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 332
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 326
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 55 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

94%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

94%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

74%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

80%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

657
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

17%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

25%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 447 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 447 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 145
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 442
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 432

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 442
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 431
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 347 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 347 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 336

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 343
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 335
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 64
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

96%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

62%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

558
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

41%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 953 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 954 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 318
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 888
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 889
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 575 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

98%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 195
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 544
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 544
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 208 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 192
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 391 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 391 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 120
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 363
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 167 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

66%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

450
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

37%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 963 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 964 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 311
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 914
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 916
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 606 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 607 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

99%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 205

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 578
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 580
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 182 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 182 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 174
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 174
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 351 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 86

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 329
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 329
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 49
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 158
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 158
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

444
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

34%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1569
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

50%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

93%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

45%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

350
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

29%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

28%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1733
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

21%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1920
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1494
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

94%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

6
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1373
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

198
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

10%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

80%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

37%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1641
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

374
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

21%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

49%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

26%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

95%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1655
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

46%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1815
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

23%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

83%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1743
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

61%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1863
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

49%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

22%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

81%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1578
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

200
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

31%
State average:

22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1578
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 09%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1897
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

354
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1775
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

323
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1889
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1582
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1705
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1852
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1763
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1854
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1935
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1533
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

187
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 93%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 1
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 146
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 281
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 94%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1619
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1799
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 22
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1742
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

317
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1926
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

229
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

376
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1735
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1811
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

363
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1869
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1929
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1624
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

214
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

140
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

78
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

146
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

676
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

85
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

159
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

691
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

88
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

300
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

287
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

698
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

80
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

292
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

699
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

74
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

14
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

650
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

22
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

637
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 145
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

316
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 66%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 292
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

303
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1769
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1789
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1709
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 80

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1783
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1790
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1737
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 53

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1907
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 84%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1925
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1863
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 62

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1746
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1769
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1712
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 57

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1823
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
MAX BRUNER JUNIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1832
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1743
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 89

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1948
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1962
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1868
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 94

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 312
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 297
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 68
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 337
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 78
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 312
Mean Scale Score
Here:

686
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 10): 7
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 297
Mean Scale Score
Here:

693
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 76
Number Sense (max 9): 5
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 337
Mean Scale Score
Here:

716
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 83
Number Sense (max 9): 7
Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 333
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

314
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 91%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.