|
Back to: McNary, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 23.
Address: 108 N. Pollack
McNary, WI 85930
Grade span: K-8
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 03:30 PM
Principal: Mrs. Mary Ann - Wade
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 334-2293
Fax: (928) 334-2336
Homepage: N/A
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 8
- Grade 4
- Grade 6
- Grade 7
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 93.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| This school: | 93.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2002: 152
Enrollment In 2003: 159
Enrollment In 2004: 135
Enrollment In 2005: 173
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 98.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 92.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 81.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 85.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 14.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 14.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 14.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 14.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 7.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 14
All Students Percent Tested: 108%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 8.0% | | State average from 740 schools: | 9.60% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 12
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 120%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 8.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 6.51% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 616 schools: | 13.35% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 57.67% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 14
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 13
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 46.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 20.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 42.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 16
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 12
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 44.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 14
All Students Percent Tested: 108%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 10.03% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 12
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 120%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 9.44% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 25.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 513 schools: | 7.22% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 21.64% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 639 schools: | 37.42% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 14
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 29.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 13
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 16
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 12
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 78.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 20.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 17.15% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 24.58% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 47.61% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 22.69% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 25.12% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 785 schools: | 43.42% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 13.38% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 22.19% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 51.13% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 70.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 21.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 68.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 26.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 30.71% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 16
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 10.88% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 25.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 841 schools: | 54.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 16.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 40.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 8.61% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 15
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 10
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 586 schools: | 6.04% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 15.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 47.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 65.54% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 12.45% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 12.82% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 40.21% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 679 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 37.80% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 12.59% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 113%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 12.69% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 538 schools: | 9.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 34.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 13.28% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Male Tested: 13
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 13.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 788 schools: | 33.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 21.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 47.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 12.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 20.07% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 16
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 14.02% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 904 schools: | 19.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.29% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 844 schools: | 46.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 10.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 18.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 652 schools: | 20.35% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 697 schools: | 25.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 15
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 40.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 10
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 7.86% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 14.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 782 schools: | 51.28% |
Grade 8
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 111%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.74% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 21.13% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 39.95% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 93%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 21.97% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 399 schools: | 42.48% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 20
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 111%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 23.55% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 21.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 40.71% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 19.98% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 19.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 43.30% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 21.13% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 15
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 511 schools: | 32.52% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 18.95% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 505 schools: | 34.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 10
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 70.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 28.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 19.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 20.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 36.41% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 77.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 47.34% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 362 schools: | 20.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 26.22% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 12
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 534 schools: | 25.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 57.36% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 11
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 515 schools: | 23.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 55.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 62.13% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.77% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 45.81% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 26
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 42.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Female Tested: 12
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 61.61% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 24
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 42.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 67.32% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 6.84% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 111%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 38.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 41.22% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 93%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 77.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 38.00% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 401 schools: | 42.77% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 20
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 111%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 36.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 41.83% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 32.42% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 20.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 43.28% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 15
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 77.0% | | State average from 508 schools: | 37.65% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 507 schools: | 36.60% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 10
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 492 schools: | 34.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 495 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 73.0% | | State average from 370 schools: | 52.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 33.45% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 12
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 518 schools: | 21.77% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 527 schools: | 18.14% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 530 schools: | 47.74% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 439 schools: | 13.42% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 11
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 16.19% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 18.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 51.93% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 433 schools: | 14.94% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 32.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 10.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 22.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 391 schools: | 39.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 296 schools: | 5.94% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 26
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 21.20% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
Female Tested: 12
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 19.66% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 468 schools: | 19.87% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 49.10% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 22.61% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 486 schools: | 17.93% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 490 schools: | 46.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 24
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 17.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 13.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 15.37% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 52.99% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 25.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 25.46% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 54.33% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 15
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 53.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 15.84% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 65.70% |
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 4: | 36.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 14.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 6.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 24.20% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 12.66% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 17.13% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 48.00% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 15
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 26.53% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 617 schools: | 7.06% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 736 schools: | 11.47% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 48.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 4: | 5.0% | | State average from 752 schools: | 34.56% |
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 19
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 715 schools: | 27.02% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 57.22% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 23.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 64.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 6.14% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 17.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 70.84% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 19
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 21.36% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 18.94% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 44.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 14.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 19.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 49.45% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 11.16% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 14.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 50.64% |
Grade 7
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 25
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 9.98% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 25.34% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 572 schools: | 58.10% |
Male Tested: 17
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 41.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 28.21% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 54.12% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 19
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 7.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 23.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 62.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 374 schools: | 5.90% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 66.24% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 25
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 15.30% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 17.48% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 570 schools: | 52.46% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 15.45% |
Male Tested: 17
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 17.35% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 17.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 50.48% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 7: | 6.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 15.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 19
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 11.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 16.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 37.0% | | State average from 559 schools: | 55.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 16.90% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 429 schools: | 9.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 448 schools: | 12.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 56.30% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 22.49% |
|