|
Back to: Avondale, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 31.
Address: 45 S. Third Ave.
Avondale, WI 85323
Schedule: 07:15 AM to 04:00 PM
Principal: Mr. Randy Joseph Watkins
Phone (verify before calling): (623) 772-5100
Fax: (623) 772-5120
Homepage: www.avondale.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 8
- Grade 4
- Grade 6
- Grade 7
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: |  27.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: |  22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| This school: | 95.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 97.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 1
Enrollment In 2002: 973
Enrollment In 2003: 905
Enrollment In 2004: 962
Enrollment In 2005: 888
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 93.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 91.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 91.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 44.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 31.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 51.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 39.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 43.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 26.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 43.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 26.00
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 3
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 86
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 35.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 879 schools: | 11.34% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 40
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 10.42% |
Hispanic Tested: 72
Hispanic Percent Tested: 99%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 15.70% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 31.93% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 49.26% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 78
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 871 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 67
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 591 schools: | 6.46% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 770 schools: | 16.24% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 62.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 600 schools: | 5.24% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 86
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Male Tested: 40
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 830 schools: | 19.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 72
Hispanic Percent Tested: 99%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 607 schools: | 15.23% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 24.80% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 52.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 78
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 67
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 619 schools: | 7.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 757 schools: | 12.62% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 54.52% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 88
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Female Tested: 40
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 8.85% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 22.65% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 60.68% |
Male Tested: 47
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 36.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Hispanic Tested: 75
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 16.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 15.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 695 schools: | 33.01% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 44.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 79
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 70
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 586 schools: | 6.04% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 15.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 65.54% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 86
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 30.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 36.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 19.39% |
Female Tested: 39
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 749 schools: | 12.44% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 851 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 50.29% |
Male Tested: 46
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 20.50% |
Hispanic Tested: 74
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 19.20% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 25.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 46.24% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 611 schools: | 10.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 79
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 21.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 70
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 9.85% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 7.86% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 14.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 782 schools: | 51.28% |
Grade 8
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 84
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Female Tested: 35
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 61.61% |
Male Tested: 49
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 71
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 36.16% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 45.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 77
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 67
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 36.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 45.52% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 17
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 67.32% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 17.48% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 6.84% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 84
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 21.20% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 13.02% |
Female Tested: 35
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 19.66% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 468 schools: | 19.87% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 54.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 49.10% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 12.71% |
Male Tested: 49
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 22.61% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 486 schools: | 17.93% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 490 schools: | 46.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 14.16% |
Hispanic Tested: 71
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 381 schools: | 30.82% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 390 schools: | 23.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 40.30% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 306 schools: | 6.16% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 77
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 17.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 470 schools: | 14.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 67
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 37.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 30.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 23.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 402 schools: | 40.55% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 312 schools: | 5.63% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 17
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 13.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 52.99% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 18.69% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 90
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 10.36% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 845 schools: | 22.62% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 865 schools: | 59.58% |
Male Tested: 44
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 25.46% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 54.33% |
Hispanic Tested: 81
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 608 schools: | 18.28% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 32.79% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 47.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 85
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 45
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 98%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 336 schools: | 51.88% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 334 schools: | 35.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 77
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 17.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 723 schools: | 32.68% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 4: | 39.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 47.45% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 13
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 15.84% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 4: | 54.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 65.70% |
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 14.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 6.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 91
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 24.20% |
Female Tested: 47
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 707 schools: | 11.07% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 17.42% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 49.82% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 24.72% |
Male Tested: 44
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 12.66% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 17.13% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 48.00% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 831 schools: | 24.74% |
Hispanic Tested: 82
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.71% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 677 schools: | 23.03% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 48.80% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 14.15% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 86
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 26.53% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 46
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 329 schools: | 27.32% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 335 schools: | 33.13% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 334 schools: | 36.67% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 77
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 662 schools: | 15.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 23.16% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 48.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 13.53% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 617 schools: | 7.06% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 736 schools: | 11.47% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 48.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 752 schools: | 34.56% |
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 97
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
Female Tested: 38
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 9.26% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 23.38% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 63.79% |
Male Tested: 59
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 715 schools: | 27.02% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 57.22% |
Hispanic Tested: 82
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 489 schools: | 17.34% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 34.44% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 561 schools: | 47.82% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 6.01% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 12
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 352 schools: | 36.66% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 329 schools: | 26.43% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 85
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 23.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 6: | 38.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 64.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 72
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 16.64% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 34.19% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 48.54% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 6: | 16.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 6.14% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 17.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 70.84% |
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 38.01% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 97
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 53.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 727 schools: | 16.52% |
Female Tested: 38
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 53.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 16.96% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 688 schools: | 20.37% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 21.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 47.76% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 17.01% |
Male Tested: 59
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 21.36% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 18.94% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 44.63% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 641 schools: | 16.97% |
Hispanic Tested: 82
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 6: | 54.0% | | State average from 529 schools: | 27.11% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 554 schools: | 24.71% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 558 schools: | 41.42% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 470 schools: | 8.19% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 12
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 352 schools: | 55.42% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 335 schools: | 22.87% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 336 schools: | 20.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 85
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 14.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 19.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 49.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 18.22% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 72
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 27.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 571 schools: | 24.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 41.04% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 6: | 4.0% | | State average from 494 schools: | 7.80% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 11.16% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 14.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 50.64% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 598 schools: | 24.65% |
Grade 7
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 76
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 9.98% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 25.34% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 572 schools: | 58.10% |
Female Tested: 32
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 62.33% |
Male Tested: 44
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Grade 7: | 27.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 28.21% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 54.12% |
Hispanic Tested: 68
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 399 schools: | 47.97% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 68
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 7.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 23.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 62.28% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 53
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 47.98% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 23
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 374 schools: | 5.90% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Grade 7: | 30.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 66.24% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 22.45% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 15.90% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 34.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 34.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 75
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 15.30% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 17.48% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 570 schools: | 52.46% |
Female Tested: 32
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 13.23% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 466 schools: | 17.55% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 81.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 54.67% |
Male Tested: 43
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 17.35% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 17.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 49.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 50.48% |
Hispanic Tested: 67
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 383 schools: | 22.46% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 391 schools: | 22.81% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 396 schools: | 48.14% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 68
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 11.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 16.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 559 schools: | 55.69% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 53
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 98%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 408 schools: | 23.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 74.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 47.75% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 429 schools: | 9.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 448 schools: | 12.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 7: | 36.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 56.30% |
|
