Michigan International Academy School in Fort Myers, Florida (FL)

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories

Find:
Near:

Back to: Fort Myers, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.

City-data.com school rating (weighted overall 2010 test average compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 18.
4312 MICHIGAN AVE
Fort Myers, FL 33905

Michigan International Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	48
Lee County:	52
Fort Myers, FL:	45
Michigan International Academy:	18

Other nearby schools ratings:

Gulf Elementary School (12.3 miles):	85
Caloosa Elementary School (7.1 miles):	74
Orangewood Elementary School (4.4 miles):	66
River Hall Elementary School (8.3 miles):	61
Trafalgar Middle School (12.1 miles):	52
Lee County High Technical Center Central School (0.5 miles):	42
Patriot Elementary School (10.4 miles):	33
Michigan International Academy School:	18
Lee County Superintendent's Office School (3.9 miles):	1

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

Recent posts about schools in Fort Myers, Florida on our local forum with over 1,500,000 registered users:

	Moving to Fort Myers, tips needed on schools... (30 replies)
	How are Lee County Schools? (53 replies)
	FAQ discussion - Schools (8 replies)
	Any good public schools in South Ft. Myers? (0 replies)
	College Grad--New to Fort Myers--Looking to make some friends and find places where a younger crowd hangs out-- (4 replies)
	Cape Coral High Schools (1 reply)

Phone: (239) 334-8411 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 36
School number: 411
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: LEE
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (239) 334-8262
Principal: James Donmoyer
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 14
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 73
Senate District: 37
School Web Address: www.leeschools.net/schools/mic

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	38%
State average from 54 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 54 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	84%
State average from 54 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	31%
State average from 54 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	48%
State average from 54 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 53 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	46%
State average from 54 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	63%
State average from 54 schools:	65%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	461
State average from 54 schools:	539

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 53 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	51%
State average from 54 schools:	60%

Minority Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 54 schools:	57%

Region: 3

Title I: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1214 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1213 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 519
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1147
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1101

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1097
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 538 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 535 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 232
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 514
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 489

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 512
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 484
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 333 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 133
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 314
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 316
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 302
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 265 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 265 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	61%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 248
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 245
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 656 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 658 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 277
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 623
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 599

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 625
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 599
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 55 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	6%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 107
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 99
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	38%
State average from 53 schools:	78%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 52 schools:	76%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	76%
State average from 53 schools:	89%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	29%
State average from 53 schools:	52%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	47%
State average from 52 schools:	69%

Making Math Gains

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	76%
State average from 53 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	47%
State average from 52 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	64%
State average from 52 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	455
State average from 52 schools:	566

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 52 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	46%
State average from 52 schools:	55%

Minority Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 53 schools:	52%

Region: 3

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1223 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1220 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 635
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1150
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1108

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	64%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1147
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1105
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 564 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 564 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 295
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 532
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 520

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	73%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 530
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 516
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 298 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 298 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 264

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 279
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 265
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 283 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 280 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 267
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 255
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 581 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 580 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 274
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 548
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 521

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 547
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 519
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 84
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 88
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	39%
State average from 52 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	67%
State average from 52 schools:	74%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	78%
State average from 52 schools:	84%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	25%
State average from 51 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	50%
State average from 51 schools:	66%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 51 schools:	70%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	46%
State average from 51 schools:	61%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	68%
State average from 51 schools:	69%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	456
State average from 51 schools:	545

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 51 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	40%
State average from 52 schools:	53%

Minority Rate

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	56%
State average from 52 schools:	52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1408 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1406 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 686
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1343
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1255

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1341
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1248
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 660 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 659 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 311
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 629
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 593

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 629
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 591
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 351 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 353 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 182
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 329
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 303

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 330
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 301
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 304 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	86%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 143
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 291
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 270
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 567 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 566 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	91%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 275
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 543
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 504

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 542
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 499
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (89%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 123 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	65%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 60
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	18%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 101
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	42%
State average from 43 schools:	70%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	33%
State average from 43 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	80%
State average from 43 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	15%
State average from 43 schools:	45%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	51%
State average from 43 schools:	65%

Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

Making Math Gains

Here:	50%
State average from 43 schools:	66%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	70%
State average from 43 schools:	64%

% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 43 schools:	68%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns

Here:	403
State average from 43 schools:	531

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 43 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	85%
State average from 43 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	84%
State average from 43 schools:	57%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 421 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 418 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 353
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 352
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	59%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 214 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	94%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 186
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 185
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 119 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 342 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 340 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 82
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 276
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	8%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	55%
State average from 44 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Math

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	50%
State average from 44 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	74%
State average from 44 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	50%
State average from 44 schools:	63%

Making Math Gains

Here:	58%
State average from 44 schools:	68%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	56%
State average from 44 schools:	65%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	343
State average from 44 schools:	418

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 44 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	83%
State average from 44 schools:	51%

Minority Rate

Here:	78%
State average from 44 schools:	56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 400 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 119
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 346
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	44%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 347
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	70%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 47

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	41%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 164
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 165
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	28%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 76
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 315 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 315 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 88

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 272
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	36%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 273
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	26%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 21

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 62
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 63
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 43 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 43 schools:	65%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 43 schools:	80%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	63%
State average from 43 schools:	62%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 43 schools:	67%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	65%
State average from 43 schools:	61%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	412
State average from 43 schools:	400

Percent Tested

Here:	100%
State average from 43 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: B

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	77%
State average from 43 schools:	52%

Minority Rate

Here:	67%
State average from 43 schools:	55%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1413
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	319
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	8%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	33%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	80%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1523
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	18%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	42%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	67%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	18
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1616
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	30%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	36%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	69%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1713
State average:	1716

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	16%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	14

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1803
State average:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	316
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	15%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	24%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	65%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	17
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1838
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	300
State average:	308

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 2

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	29%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	3%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	47%
State average:	52%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1896
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	27%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	38%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	25%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	8%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	36%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	11
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1910
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	53%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	38%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	18%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	30%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	307
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	34%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	10%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	1%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	44%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	23%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	2%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	40%
State average:	41%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	294
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	35%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	26%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	3%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1456
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	334
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	6%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	35%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	37%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	9%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	81%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1466
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	29%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	41%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	9%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	55%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1632
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	31%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	19%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	52%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1649
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	304
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	25%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	51%
State average:	55%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1768
State average:	1786

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	21%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	26%
State average:	20%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	33%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	19%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	52%
State average:	57%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1875
State average:	1892

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	16%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	43%
State average:	38%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 5

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	3%
State average:	10%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	63%
State average:	64%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1914
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	14%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	28%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	39%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	15%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	58%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1979
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	78%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	29%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1354
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1639
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1584
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1638
State average:	1707

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	310

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1704
State average:	1800

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	315

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1765
State average:	1864

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	285
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1899
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1938
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1355
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1529
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1569
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1593
State average:	1679

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1769
State average:	1799

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1795
State average:	1876

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1927
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1984
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 90

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 661

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1345
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1522
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1582
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1566
State average:	1696

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	285
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1728
State average:	1775

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	302
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1795
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1925
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1915
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	298
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 32%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	280
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 23%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1355
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1418
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1607
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	320
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1599
State average:	1670

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	293
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1765
State average:	1801

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1844
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1923
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1977
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	101
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	633
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	61
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	98
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	646
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	65
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	110
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	665
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

Here:	70
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	62
State average:	190

Mean Scale Score

Here:	656
State average from 2604 schools:	671

Median NPR

Here:	50
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	54
State average:	201

Mean Scale Score

Here:	672
State average from 2487 schools:	682

Median NPR

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	58
State average:	66

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Initial Understanding (max 12)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	51
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	46
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	642
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	694
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	61
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	652
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	705
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	63
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 101

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	263
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 48

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	245
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 15%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 69%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 722

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	291
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 74%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1051
State average:	1342

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	259
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1289
State average from 1875 schools:	1542

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	313

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1346
State average:	1546

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1315
State average:	1397

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 31

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1388
State average from 1873 schools:	1629

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	263
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1424
State average:	1632

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1351
State average:	1532

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 73

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1470
State average from 878 schools:	1661

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 77%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1493
State average:	1663

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1437
State average:	1592

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 56

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1572
State average from 808 schools:	1746

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	305

% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1611
State average:	1743

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1574
State average:	1668

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 37

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1681
State average from 819 schools:	1810

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	267
State average:	294

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 24%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1729
State average:	1807

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1659
State average:	1738

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 70

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	237
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	254
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1044
State average:	1413

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	245
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1304
State average from 1874 schools:	1525

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	265
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1331
State average:	1528

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1317
State average:	1414

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 14

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1338
State average from 1872 schools:	1647

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	263
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1438
State average:	1649

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1362
State average:	1519

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 76

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1493
State average from 873 schools:	1641

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	268
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 79%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1521
State average:	1645

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1501
State average:	1620

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 20

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1669
State average from 804 schools:	1777

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	276
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	1673
State average:	1774

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1572
State average:	1645

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 102

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1795
State average from 815 schools:	1851

Mean Scale Score 100-500

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	295
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1804
State average:	1845

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1733
State average:	1755

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 79

Mean Scale Score

Here:	599
State average from 1891 schools:	633

Median NPR: 32
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64

Mean Scale Score

Here:	623
State average from 1874 schools:	642

Median NPR: 44
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 55

Mean Scale Score

Here:	635
State average from 1870 schools:	667

Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74

Mean Scale Score

Here:	647
State average from 874 schools:	671

Median NPR: 40
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65

Mean Scale Score

Here:	658
State average from 796 schools:	675

Median NPR: 45
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 810 schools:	685

Median NPR: 46
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	594
State average from 1891 schools:	632

Median NPR: 36
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 64

Mean Scale Score

Here:	623
State average from 1874 schools:	652

Median NPR: 52
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 52

Mean Scale Score

Here:	633
State average from 1870 schools:	663

Median NPR: 46
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74

Mean Scale Score

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	651
State average from 874 schools:	669

Median NPR: 44
Number Sense (max 10): 5
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 65

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 796 schools:	685

Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 9): 4
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 78

Mean Scale Score

Here:	691
State average from 810 schools:	698

Median NPR: 64
Number Sense (max 9): 6
Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	249
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 63%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 38%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 74

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

MICHIGAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMY:	252
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 73%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 58%