
Back to: Tampa, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.
317 E 124TH AVE
Tampa, FL 33612
Other nearby schools ratings:
Miles Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Hillsborough County:  42  Tampa:  41  Miles Elementary School:  45 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Tampa, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (813) 9757337 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 3041
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 9757099
Principal: Deborah Coyle
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 47
Senate District: 12
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  71%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  70%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  36%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  64%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  69%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  59%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  68%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  530  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  53%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  23%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1230 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1230 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 435
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1184
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1147
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1183
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1146
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 954 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 954 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 338
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 915
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 887
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 914
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 885
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 117 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 114
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 116
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 114
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 37
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 653 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 653 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 223
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 621
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 602
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 620
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 600
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 118
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  43%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 117
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  73%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  71%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  95%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  48%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  69%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  73%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  77%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  68%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  574  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  46%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  25%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1148 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 386
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1120
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1078
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1119
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1077
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 861 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 861 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 300
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 844
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 811
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 843
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 810
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 60
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 57
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 107
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 107
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 43
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 524 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 524 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 174
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 508
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 492
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 507
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 490
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 62
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 138
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 151
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 138
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  70%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  75%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  97%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  46%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  66%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  76%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  65%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  71%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  566  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  42%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  22%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1147 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1144 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 352
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1103
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1079
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1101
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1074
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 893 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 890 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 282
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 867
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 847
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 865
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 843
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 96 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 92
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 39
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 478 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 477 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 442
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 437
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 149 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 131
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 123
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 130
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 120
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  56%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  55%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  68%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  19%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  57%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  74%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  58%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  81%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  468  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: C
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  91%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  78%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 327 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 289
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 289
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 112 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 112 (97%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 34
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 300 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 265
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 264
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 84
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 85
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  53%  State average from 643 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  39%  State average from 643 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  78%  State average from 643 schools:  81% 
Making Reading GainsMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  49%  State average from 643 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsHere:  60%  State average from 643 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  60%  State average from 643 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  339  State average from 643 schools:  420 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 643 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  83%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  75%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 339 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 338 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 93
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 292
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 290
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 90
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 91
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 114 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 39
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 97
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  18%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 95
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 96 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 95 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 81
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 80
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 273 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 272 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 77
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  39%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 235
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 233
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  25%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 63
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 62
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 75
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 76
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  54%  State average from 631 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  44%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  67%  State average from 631 schools:  80% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  51%  State average from 631 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  63%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  49%  State average from 631 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  328  State average from 631 schools:  417 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 631 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: C
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  81%  State average from 631 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  65%  State average from 631 schools:  52% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1204  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  284  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  26%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  26%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  17%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  2%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  48%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1285  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  47%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  32%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1420  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  43%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  18%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  39%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1744  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  44%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  23%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  73%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1856  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  18%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  37%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1915  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  15%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  57%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  279  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  43%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  37%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  18%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  20%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  20%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  46%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  35%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1307  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  28%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  55%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  5 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1318  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  269  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  39%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  26%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  34%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1545  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  27%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  10%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  42%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  7 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1709  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  20%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  22%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  35%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  58%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1833  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  317  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  19%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  22%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6%  State average:  7% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  65%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1926  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  48%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  17%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  74%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1140  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  274  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1359  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  282  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 01%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1434  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  272  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1742  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1834  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1917  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1254  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1414  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1533  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1731  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1842  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1939  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 100
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 3
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 70%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 383
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 92%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1208  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  285  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1353  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1434  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  271  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1714  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1818  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1930  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  307  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1273  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  294  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1360  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  278  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1533  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1698  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1849  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1957  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  97  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  617  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  632  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  113  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  649  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  384  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  677  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Informational (max 18)MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  385  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  689  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Literary (max 18)MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15  State average:  14 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  359  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  696  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Median NPRMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  72  State average:  63 
Literary (max 18)MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 86
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  270  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 74%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 360
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  316  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 61%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 95%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1162  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1349  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  280  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1387  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1266  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 122
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1450  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  274  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1470  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1359  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 111
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  267  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1241  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  287  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000MILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1376  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  282  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1416  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1266  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 151
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1539  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 82%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1557  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1322  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 235
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 112
Mean Scale ScoreMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  612  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 101
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  628  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 49
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  644  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 51
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 112
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  608  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 49
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 99
Mean Scale ScoreMILES ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  634  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 61
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 95
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  645  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 58
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 100
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  267  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 64%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 49%
