|
Back to: Bullhead City, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 27.
Address: 625 Marina Blvd
Bullhead City, WI 86442
Grade span: K-5
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 04:00 PM
Principal: Ms. Vickie J Christensen
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 704-9345
Fax: (928) 704-4977
Homepage: www.mohavelearning.com
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 4
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 92.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 3
Enrollment In 2004: 122
Enrollment In 2005: 142
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 84.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2005: 7.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 11.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 9.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 9.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 7.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Not Evaluated
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 3
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
Female Tested: 11
Female Percent Tested: 92%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 24.30% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 56.93% |
White Tested: 13
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 56.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 15.57% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 699 schools: | 63.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 17
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 8.70% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 88%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 618 schools: | 9.81% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 14.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 59.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 57.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
White Tested: 17
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 680 schools: | 14.66% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 63.77% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 3: | 22.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 59.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 3: | 6.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 863 schools: | 20.62% |
Female Tested: 11
Female Percent Tested: 92%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 811 schools: | 18.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 842 schools: | 52.46% |
White Tested: 13
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 11.45% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 698 schools: | 52.82% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 17
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 9.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 20.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 22.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 88%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 10.72% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 830 schools: | 19.73% |
White Tested: 16
White Percent Tested: 94%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 672 schools: | 11.25% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 55.48% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 29.35% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 17
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 94%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 12.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 95%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 31
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 10.88% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 21.86% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 60.56% |
Male Tested: 18
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 13.43% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 25.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 841 schools: | 54.99% |
Hispanic Tested: 11
Hispanic Percent Tested: 92%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 567 schools: | 17.19% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 665 schools: | 32.71% |
White Tested: 20
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 5.37% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 14.22% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 694 schools: | 67.43% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 30
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 93%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 16.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 10.07% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 8.61% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 24
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 82%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Hispanic Tested: 11
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 15.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 695 schools: | 33.01% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.02% |
White Tested: 10
White Percent Tested: 77%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 19
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 82%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 31
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 14.02% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 904 schools: | 19.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.27% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 36.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 19.81% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 49.58% |
Male Tested: 18
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.23% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 33.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.29% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 844 schools: | 46.18% |
Hispanic Tested: 11
Hispanic Percent Tested: 92%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 20.32% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 30.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 25.58% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 10.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 45.55% |
White Tested: 20
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 568 schools: | 7.62% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 12.76% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 51.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 30
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 10.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 18.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 25
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 93%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 5: | 41.0% | | State average from 652 schools: | 20.35% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 697 schools: | 25.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 24
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 82%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Hispanic Tested: 11
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 19.20% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Grade 5: | 18.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 25.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 46.24% |
White Tested: 10
White Percent Tested: 77%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 19
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 82%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 28
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 46.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 10.36% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 845 schools: | 22.62% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 865 schools: | 59.58% |
White Tested: 15
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 14.35% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 67.26% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 24
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 50.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 81%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 17.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 723 schools: | 32.68% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 43.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 47.45% |
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 5.71% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 28
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 24.20% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 15.0% | | State average from 707 schools: | 11.07% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 17.42% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 15.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 49.82% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 24.72% |
White Tested: 15
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 540 schools: | 6.33% |
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 10.61% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.48% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 35.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 24
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 26.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 81%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 662 schools: | 15.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 23.16% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 48.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 13.53% |
|