Monroe County Transition Center School in Monroe, Michigan (MI)

Back to: Monroe, MI, Michigan, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Michigan forum.

1103 S. RAISINVILLE ROAD
Monroe, MI 48161

County: Monroe
Grade span: 12 - 12

Phone: (734) 242-5799 (make sure to verify first before calling)

Enrollment in Monroe County Transition Center School

2007 Student Enrollment: 10

Female Enrollment : 5
Male Enrollment : 5

12th Grade Enrollment : 10

12th Grade Female Enrollment : 5

12th Grade Male Enrollment : 5

White Enrollment (%): 100.0%

Here:	100.0%
State average from 3483 schools:	70.4%

Genders in Monroe County Transition Center School

2005 Student Enrollment: 7

Female Enrollment : 2
Male Enrollment : 5

11th Grade Enrollment : 1
12th Grade Enrollment : 6

12th Grade Female Enrollment : 2

11th Grade Male Enrollment : 1
12th Grade Male Enrollment : 4

White Enrollment (%): 100.0%

Here:	100.0%
State average from 3644 schools:	70.9%

Genders in Monroe County Transition Center School

Grades in Monroe County Transition Center School

2004 Student Enrollment: 21

Female Enrollment : 8
Male Enrollment : 13

11th Grade Enrollment : 1
12th Grade Enrollment : 20

12th Grade Female Enrollment : 8

11th Grade Male Enrollment : 1
12th Grade Male Enrollment : 12

White Enrollment (%): 100.0%

Here:	100.0%
State average from 3582 schools:	72.3%

Genders in Monroe County Transition Center School

Grades in Monroe County Transition Center School

2003 Student Enrollment: 19

Female Enrollment : 7
Male Enrollment : 12

11th Grade Enrollment : 4
12th Grade Enrollment : 15

11th Grade Female Enrollment : 1
12th Grade Female Enrollment : 6

11th Grade Male Enrollment : 3
12th Grade Male Enrollment : 9

White Enrollment (%): 100.0%

Here:	100.0%
State average from 3497 schools:	73.5%

Genders in Monroe County Transition Center School

Grades in Monroe County Transition Center School

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Statistics:

Met Overall AYP : Yes

School Safety Practices:

Warning codes used to alert faculty of a critical incident : No
Tactical evacuation route for students or entry routes for emergency support teams : Yes
Off-site staging area for assembly and communication at the onset of critical incident : Yes
Emergency communication tree or plan : Yes
Facility blueprints and site plan on file with emergency support team : Yes
Control access to site during school hours (doors locked or monitored) : Yes
Control access to grounds during school hours (gates locked or monitored) : No
Students required to pass through metal detectors each day : No
Visitors required to pass through metal detectors : No
Integrated home-land security in school practices into school safety plans : Yes
Random sweeps for weapons : No
Require clear book bags or ban book bags : No
Require students to wear badges or picture IDs : No
Require staff to wear badges or picture IDs : Yes
Provide staff training in risk assessment : Yes
Security cameras used to monitor the school : No
Telephones provided in most classrooms : Yes
Emergency button provided in lavatories : No
In compliance with the state law that requires that a student who brings a firearm to school be expelled for one year : Yes
In compliance with Elem. and Sec. Edu. Act (ESEA), that requires referral to juvenile delinquency system of any student who brings a firearm to school : Yes
School wide training in positive behavioral support and interventions : Yes

School Safety Plans:

Safety plan exists - Shootings : Yes
Safety plan exists - Riots : Yes
Safety plan exists - Bomb scares or comparable threats (excluding fire) : Yes
Safety plan exists - Disaster planning (tornadoes, floods, chemical spill, etc.) : Yes
Safety plan exists - Hostages : Yes
Safety plan exists - Lock down : Yes

School Prevention Programs:

Implemented a violence prevention curriculum : Yes
Practiced behavior modification/intervention with students : Yes
Provided group counseling (social work) or therapeutic activity for students : Yes
Provided peer mentoring or coaching program : No
Provided peer mediation (student court) in resolving conduct problems : No
Provided conflict resolution training to staff and students : Yes
Provided programs that promote a sense of social integration among students : Yes
Established a hot line for students to report problems : Yes
Provided training and assistance in classroom management to teachers : Yes
Revised or reviewed school wide discipline policy : Yes
Made architectural or environmental modifications to reduce crime or violence : No
Used a paid law enforcement or security service : Yes
Implemented a drug prevention service : No
Conducted community service projects on prevention : No
Implemented teacher/staff training on violence/drug prevention : Yes
Conducted public/parent awareness activities on violence/drug prevention : Yes
Offered after-school or before-school programs : No
Provided alternative education programs : No
Underwent curriculum acquisition or development : No
Provided services for out-of-school youth (school-age) : Yes
Administered special one-time events (not included in the above mentioned programs) : No
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence-prevention services via joint service delivery (including referrals) : Yes
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via teacher/staff training : Yes
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via public awareness activities : Yes
Involved organizations in administering drug and violence prevention services via fund raising : No
Allowed students to participate in the design, delivery or critiquing of a drug or violence prevention program : No
Balanced and restorative justice conferencing (aka transformative conferencing) : No

Attendance Statistics:

Attendance Rate (2005): 91.0%

Here:	91.0%
State average from 3919 schools:	92.3%

Attendance Rate (2004): 91.0%

Here:	91.0%
State average from 3863 schools:	92.4%