Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


Mt Enterprise Elementary School in Mount Enterprise, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 57
Address
 301 NW 3RD ST
Mount Enterprise, TX 75681
Telephone
(903) 822-3545
(make sure to verify first before calling)
Website
http://www.meisd.org
City-data.com school rating
57
Students
202
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
14.9
Free lunch eligible students
107
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
8
School district
MOUNT ENTERPRISE ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Title I schoolwide school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CENTRAL HEIGHTS EL (14.9 miles):

88
CENTRAL HEIGHTS MIDDLE (14.9 miles):

86
CENTRAL HEIGHTS H S (14.9 miles):

73
GARRISON EL (13.3 miles):

71
LANEVILLE SCHOOL (8.4 miles):

67
CUSHING SCHOOL (11.3 miles):

59
Mt Enterprise Elementary School:

57
CUSHING EL (11.2 miles):

44
MT ENTERPRISE H S (0.0 miles):

26
Mt Enterprise Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Rusk County:

55
Mount Enterprise:

42
Mt Enterprise Elementary School:

57

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 202
Enrollment in 2015: 210
Enrollment in 2014: 184
Enrollment in 2013: 186
Enrollment in 2012: 157
Enrollment in 2011: 187
Enrollment in 2010: 189
Enrollment in 2009: 189
Enrollment in 2008: 176
Enrollment in 2007: 213
Enrollment in 2006: 230
Enrollment in 2005: 235
Enrollment in 2004: 222
Enrollment in 2003: 223
Enrollment in 2002: 229
Enrollment in 2001: 246
Enrollment in 2000: 231
Enrollment in 1999: 224

Mt Enterprise Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students24223627432129202
Female students1252314251416109
Male students121713131871393
Asian students - - 1 - - 1 - 2
Hispanic students234342119
Black students532341624
White students17142620351722151
Two or More Races students - 231 - - - 6

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 24
Kindergarten enrollment: 22
1st grade enrollment: 36
2nd grade enrollment: 27
3rd grade enrollment: 43
4th grade enrollment: 21
5th grade enrollment: 29

Mt Enterprise Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 109 (54.0%)
Here:

54.0%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 93 (46.0%)
Here:

46.0%
Texas:

50.1%

Mt Enterprise Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 2 (1.0%)
Mt Enterprise Elementary School:

1.0%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 19 (9.4%)
Here:

9.4%
Texas:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 24 (11.9%)
Here:

11.9%
State:

11.6%
White enrollment: 151 (74.8%)
Here:

74.8%
Texas:

32.3%
Two or More Races enrollment: 6 (3.0%)
Mt Enterprise Elementary School:

3.0%
Texas:

2.1%

Mt Enterprise Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 115 (56.9%)
Here:

56.9%
Texas:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 107 (53.0%)
School:

53.0%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 8 (4.0%)
School:

4.0%
Texas:

6.2%

Mt Enterprise Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 14.9

Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 2.5
Number of FTE school counselors: 0.5
Number of FTE teachers who were absent more than 10 school days during the school years: 1

Student/Teacher Ratio
School:

13.5
State:

15.6

Mt Enterprise Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $768,405
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 12.5 (Salary Expenditures: $514,825)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 3.5 (Salary Expenditures: $28,340)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $77,822)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 3 (Salary Expenditures: $147,418)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $66,437
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $913,954
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $598,172
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 6.5 (Salary Expenditures: $90,542)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $77,822)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $147,418)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $82,420

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 9 (male: 4, female: 5)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 2, female: 5)
  • Asian: 2 (all male)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 20 (male: 10, female: 10)
  • White: 20 (male: 10, female: 10)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)
  • White: 10 (male: 2, female: 8)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 3,162 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 1st grade: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2

Percent of 1st grade students retained
School:

5.6%
Texas:

6.1%

Total number of students retained in 2nd grade: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Percent of 2nd grade students retained
School:

14.8%
State:

4.8%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic2
  • Asian2
  • Black2
  • White16
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 22 (male: 8, female: 14)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • Asian: 2 (all female)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
School:

108.9
State:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,417
  • Males1,426
  • Females1,411
  • White1,430
Math Average Scale Score:

1,417
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 35
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 35

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (58%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.9 (61%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 3.9 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.5 (61%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 40%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%

31%
40%
18%
11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,426, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 14%)
36%
28%
22%
14%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,411, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 29%, Approaches: 47%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 10%)
29%
47%
14%
10%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,430, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 27%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 13%)
27%
40%
20%
13%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,425
  • Males1,412
  • Females1,434
  • White1,437
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,425
Texas:

1,423
Reading students tested: 35
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 35

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 3.8 (76%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 9.7 (64%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.9 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 34%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 23%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 17%

26%
34%
23%
17%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,412, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 21%)
36%
28%
15%
21%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,434, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 19%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 14%)
19%
38%
29%
14%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,437, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 23%, Masters: 20%)
20%
37%
23%
20%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,618
  • Males1,589
  • Females1,647
  • White1,636
Math Average Scale Score:

1,618
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 24
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.3 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 7.9 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.3 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 21%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 50%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 21%

8%
21%
50%
21%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,589, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 59%, Masters: 8%)
17%
16%
59%
8%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,647, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 33%)
25%
42%
33%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,636, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 25%)
6%
19%
50%
25%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,566
  • Males1,586
  • Females1,545
  • White1,597
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,566
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 24
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.6 (83%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.5 (70%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10 (77%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 42%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 29%

4%
42%
25%
29%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,586, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 42%)
42%
16%
42%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,545, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%, Approaches: 42%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
8%
42%
33%
17%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,597, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 38%)
6%
19%
37%
38%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All3,642
  • Males3,514
  • Females3,770
  • White3,633
Writing Average Scale Score:

3,642
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 24
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 24

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.2 (52%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 3.7 (46%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (64%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 34%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 4%

38%
25%
34%
4%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,514, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
42%
33%
25%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,770, Tested: 12, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 8%)
33%
17%
42%
8%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,633, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 6%)
38%
25%
32%
6%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,655
  • Males1,623
  • Females1,682
  • Black1,512
  • White1,681
Math Average Scale Score:

1,655
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 38
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 38

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (73%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.7 (75%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (68%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 8%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 26%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 27%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 39%

8%
26%
27%
39%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 12%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 35%, Masters: 24%)
12%
29%
35%
24%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,682, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 52%)
5%
24%
19%
52%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,512, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
60%
20%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,681, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 23%, Meets: 34%, Masters: 43%)
23%
34%
43%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,548
  • Males1,498
  • Females1,588
  • Black1,443
  • White1,568
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,548
State:

1,546
Reading students tested: 38
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 38

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.7 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8.7 (62%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 26%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 32%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 26%

26%
32%
16%
26%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,498, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 41%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 18%)
41%
41%
18%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,588, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 14%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 33%)
14%
24%
29%
33%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,443, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
80%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,568, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 27%)
17%
40%
16%
27%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All3,569
  • Males3,438
  • Females3,675
  • Black3,298
  • White3,644
Science Average Scale Score:

3,569
Texas:

3,771
Science students tested: 38
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 38

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4 (67%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5 (63%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.6 (56%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.6 (55%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 13%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%

47%
37%
13%
3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,438, Tested: 17, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 0%)
59%
35%
6%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,675, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 5%)
38%
38%
19%
5%
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,298, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
80%
20%
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,644, Tested: 30, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 43%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 3%)
40%
43%
14%
3%

Health & Safety


Corporal Punishment:
Show data for

This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 17 (male: 13, female: 4)
  • Black: 2 (all male)
  • White: 13 (male: 11, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

Students with disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic2
  • White4
  • IDEA4
  • 5042
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 6 (male: 2, female: 4)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all female)
  • White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 2 (all female)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Mt Enterprise Elementary School:

29.7
State:

147.9

Suspensions:
Show data for

(State average from 3,231 schools)

Out-of-school suspension
  • For students with disabilities served under IDEA : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his/her regular school for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes to another setting (e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include both removals in which no individualized family service plan(IFSP) or individualized education plan(IEP) services are provided because the removal is 10 days or less as well as removals in which the child continues to receive services according to his/her IFSP or IEP.
  • For students without disabilities and students with disabilities served solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act : Out-of-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his / her regular school for at least half a day(but less than the remainder of the school year) for disciplinary purposes to another setting(e.g., home, behavior center).Out-of-school suspensions include removals in which no educational services are provided, and removals in which educational services are provided(e.g., school-provided at home instruction or tutoring).
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Instances of out-of-school suspension (All preschool students): 1

Instances of out-of-school suspension per 1,000 students (All preschool students)
School:

5.0
State:

1.4
Preschool children receiving only one out-of-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

    Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension

  • Hispanic2
  • Black4
  • White7
  • Multirace2
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 15 (male: 9, female: 6)
  • Hispanic: 2 (all male)
  • Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all female)

Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 2 (all male)
  • Hispanic: 2
  • Section 504: 4

Comments


Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Mount Enterprise, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2024 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents