All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Cold Springs, NV
Nancy Gomes Elementary School in Cold Springs, Nevada (NV)
Nancy Gomes Elementary School in Cold Springs, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Nevada) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is
55 .
Address:
Principal: Lisa Hansen
Phone Number (Verify before using): (775) 677-5440
Fax Number (Verify before using): (775) 677-5435
Website: www.washoe.k12.nv.us
Title I School: No
AYP School Designation: Watch
Special Programs: Class-Size Reduction: Yes
Other nearby schools ratings:
Nancy Gomes Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings: Nevada:
43Washoe County:
47Cold Springs:
42Nancy Gomes Elementary School:
55
Adequate Yearly Progress English Language Arts School English Language Arts AYP Designation: Watch
Participation Hispanic:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%All Students:
99.5%White:
99.4%Individual Education Plan Students:
98.0%
Percent Proficient White:
89.7%All Students:
86.9%Hispanic:
79.5%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
77.9%Individual Education Plan Students:
65.3%
Math School Math AYP Designation: Watch
Participation Hispanic:
100.0%Limited English Proficiency Students:
100.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
100.0%All Students:
99.5%White:
99.4%Individual Education Plan Students:
98.0%
Percent Proficient White:
79.5%All Students:
75.2%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
64.7%Hispanic:
64.1%Individual Education Plan Students:
46.9%
Average Daily Attendance School Average Daily Attendance AYP Designation: Adequate
Black:
96.7%Asian:
96.6%Pacific Islander:
96.3%Individual Education Plan Students:
96.3%Two or more Races:
96.1%White:
95.7%All Students:
95.6%Hispanic:
95.1%Limited English Proficiency Students:
95.0%Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students:
94.9%American Indian:
93.8%
Discuss this school with others on our active
Nevada Forum
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 3
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
1.8%State:
10.3%
Approaches Standard This School:
8.9%Nevada:
20.3%
Nancy Gomes Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 113 23.4% 3.5% 1.8% 10.3% 8.9% 20.3% 31.3% 31.9% 58.0% 37.5%
Male 65 24.9% 3.8% 1.5% 11.1% 7.7% 19.2% 32.3% 30.7% 58.5% 39.0%
Female 48 21.3% 3.2% 2.1% 9.5% 10.6% 21.5% 29.8% 33.1% 57.5% 36.0%
Hispanic 22 15.9% -2.7% 4.6% 12.5% 13.6% 24.3% 27.3% 33.0% 54.6% 30.2%
White 80 26.5% 13.5% 1.3% 6.0% 6.3% 14.6% 34.2% 31.5% 58.2% 47.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 24 3.7% -23.7% 4.4% 30.4% 26.1% 27.4% 39.1% 23.4% 30.4% 18.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 16.5% -4.6% 2.9% 13.9% 14.7% 24.8% 20.6% 32.6% 61.8% 28.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 23.9% 0.4% 3.4% 11.5% 6.8% 22.2% 40.7% 34.9% 49.2% 31.4%
Male 65 23.3% 0.7% 0.0% 11.6% 10.8% 21.7% 41.5% 33.9% 47.7% 32.8%
Female 53 24.7% 0.1% 7.5% 11.3% 1.9% 22.7% 39.6% 35.9% 50.9% 30.0%
Hispanic 17 16.5% -6.3% 11.8% 14.1% 5.9% 26.4% 41.2% 35.7% 41.2% 23.9%
White 95 24.6% 9.8% 2.1% 6.9% 7.4% 17.5% 38.9% 35.9% 51.6% 39.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 6.3% -27.5% 11.1% 32.5% 16.7% 29.1% 38.9% 23.6% 33.3% 14.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 3.3% -10.5% 15.4% 15.8% 15.4% 28.7% 30.8% 35.5% 38.5% 19.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 42 17.4% -8.4% 7.1% 15.5% 9.5% 26.9% 47.6% 34.5% 35.7% 23.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 125 5.3% 4.2% 2.4% 6.5% 36.0% 33.0% 39.2% 31.3% 22.4% 29.2%
Male 65 12.9% 6.0% 1.5% 6.6% 29.2% 31.0% 43.1% 31.3% 26.2% 31.1%
Female 60 -3.0% 2.2% 3.3% 6.4% 43.3% 35.1% 35.0% 31.3% 18.3% 27.2%
Hispanic 26 -2.5% -4.0% 0.0% 8.1% 46.2% 39.6% 38.5% 30.3% 15.4% 22.0%
White 89 5.5% 14.7% 2.2% 3.7% 36.0% 25.3% 38.2% 33.2% 23.6% 37.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -17.0% -22.6% 7.1% 22.2% 53.6% 44.1% 39.3% 20.6% 0.0% 13.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 14 -20.6% -8.6% 0.0% 9.2% 64.3% 43.1% 28.6% 29.8% 7.1% 17.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 -2.5% -5.3% 5.1% 9.2% 41.0% 39.8% 33.3% 29.9% 20.5% 21.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 126 6.4% 3.6% 3.2% 8.3% 34.1% 31.7% 34.9% 35.6% 27.8% 24.4%
Male 52 9.1% 4.0% 1.9% 8.6% 32.7% 31.1% 42.3% 34.8% 23.1% 25.4%
Female 74 4.5% 3.3% 4.1% 8.0% 35.1% 32.4% 29.7% 36.3% 31.1% 23.2%
Hispanic 26 5.2% -5.3% 3.8% 10.4% 34.6% 38.6% 42.3% 34.5% 19.2% 16.5%
White 84 5.6% 13.8% 2.4% 5.0% 35.7% 24.9% 31.0% 37.5% 31.0% 32.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -9.9% -23.5% 10.7% 25.9% 42.9% 41.3% 25.0% 21.9% 21.4% 11.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 -3.9% -9.2% 9.5% 12.0% 38.1% 41.0% 33.3% 33.6% 19.0% 13.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 37 -10.4% -6.7% 5.4% 12.0% 48.6% 38.4% 21.6% 33.6% 24.3% 16.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 125 14.0% 12.4% 4.8% 8.8% 37.9% 35.5% 41.1% 33.7% 16.1% 22.1%
Male 67 23.4% 13.0% 6.1% 9.6% 27.3% 34.2% 47.0% 32.6% 19.7% 23.7%
Female 58 3.3% 11.9% 3.4% 8.0% 50.0% 36.9% 34.5% 34.8% 12.1% 20.3%
Hispanic 29 -0.4% 3.1% 7.1% 11.3% 50.0% 42.3% 39.3% 31.6% 3.6% 14.8%
White 87 16.5% 23.4% 4.6% 5.0% 35.6% 28.3% 40.2% 36.8% 19.5% 30.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -13.3% -12.3% 30.0% 25.8% 40.0% 43.1% 30.0% 19.4% 0.0% 11.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -3.3% -3.5% 5.0% 13.7% 55.0% 46.6% 35.0% 28.4% 5.0% 11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -2.7% 2.2% 6.3% 12.3% 53.1% 42.2% 34.4% 31.2% 6.3% 14.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 -0.5% 5.1% 8.5% 10.8% 46.6% 38.7% 33.1% 32.2% 11.9% 18.3%
Male 58 -0.6% 5.6% 6.9% 11.5% 48.3% 37.6% 29.3% 32.0% 15.5% 18.9%
Female 61 -0.4% 4.7% 10.0% 10.1% 45.0% 39.8% 36.7% 32.4% 8.3% 17.7%
Hispanic 20 4.6% -6.7% 5.0% 14.5% 45.0% 46.8% 25.0% 27.8% 25.0% 10.9%
White 93 0.3% 17.4% 7.6% 6.0% 46.7% 31.2% 35.9% 37.2% 9.8% 25.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 -23.2% -17.8% 16.7% 28.4% 61.1% 44.0% 11.1% 18.9% 11.1% 8.7%
Limited English Proficiency Students 12 -3.7% -15.4% 8.3% 18.1% 50.0% 51.9% 25.0% 23.1% 16.7% 6.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 -10.6% -7.6% 13.0% 15.7% 52.2% 46.5% 8.7% 27.2% 26.1% 10.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 112 24.2% 5.6% 2.7% 11.8% 27.7% 37.3% 33.0% 28.4% 36.6% 22.6%
Male 61 26.7% 7.5% 3.3% 11.9% 24.6% 35.2% 29.5% 28.2% 42.6% 24.6%
Female 51 21.3% 3.9% 2.0% 11.4% 31.4% 39.3% 37.3% 28.6% 29.4% 20.7%
Hispanic 16 23.4% -7.0% 0.0% 16.1% 31.3% 45.5% 50.0% 25.6% 18.8% 12.9%
White 88 25.1% 17.6% 3.4% 6.9% 26.1% 30.1% 31.8% 31.6% 38.6% 31.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 12 -3.7% -19.1% 16.7% 29.6% 41.7% 44.2% 41.7% 16.2% 0.0% 10.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 6.3% -7.2% 6.9% 16.9% 41.4% 45.0% 27.6% 25.1% 24.1% 13.1%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 105 23.6% 10.4% 3.8% 12.3% 38.1% 42.7% 27.6% 24.5% 30.5% 20.4%
Male 56 22.6% 11.8% 7.1% 13.1% 35.7% 40.6% 30.4% 24.7% 26.8% 21.6%
Female 46 24.2% 9.1% 0.0% 11.5% 41.3% 44.9% 26.1% 24.3% 32.6% 19.3%
Hispanic 12 32.2% -2.9% 8.3% 17.8% 25.0% 50.6% 33.3% 19.9% 33.3% 11.6%
White 83 22.1% 22.2% 3.6% 7.0% 39.8% 36.3% 28.9% 28.8% 27.7% 28.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 12 -26.2% -12.5% 25.0% 30.5% 66.7% 47.5% 0.0% 14.2% 8.3% 7.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 46.5% -2.6% 4.8% 17.7% 14.3% 50.4% 38.1% 20.2% 42.9% 11.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 4
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
1.9%State:
7.2%
Approaches Standard This School:
14.8%State:
23.3%
Exceeds Standard This School:
14.8%State:
14.1%
Nancy Gomes Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 108 17.4% 3.6% 1.9% 7.2% 14.8% 23.3% 68.5% 55.4% 14.8% 14.1%
Male 60 17.4% 3.2% 0.0% 7.7% 16.7% 23.3% 70.0% 55.0% 13.3% 14.1%
Female 48 17.4% 4.0% 4.2% 6.6% 12.5% 23.4% 66.7% 55.9% 16.7% 14.1%
Hispanic 18 6.3% -3.0% 0.0% 8.8% 27.8% 28.2% 66.7% 53.9% 5.6% 9.0%
White 82 20.7% 12.5% 2.4% 4.2% 11.0% 17.5% 68.3% 58.9% 18.3% 19.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 15 -25.9% -25.9% 13.3% 24.5% 46.7% 35.4% 33.3% 35.3% 6.7% 4.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -11.3% -5.3% 0.0% 9.8% 45.5% 29.6% 54.6% 52.1% 0.0% 8.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 5.9% -4.5% 2.6% 9.9% 25.6% 28.7% 59.0% 52.8% 12.8% 8.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 122 12.0% 0.5% 0.8% 8.0% 21.3% 25.6% 66.4% 57.5% 11.5% 8.9%
Male 61 16.1% -0.3% 1.6% 8.5% 16.4% 25.9% 67.2% 56.2% 14.8% 9.5%
Female 61 7.9% 1.3% 0.0% 7.5% 26.2% 25.2% 65.6% 58.9% 8.2% 8.4%
Hispanic 25 22.1% -6.8% 0.0% 9.6% 12.0% 31.3% 68.0% 53.9% 20.0% 5.2%
White 91 8.8% 9.8% 0.0% 5.0% 25.3% 19.3% 65.9% 62.9% 8.8% 12.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 25 -1.9% -30.1% 4.0% 26.0% 32.0% 38.2% 64.0% 32.9% 0.0% 2.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 15 14.1% -17.1% 0.0% 13.1% 20.0% 38.2% 66.7% 46.5% 13.3% 2.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 40 1.6% -9.1% 2.5% 11.4% 30.0% 31.9% 55.0% 51.8% 12.5% 5.0%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 -1.8% 8.0% 4.9% 8.1% 40.7% 27.6% 27.6% 32.4% 26.8% 31.9%
Male 50 -2.3% 7.6% 4.0% 8.4% 42.0% 27.7% 32.0% 32.1% 22.0% 31.8%
Female 73 -1.5% 8.3% 5.5% 7.8% 39.7% 27.6% 24.7% 32.7% 30.1% 32.0%
Hispanic 21 -23.0% 0.0% 9.5% 10.3% 57.1% 33.4% 28.6% 32.4% 4.8% 23.9%
White 89 -0.1% 17.0% 3.4% 4.9% 40.4% 21.8% 27.0% 32.9% 29.2% 40.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 25 -20.3% -22.2% 16.0% 27.9% 48.0% 38.1% 20.0% 22.2% 16.0% 11.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 12 -31.3% -9.5% 16.7% 13.9% 58.3% 39.3% 25.0% 30.4% 0.0% 16.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 55 -16.3% -1.7% 5.5% 11.4% 54.5% 34.0% 25.5% 31.7% 14.5% 22.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 128 11.4% 9.9% 5.5% 9.3% 26.8% 24.5% 39.4% 38.7% 28.3% 27.4%
Male 67 11.9% 9.5% 9.1% 10.2% 22.7% 24.0% 28.8% 38.1% 39.4% 27.7%
Female 61 10.9% 10.3% 1.6% 8.4% 31.1% 25.1% 50.8% 39.4% 16.4% 27.2%
Hispanic 29 9.2% 2.1% 6.9% 11.8% 27.6% 29.8% 41.4% 38.8% 24.1% 19.6%
White 86 11.1% 19.0% 4.7% 5.7% 27.9% 19.0% 38.4% 39.8% 29.1% 35.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 2.5% -19.7% 23.5% 30.0% 17.6% 33.5% 41.2% 25.6% 17.6% 11.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 6.2% -7.4% 6.3% 15.4% 31.3% 35.7% 37.5% 36.2% 25.0% 12.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 4.3% -0.1% 9.1% 13.3% 30.3% 30.5% 51.5% 37.5% 9.1% 18.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 124 26.9% 21.0% 5.6% 9.9% 24.2% 25.8% 44.4% 35.6% 25.8% 28.7%
Male 58 30.8% 20.3% 6.9% 10.8% 19.0% 25.6% 39.7% 34.6% 34.5% 29.0%
Female 66 23.4% 21.8% 4.5% 8.9% 28.8% 26.0% 48.5% 36.7% 18.2% 28.4%
Hispanic 25 24.7% 11.5% 8.0% 13.4% 24.0% 31.8% 44.0% 35.0% 24.0% 19.7%
White 94 26.9% 31.5% 5.3% 5.3% 24.5% 19.8% 43.6% 37.3% 26.6% 37.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 22 6.7% -8.5% 18.2% 29.9% 31.8% 35.3% 31.8% 23.3% 18.2% 11.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 11.2% -1.2% 18.2% 18.9% 27.3% 38.9% 36.4% 30.7% 18.2% 11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 18.8% 10.4% 10.3% 14.5% 27.6% 31.8% 37.9% 34.8% 24.1% 18.9%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Mathematics Grade 5 Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 131 10.3% 9.3% 5.3% 8.2% 38.9% 37.2% 47.3% 41.5% 8.4% 13.2%
Male 69 9.7% 7.9% 7.2% 9.2% 37.7% 37.6% 49.3% 40.9% 5.8% 12.4%
Female 62 11.1% 10.7% 3.2% 7.2% 40.3% 36.7% 45.2% 42.0% 11.3% 14.1%
Hispanic 19 12.5% -2.0% 0.0% 10.6% 42.1% 46.0% 57.9% 36.1% 0.0% 7.3%
White 96 8.8% 20.8% 6.3% 5.0% 39.6% 28.9% 45.8% 47.7% 8.3% 18.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 -26.6% -24.6% 6.3% 29.6% 75.0% 49.6% 18.8% 18.1% 0.0% 2.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 -1.9% -4.3% 4.3% 12.2% 52.2% 46.7% 30.4% 34.5% 13.0% 6.6%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 9.1% 5.1% 2.4% 9.2% 43.1% 40.3% 41.5% 38.1% 13.0% 12.4%
Male 57 0.2% 3.8% 3.5% 10.8% 50.9% 40.0% 35.1% 37.1% 10.5% 12.1%
Female 66 16.7% 6.7% 1.5% 7.5% 36.4% 40.4% 47.0% 39.3% 15.2% 12.7%
Hispanic 23 -10.6% -8.3% 8.7% 12.6% 56.5% 50.4% 30.4% 31.2% 4.3% 5.9%
White 89 8.5% 17.5% 1.1% 5.5% 44.9% 31.7% 37.1% 44.7% 16.9% 18.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 -39.1% -27.4% 18.8% 32.2% 75.0% 49.7% 6.3% 15.2% 0.0% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 27 -8.4% -8.8% 0.0% 13.6% 63.0% 49.8% 37.0% 30.6% 0.0% 6.0%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 101 16.0% 15.2% 3.0% 8.4% 46.5% 41.9% 41.4% 39.7% 9.1% 10.0%
Male 44 20.3% 13.3% 2.4% 9.7% 42.9% 42.4% 42.9% 37.6% 11.9% 10.2%
Female 56 11.9% 17.3% 3.6% 6.8% 50.0% 41.4% 39.3% 41.9% 7.1% 9.9%
White 84 16.1% 26.1% 3.6% 5.2% 45.8% 34.2% 41.0% 46.3% 9.6% 14.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 17.5% 2.2% 8.0% 12.4% 40.0% 50.9% 52.0% 32.2% 0.0% 4.5%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 3
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Nancy Gomes Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective
All Students
This School : 13.9%Nevada : -5.5%
Male
This School : 7.0%Nevada : -8.6%
Individual Education Plan Students
This School : -11.6%Nevada : -53.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students
This School : 12.7%Nevada : -16.9%
Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 113 13.9% -5.5% 8.9% 21.5% 13.4% 20.2% 33.9% 32.6% 43.8% 25.7%
Male 65 7.0% -8.6% 9.2% 24.2% 20.0% 20.6% 33.9% 31.8% 36.9% 23.4%
Female 48 23.4% -2.3% 8.5% 18.7% 4.3% 19.8% 34.0% 33.5% 53.2% 28.0%
Hispanic 22 -4.7% -16.6% 13.6% 28.9% 27.3% 23.9% 40.9% 30.8% 18.2% 16.4%
White 80 19.7% 7.9% 5.1% 12.6% 11.4% 15.7% 32.9% 35.2% 50.6% 36.6%
Individual Education Plan Students 24 -11.6% -53.7% 30.4% 73.8% 17.4% 16.1% 26.1% 7.1% 26.1% 3.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 12.7% -16.9% 11.8% 29.2% 11.8% 23.8% 41.2% 30.8% 35.3% 16.2%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 11.6% -3.0% 0.0% 3.4% 24.6% 35.8% 33.9% 34.7% 41.5% 26.1%
Male 65 13.1% -6.5% 0.0% 4.0% 23.1% 38.7% 36.9% 33.3% 40.0% 24.0%
Female 53 9.8% 0.7% 0.0% 2.8% 26.4% 32.7% 30.2% 36.1% 43.4% 28.4%
Hispanic 17 -10.9% -13.9% 0.0% 4.6% 47.1% 45.5% 23.5% 33.8% 29.4% 16.1%
White 95 16.2% 9.2% 0.0% 1.9% 20.0% 25.1% 34.7% 36.2% 45.3% 36.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 -19.4% -52.1% 0.0% 20.6% 55.6% 67.7% 16.7% 8.6% 27.8% 3.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 13 -25.3% -22.2% 0.0% 5.5% 61.5% 52.8% 15.4% 31.5% 23.1% 10.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 42 -4.3% -14.1% 0.0% 4.9% 40.5% 45.4% 35.7% 33.1% 23.8% 16.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 125 15.5% 8.3% 4.0% 4.4% 28.8% 35.5% 38.4% 37.2% 28.8% 22.9%
Male 65 19.1% 4.7% 3.1% 5.6% 26.2% 38.0% 40.0% 35.5% 30.8% 20.9%
Female 60 11.6% 12.2% 5.0% 3.2% 31.7% 32.8% 36.7% 38.9% 26.7% 25.0%
Hispanic 26 6.0% -3.3% 0.0% 6.3% 42.3% 45.3% 34.6% 34.7% 23.1% 13.7%
White 89 18.0% 21.6% 5.6% 2.4% 24.7% 24.3% 41.6% 40.2% 28.1% 33.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -5.3% -24.6% 7.1% 19.2% 46.4% 53.7% 42.9% 20.0% 3.6% 7.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 14 -1.7% -11.9% 0.0% 7.8% 50.0% 52.5% 42.9% 32.3% 7.1% 7.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 9.8% -3.8% 2.6% 6.5% 35.9% 45.6% 33.3% 34.6% 28.2% 13.3%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 126 10.2% 6.9% 4.8% 6.1% 33.3% 35.3% 38.1% 33.5% 23.8% 25.1%
Male 52 6.0% 3.2% 3.8% 7.1% 38.5% 38.0% 42.3% 32.4% 15.4% 22.5%
Female 74 13.2% 10.8% 5.4% 5.1% 29.7% 32.5% 35.1% 34.7% 29.7% 27.7%
Hispanic 26 -9.4% -5.6% 3.8% 8.9% 53.8% 45.0% 26.9% 31.2% 15.4% 15.0%
White 84 16.2% 19.8% 6.0% 3.5% 26.2% 25.0% 42.9% 36.0% 25.0% 35.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 28 -16.0% -25.4% 17.9% 23.2% 46.4% 50.5% 25.0% 16.4% 10.7% 10.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 21 -18.4% -14.3% 4.8% 11.2% 61.9% 51.4% 19.0% 28.6% 14.3% 8.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 37 -3.1% -5.8% 2.7% 9.0% 48.6% 45.2% 35.1% 31.0% 13.5% 14.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 125 23.6% 19.7% 2.4% 7.0% 34.4% 33.7% 52.8% 43.1% 10.4% 16.2%
Male 67 18.6% 15.5% 4.5% 8.6% 37.3% 36.3% 43.3% 40.6% 14.9% 14.5%
Female 58 29.4% 24.1% 0.0% 5.4% 31.0% 30.9% 63.8% 45.7% 5.2% 18.0%
Hispanic 29 1.8% 7.4% 3.4% 10.2% 55.2% 42.9% 41.4% 38.6% 0.0% 8.4%
White 87 29.4% 32.6% 2.3% 3.9% 28.7% 24.0% 54.0% 47.9% 14.9% 24.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 10 -29.6% -10.3% 20.0% 24.6% 70.0% 46.1% 10.0% 22.4% 0.0% 6.9%
Limited English Proficiency Students 20 -9.6% -3.6% 0.0% 13.4% 70.0% 50.6% 30.0% 31.9% 0.0% 4.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 33 -0.2% 6.5% 3.0% 10.5% 57.6% 43.4% 39.4% 37.6% 0.0% 8.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 119 15.0% 11.3% 5.9% 10.7% 39.5% 38.4% 28.6% 29.5% 26.1% 21.4%
Male 58 17.3% 7.5% 8.6% 12.6% 34.5% 40.3% 37.9% 27.4% 19.0% 19.7%
Female 61 12.9% 15.2% 3.3% 8.8% 44.3% 36.4% 19.7% 31.7% 32.8% 23.1%
Hispanic 20 15.4% -3.3% 10.0% 16.4% 35.0% 47.2% 30.0% 25.1% 25.0% 11.3%
White 93 15.2% 25.1% 5.4% 5.7% 39.8% 29.6% 28.0% 33.5% 26.9% 31.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 -11.8% -17.1% 22.2% 32.2% 50.0% 45.3% 22.2% 14.5% 5.6% 8.0%
Limited English Proficiency Students 12 10.4% -15.3% 16.7% 21.4% 33.3% 54.2% 33.3% 19.1% 16.7% 5.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 -0.5% -3.2% 8.7% 16.2% 52.2% 47.4% 13.0% 25.1% 26.1% 11.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 112 22.9% 4.8% 5.4% 12.3% 32.1% 43.2% 42.0% 29.9% 20.5% 14.6%
Male 61 17.8% 1.8% 6.6% 14.2% 36.1% 44.4% 37.7% 28.2% 19.7% 13.3%
Female 51 29.0% 8.2% 3.9% 10.3% 27.5% 41.9% 47.1% 31.8% 21.6% 16.1%
Hispanic 16 16.7% -12.2% 12.5% 19.5% 31.3% 53.1% 50.0% 21.7% 6.3% 5.7%
White 88 26.3% 19.4% 4.5% 6.3% 29.5% 34.7% 43.2% 36.7% 22.7% 22.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 12 -22.9% -21.0% 25.0% 34.8% 58.3% 46.6% 16.7% 13.9% 0.0% 4.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 22.5% -10.0% 13.8% 18.7% 24.1% 51.8% 48.3% 23.1% 13.8% 6.5%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 105 35.4% 17.2% 5.7% 10.7% 31.4% 44.6% 39.0% 28.0% 23.8% 16.8%
Male 56 31.4% 13.6% 7.1% 12.6% 33.9% 46.2% 35.7% 26.5% 23.2% 14.7%
Female 46 37.7% 20.9% 4.3% 8.6% 30.4% 43.0% 39.1% 29.5% 26.1% 18.9%
Hispanic 12 39.2% -1.2% 0.0% 18.0% 33.3% 55.7% 50.0% 19.9% 16.7% 6.4%
White 83 33.9% 31.7% 7.2% 5.4% 31.3% 35.4% 38.6% 33.7% 22.9% 25.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 12 -10.8% -8.8% 33.3% 30.3% 50.0% 51.1% 16.7% 13.3% 0.0% 5.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 39.2% 1.3% 0.0% 16.1% 33.3% 55.1% 33.3% 21.2% 33.3% 7.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 4 Students Tested: 108
Nancy Gomes Elementary School:
100.0%Nevada:
99.9%
Studets Results in 2010/2011 Developing This School:
7.4%State:
15.9%
Exceeds Standard This School:
20.4%Nevada:
18.5%
Nancy Gomes Elementary School Results
Percent of Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 108 6.3% -1.1% 7.4% 15.9% 20.4% 19.3% 51.9% 46.3% 20.4% 18.5%
Male 60 4.1% -5.4% 6.7% 19.0% 23.3% 20.5% 55.0% 44.7% 15.0% 15.9%
Female 48 9.1% 3.4% 8.3% 12.7% 16.7% 18.0% 47.9% 48.0% 27.1% 21.3%
Hispanic 18 0.8% -10.8% 16.7% 21.5% 16.7% 23.4% 66.7% 43.4% 0.0% 11.7%
White 82 9.7% 10.9% 6.1% 9.1% 18.3% 14.1% 50.0% 50.0% 25.6% 26.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 15 -45.9% -38.7% 26.7% 53.1% 53.3% 19.7% 13.3% 21.6% 6.7% 5.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -11.3% -16.6% 27.3% 25.4% 18.2% 25.3% 54.6% 40.0% 0.0% 9.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 39 -9.5% -11.4% 10.3% 21.7% 33.3% 23.8% 46.2% 43.1% 10.3% 11.4%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 122 3.8% -0.8% 2.5% 7.4% 27.9% 27.5% 44.3% 41.6% 25.4% 23.5%
Male 61 3.0% -4.2% 3.3% 9.3% 27.9% 29.1% 44.3% 41.0% 24.6% 20.6%
Female 61 4.6% 2.8% 1.6% 5.4% 27.9% 25.8% 44.3% 42.1% 26.2% 26.6%
Hispanic 25 2.1% -11.7% 0.0% 10.1% 32.0% 35.6% 40.0% 39.4% 28.0% 14.9%
White 91 3.3% 11.4% 2.2% 4.2% 28.6% 18.5% 45.1% 43.9% 24.2% 33.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 25 -17.9% -39.2% 12.0% 33.6% 40.0% 39.7% 48.0% 20.3% 0.0% 6.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 15 -19.2% -27.9% 0.0% 14.5% 53.3% 47.4% 33.3% 33.1% 13.3% 5.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 40 1.6% -11.7% 2.5% 10.7% 30.0% 35.1% 47.5% 39.6% 20.0% 14.6%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 9.6% 5.8% 4.1% 9.1% 30.1% 28.9% 50.4% 46.2% 15.4% 15.8%
Male 50 7.7% 1.8% 2.0% 11.1% 34.0% 30.7% 58.0% 44.6% 6.0% 13.6%
Female 73 10.8% 9.9% 5.5% 6.9% 27.4% 26.9% 45.2% 48.0% 21.9% 18.2%
Hispanic 21 -3.9% -6.3% 9.5% 12.6% 38.1% 37.3% 52.4% 41.4% 0.0% 8.7%
White 89 10.0% 18.8% 3.4% 5.4% 30.3% 19.4% 48.3% 52.0% 18.0% 23.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 25 -28.3% -30.5% 20.0% 37.2% 52.0% 37.0% 28.0% 21.0% 0.0% 4.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 12 -31.3% -22.7% 16.7% 18.2% 58.3% 48.2% 25.0% 31.2% 0.0% 2.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 55 -3.6% -6.1% 9.1% 13.0% 38.2% 36.8% 43.6% 41.3% 9.1% 8.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 128 6.7% 0.8% 6.3% 11.7% 30.7% 31.2% 55.1% 41.7% 7.9% 15.4%
Male 67 10.4% -3.8% 9.1% 14.4% 24.2% 33.1% 56.1% 39.0% 10.6% 13.5%
Female 61 2.7% 5.7% 3.3% 8.8% 37.7% 29.2% 54.1% 44.6% 4.9% 17.4%
Hispanic 29 9.2% -10.9% 3.4% 15.7% 31.0% 38.9% 62.1% 37.4% 3.4% 8.0%
White 86 5.3% 13.0% 7.0% 7.1% 31.4% 23.5% 52.3% 46.6% 9.3% 22.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 -32.8% -32.9% 23.5% 40.8% 52.9% 35.8% 17.6% 18.3% 5.9% 5.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 -0.1% -26.3% 6.3% 22.6% 37.5% 47.5% 56.3% 27.2% 0.0% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 34 -16.9% -11.8% 12.1% 17.1% 48.5% 38.4% 33.3% 36.7% 6.1% 7.8%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 124 22.0% 14.5% 6.5% 13.0% 28.2% 29.2% 47.6% 41.5% 17.7% 16.3%
Male 58 15.3% 9.4% 8.6% 16.1% 32.8% 31.1% 46.6% 38.3% 12.1% 14.5%
Female 66 27.9% 19.9% 4.5% 9.7% 24.2% 27.1% 48.5% 44.9% 22.7% 18.2%
Hispanic 25 28.7% 0.9% 8.0% 18.6% 20.0% 37.2% 60.0% 36.6% 12.0% 7.6%
White 94 22.7% 28.0% 6.4% 7.4% 27.7% 21.2% 45.7% 46.4% 20.2% 24.9%
Individual Education Plan Students 22 -29.7% -18.7% 27.3% 41.4% 59.1% 34.0% 13.6% 19.3% 0.0% 5.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 11 -16.0% -18.4% 18.2% 27.7% 54.5% 47.4% 27.3% 23.6% 0.0% 1.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 29 11.9% 0.6% 10.3% 19.2% 34.5% 36.9% 44.8% 36.2% 10.3% 7.7%
Select school year: 2010/2011 2009/2010 2008/2009 2007/2008 2006/2007
Criterion Referenced Test Reading Grade 5 Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 131 -3.4% -6.1% 13.0% 15.1% 45.0% 45.6% 39.7% 35.1% 2.3% 4.2%
Male 69 -7.7% -10.0% 18.8% 18.1% 43.5% 46.6% 34.8% 32.2% 2.9% 3.2%
Female 62 1.4% -2.2% 6.5% 12.1% 46.8% 44.7% 45.2% 38.1% 1.6% 5.1%
Hispanic 19 -8.6% -19.6% 15.8% 21.6% 47.4% 52.7% 36.8% 24.3% 0.0% 1.4%
White 96 -2.7% 7.4% 14.6% 8.5% 42.7% 38.6% 39.6% 46.1% 3.1% 6.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 -39.1% -34.8% 50.0% 47.5% 43.8% 41.9% 6.3% 10.0% 0.0% 0.6%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 23 -6.3% -20.8% 17.4% 22.8% 43.5% 52.6% 34.8% 23.3% 4.3% 1.3%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 5.0% -2.9% 8.1% 14.1% 41.5% 43.4% 48.0% 36.9% 2.4% 5.6%
Male 57 0.2% -5.6% 10.5% 16.7% 43.9% 43.5% 43.9% 34.9% 1.8% 4.9%
Female 66 9.1% 0.2% 6.1% 11.1% 39.4% 43.3% 51.5% 39.2% 3.0% 6.4%
Hispanic 23 -19.3% -19.7% 21.7% 22.3% 52.2% 51.9% 26.1% 23.9% 0.0% 1.8%
White 89 9.7% 12.3% 5.6% 6.9% 39.3% 35.4% 51.7% 48.6% 3.4% 9.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 16 -39.1% -31.8% 43.8% 43.9% 50.0% 42.4% 0.0% 12.6% 6.3% 1.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 27 -12.1% -18.8% 11.1% 21.8% 55.6% 51.6% 33.3% 24.6% 0.0% 2.0%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 101 20.0% 9.0% 7.1% 12.5% 38.4% 43.9% 45.5% 37.3% 9.1% 6.3%
Male 44 22.6% 5.8% 9.5% 14.8% 33.3% 44.9% 50.0% 35.4% 7.1% 4.9%
Female 56 19.1% 12.5% 5.4% 10.0% 41.1% 43.0% 42.9% 39.3% 10.7% 7.7%
White 84 18.5% 23.8% 8.4% 6.5% 38.6% 35.2% 43.4% 48.2% 9.6% 10.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 17.5% -6.8% 12.0% 19.1% 36.0% 53.1% 48.0% 25.4% 4.0% 2.3%
Select school year: 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Language Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 127 11.3% 23.0% 25.8% 25.4% 37.9% 25.9% 25.0% 25.7%
Male 66 12.3% 27.8% 26.2% 26.6% 36.9% 24.3% 24.6% 21.3%
Female 61 10.2% 18.0% 25.4% 24.2% 39.0% 27.5% 25.4% 30.3%
White 86 11.9% 14.6% 23.8% 21.5% 35.7% 27.9% 28.6% 36.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 27.8% 53.8% 27.8% 23.9% 27.8% 13.1% 16.7% 9.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 6.3% 42.6% 37.5% 33.4% 43.8% 18.1% 12.5% 5.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 17.2% 33.1% 37.9% 29.8% 37.9% 23.3% 6.9% 13.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 16.5% 22.9% 33.1% 24.2% 20.7% 25.4% 29.8% 27.5%
Male 58 26.8% 27.7% 26.8% 25.4% 16.1% 24.0% 30.4% 22.9%
Female 65 7.7% 17.9% 38.5% 23.1% 24.6% 26.8% 29.2% 32.2%
White 94 18.5% 14.0% 33.7% 19.8% 20.7% 27.6% 27.2% 38.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 22 40.9% 52.9% 45.5% 23.7% 4.5% 14.2% 9.1% 9.1%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 30.0% 46.7% 40.0% 32.4% 30.0% 16.5% 0.0% 4.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 12.5% 33.6% 50.0% 29.3% 16.7% 22.6% 20.8% 14.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 11.2% 23.5% 37.9% 24.8% 25.0% 25.1% 25.9% 26.5%
Male 64 14.3% 28.3% 38.1% 25.6% 23.8% 23.9% 23.8% 22.3%
Female 54 7.5% 18.5% 37.7% 24.1% 26.4% 26.4% 28.3% 30.9%
Hispanic 13 25.0% 34.6% 33.3% 29.7% 25.0% 22.1% 16.7% 13.6%
White 91 8.9% 14.3% 37.8% 21.0% 24.4% 27.9% 28.9% 36.8%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 35.7% 52.4% 42.9% 25.4% 14.3% 13.4% 7.1% 8.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 26.7% 35.0% 40.0% 29.2% 23.3% 21.7% 10.0% 14.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 18.8% 23.5% 24.8% 25.1% 32.5% 24.9% 23.9% 26.6%
Male 63 25.4% 27.9% 30.2% 26.1% 30.2% 23.5% 14.3% 22.5%
Female 55 11.1% 18.9% 18.5% 24.0% 35.2% 26.2% 35.2% 30.9%
Hispanic 11 27.3% 34.9% 18.2% 29.8% 36.4% 21.6% 18.2% 13.7%
White 94 17.2% 14.5% 24.7% 21.7% 34.4% 27.3% 23.7% 36.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 57.1% 53.7% 35.7% 24.7% 7.1% 13.6% 0.0% 8.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 24.0% 35.3% 28.0% 30.0% 24.0% 21.1% 24.0% 13.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 110 19.1% 26.8% 21.8% 23.8% 28.2% 24.0% 30.9% 25.4%
Male 52 23.1% 31.1% 30.8% 24.4% 26.9% 22.9% 19.2% 21.6%
Female 58 15.5% 22.2% 13.8% 23.1% 29.3% 25.2% 41.4% 29.5%
Hispanic 12 33.3% 39.4% 33.3% 28.6% 25.0% 20.2% 8.3% 11.9%
White 90 18.9% 17.5% 18.9% 20.6% 30.0% 26.3% 32.2% 35.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 52.6% 57.0% 31.6% 23.0% 10.5% 12.1% 5.3% 7.9%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 23.8% 38.2% 33.3% 28.3% 33.3% 21.0% 9.5% 12.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Mathematics Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 127 17.7% 20.6% 25.8% 24.2% 32.3% 27.9% 24.2% 27.3%
Male 66 16.9% 21.9% 18.5% 23.0% 35.4% 26.4% 29.2% 28.7%
Female 61 18.6% 19.2% 33.9% 25.4% 28.8% 29.6% 18.6% 25.8%
White 86 17.9% 13.1% 25.0% 20.4% 29.8% 29.1% 27.4% 37.4%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 38.9% 46.5% 27.8% 25.1% 16.7% 15.8% 16.7% 12.6%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 12.5% 34.0% 25.0% 31.8% 50.0% 24.0% 12.5% 10.3%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 20.7% 28.9% 31.0% 27.9% 27.6% 26.7% 20.7% 16.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 11.6% 20.8% 29.8% 24.4% 31.4% 27.4% 27.3% 27.3%
Male 58 8.9% 21.6% 30.4% 23.6% 30.4% 26.1% 30.4% 28.7%
Female 65 13.8% 20.0% 29.2% 25.3% 32.3% 28.7% 24.6% 26.0%
White 94 10.9% 12.7% 28.3% 20.2% 32.6% 28.8% 28.3% 38.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 22 22.7% 46.5% 40.9% 24.6% 18.2% 16.6% 18.2% 12.3%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 20.0% 38.2% 60.0% 32.6% 20.0% 21.5% 0.0% 7.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 25.0% 29.7% 20.8% 29.1% 37.5% 25.5% 16.7% 15.7%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 6.9% 21.4% 26.7% 24.6% 40.5% 26.9% 25.9% 27.0%
Male 64 7.9% 22.6% 20.6% 23.5% 42.9% 25.5% 28.6% 28.5%
Female 54 5.7% 20.3% 34.0% 25.7% 37.7% 28.5% 22.6% 25.6%
Hispanic 13 0.0% 30.1% 30.8% 28.9% 38.5% 25.5% 30.8% 15.5%
White 91 6.7% 13.0% 27.0% 20.8% 41.6% 28.9% 24.7% 37.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 21.4% 46.2% 35.7% 26.1% 35.7% 16.2% 7.1% 11.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 16.7% 31.5% 30.0% 29.1% 40.0% 24.2% 13.3% 15.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 16.2% 22.1% 21.4% 25.2% 40.2% 27.2% 22.2% 25.5%
Male 63 17.5% 23.3% 25.4% 24.0% 34.9% 26.1% 22.2% 26.6%
Female 55 14.8% 20.9% 16.7% 26.4% 46.3% 28.2% 22.2% 24.4%
Hispanic 11 0.0% 30.3% 18.2% 30.5% 54.5% 24.9% 27.3% 14.4%
White 94 18.3% 14.4% 19.4% 21.2% 39.8% 29.3% 22.6% 35.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 21.4% 48.9% 57.1% 24.5% 14.3% 16.4% 7.1% 10.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 12.0% 31.9% 32.0% 30.0% 24.0% 24.0% 32.0% 14.1%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 110 17.3% 25.0% 19.1% 23.9% 33.6% 26.7% 30.0% 24.5%
Male 52 23.1% 25.6% 17.3% 22.8% 32.7% 25.7% 26.9% 25.9%
Female 58 12.1% 24.4% 20.7% 24.9% 34.5% 27.7% 32.8% 23.0%
Hispanic 12 16.7% 34.2% 16.7% 28.1% 58.3% 24.8% 8.3% 12.9%
White 90 17.8% 16.8% 18.9% 20.8% 30.0% 28.5% 33.3% 34.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 57.9% 51.5% 21.1% 24.3% 10.5% 15.1% 10.5% 9.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 28.6% 34.8% 33.3% 28.0% 19.0% 23.9% 19.0% 13.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Reading Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 127 16.7% 23.7% 33.3% 27.6% 27.0% 25.3% 23.0% 23.5%
Male 66 20.0% 25.9% 20.0% 27.8% 32.3% 24.1% 27.7% 22.2%
Female 61 13.1% 21.4% 47.5% 27.3% 21.3% 26.5% 18.0% 24.8%
White 86 14.0% 11.6% 30.2% 21.5% 27.9% 29.4% 27.9% 37.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 38.9% 53.9% 33.3% 24.7% 16.7% 12.0% 11.1% 9.4%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 31.3% 51.7% 50.0% 34.9% 12.5% 11.1% 6.3% 2.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 23.3% 35.4% 50.0% 32.7% 20.0% 21.0% 6.7% 10.9%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 19.8% 24.8% 31.4% 27.0% 21.5% 24.8% 27.3% 23.4%
Male 58 23.2% 26.9% 28.6% 27.2% 28.6% 23.5% 19.6% 22.4%
Female 65 16.9% 22.6% 33.8% 26.9% 15.4% 26.1% 33.8% 24.4%
White 94 19.6% 11.5% 29.3% 21.6% 20.7% 29.7% 30.4% 37.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 22 50.0% 54.0% 40.9% 24.4% 0.0% 12.8% 9.1% 8.8%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 60.0% 58.9% 40.0% 31.7% 0.0% 8.0% 0.0% 1.4%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 20.8% 37.9% 45.8% 31.7% 25.0% 20.1% 8.3% 10.4%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 13.8% 25.9% 34.5% 26.5% 25.0% 23.9% 26.7% 23.7%
Male 64 14.3% 27.9% 33.3% 26.6% 27.0% 22.9% 25.4% 22.6%
Female 54 13.2% 23.9% 35.8% 26.5% 22.6% 24.8% 28.3% 24.8%
Hispanic 13 16.7% 42.7% 50.0% 30.3% 16.7% 17.9% 16.7% 9.1%
White 91 11.1% 11.9% 33.3% 22.3% 26.7% 28.5% 28.9% 37.3%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 42.9% 53.0% 50.0% 26.1% 0.0% 12.7% 7.1% 8.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 33.3% 40.0% 43.3% 30.7% 13.3% 18.6% 10.0% 10.6%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 20.0% 25.8% 21.7% 26.9% 32.2% 24.0% 26.1% 23.3%
Male 63 23.0% 27.3% 27.9% 27.3% 27.9% 23.2% 21.3% 22.1%
Female 55 16.7% 24.1% 14.8% 26.4% 37.0% 24.9% 31.5% 24.5%
Hispanic 11 9.1% 43.2% 36.4% 31.3% 45.5% 17.0% 9.1% 8.5%
White 94 19.8% 12.5% 20.9% 22.4% 30.8% 28.5% 28.6% 36.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 50.0% 53.6% 35.7% 25.9% 14.3% 12.5% 0.0% 8.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 20.0% 40.3% 28.0% 31.0% 32.0% 18.7% 20.0% 10.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 110 15.5% 27.4% 26.4% 27.0% 23.6% 21.2% 34.5% 24.4%
Male 52 19.2% 28.7% 25.0% 27.6% 26.9% 20.5% 28.8% 23.2%
Female 58 12.1% 26.0% 27.6% 26.4% 20.7% 21.9% 39.7% 25.6%
Hispanic 12 25.0% 46.3% 41.7% 30.3% 25.0% 15.0% 8.3% 8.4%
White 90 15.6% 13.9% 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 25.2% 37.8% 37.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 47.4% 54.6% 26.3% 27.4% 21.1% 10.3% 5.3% 7.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 33.3% 41.5% 23.8% 30.9% 28.6% 16.7% 14.3% 11.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Iowa Tests of Basic Skills Science Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 127 12.7% 19.9% 23.8% 26.8% 36.5% 31.5% 27.0% 21.8%
Male 66 15.4% 21.4% 12.3% 26.2% 41.5% 29.8% 30.8% 22.6%
Female 61 9.8% 18.2% 36.1% 27.6% 31.1% 33.3% 23.0% 20.9%
White 86 12.8% 11.8% 20.9% 19.6% 36.0% 34.4% 30.2% 34.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 18 22.2% 34.7% 33.3% 31.4% 38.9% 22.3% 5.6% 11.5%
Limited English Proficiency Students 16 12.5% 35.4% 43.8% 38.4% 31.3% 22.2% 12.5% 4.1%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 30 10.0% 28.0% 43.3% 33.0% 36.7% 28.2% 10.0% 10.8%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 123 10.0% 21.4% 23.3% 26.8% 37.5% 30.8% 29.2% 21.1%
Male 58 8.9% 22.7% 19.6% 26.0% 44.6% 29.2% 26.8% 22.1%
Female 65 10.9% 20.0% 26.6% 27.6% 31.3% 32.5% 31.3% 20.0%
White 94 6.6% 11.9% 25.3% 20.2% 39.6% 34.6% 28.6% 33.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 22 13.6% 35.7% 27.3% 30.8% 45.5% 22.3% 13.6% 11.2%
Limited English Proficiency Students 10 60.0% 41.0% 10.0% 37.9% 30.0% 18.4% 0.0% 2.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 12.5% 30.7% 33.3% 32.5% 33.3% 26.7% 20.8% 10.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 8.5% 22.4% 25.6% 26.3% 40.2% 30.7% 25.6% 20.6%
Male 64 7.8% 23.7% 21.9% 25.6% 42.2% 29.4% 28.1% 21.3%
Female 54 9.4% 21.1% 30.2% 27.1% 37.7% 31.9% 22.6% 19.9%
Hispanic 13 7.7% 33.0% 46.2% 32.3% 38.5% 25.6% 7.7% 9.1%
White 91 8.9% 12.6% 23.3% 20.4% 40.0% 34.8% 27.8% 32.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 7.1% 36.7% 42.9% 31.5% 35.7% 22.0% 14.3% 9.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 31 6.7% 32.4% 43.3% 32.2% 43.3% 25.9% 6.7% 9.5%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 118 13.7% 22.7% 23.9% 27.3% 41.0% 30.2% 21.4% 19.8%
Male 63 15.9% 23.8% 27.0% 27.0% 42.9% 28.9% 14.3% 20.2%
Female 55 11.1% 21.5% 20.4% 27.6% 38.9% 31.5% 29.6% 19.4%
Hispanic 11 18.2% 33.2% 9.1% 33.5% 72.7% 25.2% 0.0% 8.0%
White 94 11.8% 13.2% 25.8% 21.5% 39.8% 34.7% 22.6% 30.5%
Individual Education Plan Students 14 28.6% 37.1% 14.3% 33.3% 57.1% 19.9% 0.0% 9.7%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 12.0% 32.7% 24.0% 33.4% 48.0% 25.0% 16.0% 9.0%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 110 18.2% 22.4% 11.8% 24.1% 39.1% 33.2% 30.9% 20.4%
Male 52 19.2% 23.9% 17.3% 23.5% 40.4% 31.7% 23.1% 21.0%
Female 58 17.2% 20.8% 6.9% 24.7% 37.9% 34.7% 37.9% 19.8%
Hispanic 12 33.3% 32.3% 25.0% 30.9% 33.3% 28.4% 8.3% 8.4%
White 90 17.8% 14.1% 10.0% 17.9% 37.8% 36.8% 34.4% 31.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 36.8% 38.7% 5.3% 28.7% 47.4% 24.2% 10.5% 8.5%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 28.6% 31.4% 14.3% 30.3% 33.3% 29.0% 23.8% 9.2%
Select school year: 2007/2008 2006/2007 2005/2006 2004/2005 2003/2004
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 4 Detailed Students Results Percent of Nancy Gomes Elementary School Students That Met or Exceeded Standard
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 117 13.0% 1.9% 2.6% 13.8% 44.8% 44.7% 44.0% 34.4% 8.6% 7.1%
Male 63 1.7% -5.7% 3.2% 18.1% 55.6% 48.0% 38.1% 29.5% 3.2% 4.4%
Female 54 26.4% 9.7% 1.9% 9.4% 32.1% 41.3% 50.9% 39.5% 15.1% 9.7%
Hispanic 12 27.1% -10.6% 0.0% 20.9% 33.3% 50.1% 41.7% 25.8% 25.0% 3.2%
White 94 9.9% 11.0% 3.2% 8.6% 47.3% 40.8% 43.0% 40.7% 6.5% 10.0%
Individual Education Plan Students 12 -31.3% -25.5% 8.3% 40.5% 83.3% 45.4% 8.3% 12.3% 0.0% 1.8%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 26 24.4% -10.0% 0.0% 20.0% 36.0% 50.3% 52.0% 26.3% 12.0% 3.3%
Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 114 24.3% 12.1% 12.3% 16.2% 36.0% 44.1% 44.7% 32.9% 7.0% 6.7%
Male 53 6.5% 4.2% 17.0% 21.3% 49.1% 47.1% 30.2% 27.4% 3.8% 4.3%
Female 61 39.7% 20.6% 8.2% 10.9% 24.6% 41.0% 57.4% 38.8% 9.8% 9.3%
Hispanic 13 -4.4% 0.3% 23.1% 23.9% 53.8% 48.3% 7.7% 24.8% 15.4% 3.0%
White 91 27.4% 20.5% 12.1% 10.5% 33.0% 41.4% 49.5% 38.8% 5.5% 9.2%
Individual Education Plan Students 19 -22.2% -14.6% 57.9% 46.5% 36.8% 40.5% 5.3% 11.7% 0.0% 1.2%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 32 6.9% 0.4% 21.9% 23.1% 43.8% 49.0% 34.4% 24.9% 0.0% 3.1%
Select school year: 2004/2005 2003/2004
Nevada Writing Examination Grade 5 Detailed Students Results Students Tested Students Above Annual Measurable Objective Students Results Developing Approaches Standard Meets Standard Exceeds Standard
Here State Here State Here State Here State Here State
All Students 129 3.8% 5.3% 7.8% 11.1% 48.8% 44.0% 38.8% 38.4% 4.7% 6.5%
Male 67 -3.8% -2.4% 11.9% 14.8% 52.2% 48.0% 31.3% 33.1% 4.5% 4.1%
Female 62 12.0% 13.2% 3.2% 7.3% 45.2% 40.0% 46.8% 43.9% 4.8% 8.9%
Hispanic 18 -11.8% -6.4% 11.1% 16.0% 61.1% 50.8% 22.2% 30.2% 5.6% 3.0%
White 95 4.6% 14.8% 6.3% 7.1% 49.5% 38.5% 38.9% 45.3% 5.3% 9.1%
Individual Education Plan Students 15 -32.9% -25.8% 53.3% 40.0% 40.0% 46.3% 6.7% 12.8% 0.0% 1.0%
Free or Reduced Price Lunch Students 21 3.3% -7.2% 9.5% 16.4% 47.6% 51.2% 42.9% 29.8% 0.0% 2.6%
All Cities
Nevada Forum
Nevada
Cold Springs, NV
Nancy Gomes Elementary School in Cold Springs, Nevada (NV)
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: