Nathan B. Young Elementary School in Opa-locka, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 9.

14120 NW 24TH AVE
Opa-locka, FL 33054

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Imagine Charter At Weston School (19.8 miles):

98
Silver Palms Elementary School (10.5 miles):

80
Blue Lakes Elementary School (14.4 miles):

67
Broward Estates Elementary School (15.6 miles):

55
North Glade Elementary School (3.4 miles):

45
Eneida M. Hartner Elementary School (7.2 miles):

36
Skyway Elementary School (3.9 miles):

23
Nathan B. Young Elementary School:

9
Nathan B. Young Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County County:

32
Opa-locka:

32
Nathan B. Young Elementary School:

9

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 685-7204 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 5971
School type: Elementary
District Name: DADE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 688-6465
Principal: Raymond J Sands
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 3 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 103
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://nbyoung.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

46%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

69%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

24%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

54%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

420
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: D

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

97%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 126
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 126
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 135 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 135 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

62%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

66%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

33%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

492
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 153 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 153 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 142
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 144 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 144 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 135
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 148 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 148 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 137
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

54%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

85%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

28%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

50%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

449
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 164 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 164 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 150 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 150 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 142
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 138
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 146
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 140
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

44%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

2%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

62%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

69%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

403
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 216 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 217 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 204
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 203 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 193
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 206 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 206 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 194
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

36%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

45%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

26%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

37%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

46%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

232
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: F

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 234 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 70
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 217
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 218
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 224 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 226 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 69

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 211
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 212
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 221 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 223 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 68

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 207
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 208
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 44
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 45
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

61%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

77%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

83%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

440
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

96%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

100%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1135
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

40%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

42%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1423
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

31%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

27%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1444
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

23%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1383
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1477
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

35%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

47%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1543
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

306
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

48%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

25%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1184
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1387
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 09%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 08
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1488
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

281
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1306
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1412
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1641
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

327
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 42
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 36%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1044
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1398
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1405
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

275
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1273
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

294
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1394
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1578
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

68
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

596
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

29
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

46
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

628
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

48
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

50
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

48
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 45
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

271
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 33%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 33%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 53%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1116
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1278
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1287
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1228
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 59

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1353
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1353
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1274
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 79

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

237
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1275
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1333
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1352
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1281
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 71

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1500
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 97%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1497
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1222
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 274

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87
Mean Scale Score
Here:

600
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale Score
Here:

610
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 32
Literary (max 18): 8
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 60
Mean Scale Score
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

627
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 35
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 87
Mean Scale Score
Here:

590
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 33
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 69
Mean Scale Score
Here:

615
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 46
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 60
Mean Scale Score
NATHAN B. YOUNG ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

624
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 38
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 66
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

260
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 39%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 71%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2020 Advameg, Inc.