U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

New Middle Cc School in Tallahassee, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Tallahassee, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 15.

3420 W THARPE ST
Tallahassee, FL 32303

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Florida State University School (9.9 miles):

72
Crossroad Academy School (13.7 miles):

65
Pace Secondary School (7.1 miles):

48
Belle Vue Middle School (2.8 miles):

42
Pace Secondary School (7.1 miles):

38
C.K. Steele-Leroy Collins Charter Middle School (4.6 miles):

25
New Middle Cc School:

15
Florida A&m University Developmental Research School (4.9 miles):

15
New Middle Cc School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Leon County:

45
Tallahassee:

45
New Middle Cc School:

15

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Tallahassee, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations


Phone: (850) 487-7100 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 37
School number: 1201
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: LEON
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

84%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

86%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

90%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

69%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

604
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

24%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 1

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1048 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1048 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 306
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1003
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 954

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1002
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 954
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 793 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 793 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 232
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 767
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 728

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 767
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 729
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 50
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 133
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 129
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 42 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 163 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 163 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 153
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 142 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 142 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 130
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

89%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

51%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

590
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

21%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 1


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 640 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 640 (99%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 625
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 591

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 625
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 591
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 504 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 504 (99%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 496
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 471

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 496
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 471
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 73
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 75
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 94 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (98%)
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 86
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 89
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 85
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

56%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

58%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

18%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

52%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

464
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: C

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

81%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 413 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 413 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 126
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 322

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 362
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 320
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 238

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 261
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 236
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 354 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 354 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 277

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 308
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 275
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 272 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 272 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 236
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 218

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 236
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 217
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 107 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1190
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

14
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1463
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

55%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

1478
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

27%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

12%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

49%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

2
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

1
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1863
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1971
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

348
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1967
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

8%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

40%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2046
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

38%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

339
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

46%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

64%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1305
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

19%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

42%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

59%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1455
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

13%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

54%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1594
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

29%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

4%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1822
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

26%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1912
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

5%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

31%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

14%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1964
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

13%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

24%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2034
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

334
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

43%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

13%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1141
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1470
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1505
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1888
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

1923
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

290
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1276
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1463
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1590
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1834
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1889
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

331
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1906
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 120
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 43
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1226
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

288
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1374
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1518
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1710
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1304
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1462
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

301
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1610
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

321
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1689
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1795
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

117
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

613
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

44
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

119
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

636
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

55
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

113
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

657
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

64
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

115
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

672
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

65
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

53
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

680
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

66
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 121
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

292
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 51%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
NEW MIDDLE SCHOOL CC:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 84%

Back to: Tallahassee, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.