
Back to: Pinellas Park, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 60.
6000 70TH AVE N
Pinellas Park, FL 33781
Other nearby schools ratings:
Nina Harris Ese Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Pinellas County:  51  Pinellas Park:  40  Nina Harris Ese Center School:  60 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Phone: (727) 5477850 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2581
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 5477800
Principal: Mary S Sakoff
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 53
Senate District: 16
School Web Address: http://www.ninaharris.pinellas.k12.fl.us
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  87%  State average from 59 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  87%  State average from 59 schools:  78% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  89%  State average from 59 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  76%  State average from 59 schools:  54% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  71%  State average from 59 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  52%  State average from 59 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  63%  State average from 59 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  47%  State average from 59 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  572  State average from 59 schools:  560 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 59 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: NO
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  25%  State average from 59 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  31%  State average from 59 schools:  46% 
Region: 5
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  8%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  12%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  13%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 90
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  15%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  8%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  9%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 52
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 99 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  8%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 38
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  12%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 91
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  13%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 90
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  89%  State average from 58 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  90%  State average from 58 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  90%  State average from 58 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  64%  State average from 58 schools:  50% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  78%  State average from 58 schools:  69% 
Making Math GainsHere:  67%  State average from 58 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  69%  State average from 58 schools:  66% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  79%  State average from 58 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  626  State average from 58 schools:  564 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 59 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  18%  State average from 59 schools:  51% 
Minority RateHere:  27%  State average from 59 schools:  46% 
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  8%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  11%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  11%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 93
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  16%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  11%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 22
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  8%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  8%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 48
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  8%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  11%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 94
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  11%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 93
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  88%  State average from 59 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  90%  State average from 59 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  82%  State average from 59 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  70%  State average from 59 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  64%  State average from 59 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  60%  State average from 59 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  58%  State average from 59 schools:  60% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  64%  State average from 59 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  576  State average from 59 schools:  541 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 59 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  15%  State average from 59 schools:  47% 
Minority RateNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  26%  State average from 59 schools:  46% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 80 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  58%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 138 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 56
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 132
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  74%  State average from 25 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  71%  State average from 25 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  80%  State average from 25 schools:  81% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  40%  State average from 25 schools:  42% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  65%  State average from 25 schools:  59% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math GainsHere:  71%  State average from 25 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  63%  State average from 25 schools:  57% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  73%  State average from 25 schools:  66% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  537  State average from 25 schools:  493 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 25 schools:  97% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  75%  State average from 25 schools:  55% 
Minority RateHere:  93%  State average from 25 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 589 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 588 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 559
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 557
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 403 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 403 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 138
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 383
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 121 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 36
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  70%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 439 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 437 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 415
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 412
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  74%  State average from 23 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  67%  State average from 23 schools:  61% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  90%  State average from 23 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  66%  State average from 23 schools:  59% 
Making Math GainsHere:  72%  State average from 23 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  61%  State average from 23 schools:  59% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  430  State average from 23 schools:  391 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 23 schools:  97% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  72%  State average from 24 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  94%  State average from 24 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 627 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 628 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 172
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 599
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  64%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 601
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 43
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 428 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 428 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 116
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 407
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 407
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 127 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 128 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 37
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 125
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 127
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 448 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 447 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 122
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 425
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 425
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 78 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 75
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 75
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 56 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 56 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 53
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 53
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  71%  State average from 24 schools:  55% 
Meeting High Standards in MathNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  62%  State average from 24 schools:  56% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  85%  State average from 24 schools:  79% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  67%  State average from 24 schools:  56% 
Making Math GainsHere:  69%  State average from 24 schools:  63% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  63%  State average from 24 schools:  54% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  417  State average from 24 schools:  363 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 24 schools:  95% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: B
Grade in 2002: B
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: C
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  72%  State average from 24 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  93%  State average from 24 schools:  41% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1497  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  333  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  45%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1682  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  337  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  40%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  13%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  80%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1790  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  32%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  39%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  87%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  342  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  52%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  74%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1608  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  367  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  3%  State average:  8% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  36%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  26%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  91%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  5  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1648  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  344  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  36%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  15%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  82%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1741  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  348  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  35%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  76%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  8  State average:  7 
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1534  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1718  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1766  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  338  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1671  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  380  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 39%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  1683  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  352  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1749  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  350  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 197
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1537  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  339  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1660  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  333  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1719  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1642  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  374  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1659  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  346  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1742  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  349  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  197  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  653  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  16  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreNINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  661  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Functional (max 18)NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  8  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  179  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  679  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  14  State average:  13 
Functional (max 18)NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  15  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  10  State average:  9 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 194
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  318  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 68%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 77%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1385  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  314  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1552  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1565  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1410  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 155
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1611  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1626  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1538  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 88
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  298  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1424  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1520  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1520  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1362  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 158
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1644  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 83%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007NINA HARRIS ESE CENTER:  1671  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1526  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 145
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 196
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  639  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 208
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  640  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 59
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 193
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  665  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 196
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  634  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 208
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  647  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 193
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  659  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 70
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 207
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  294  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 44%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 63%
