
Back to: Fellsmere, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 86.
11 N WILLOW ST
Fellsmere, FL 32948
Other nearby schools ratings:
North County Charter School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Indian River County:  48  Fellsmere:  56  North County Charter School:  86 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Fellsmere, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (772) 5710153 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 31
School number: 5003
School type: Elementary
District Name: INDIAN RIVER
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (772) 5718489
Principal: Dorie Miller
Regular charter school.
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 15
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 29
Senate District: 26
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  78%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  83%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  53%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  71%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  83%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  71%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  83%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  615  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  51%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  43%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 3
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 58
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 35
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  73%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  84%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  55%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  85%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  81%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  85%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  81%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  644  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  46%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  42%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 43
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 43
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 23
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 26
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  82%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  93%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  54%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  63%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  87%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  63%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  87%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  615  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  58%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  57%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  81%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  86%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  87%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  50%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  78%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  73%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  78%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  73%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  606  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  60%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  46%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  100%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 11
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 44
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 44
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 18
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  83%  State average from 631 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  85%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  81%  State average from 631 schools:  80% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  81%  State average from 631 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  76%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  81%  State average from 631 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  487  State average from 631 schools:  417 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 631 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  12%  State average from 631 schools:  54% 
Minority RateNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  42%  State average from 631 schools:  52% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1353  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  309  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  61%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  22%  State average:  32% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  83%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1697  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  48%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  17%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  22%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  87%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1712  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  321  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  32%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  11%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  42%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  63%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  11  State average:  10 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1613  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  294  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  28%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  17%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  53%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1688  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  294  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  25%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  27%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  12%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  48%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  37%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  16%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  5%  State average:  4% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  53%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1451  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  333  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  22%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  39%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  78%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1731  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  363  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  30%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  22%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  96%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  5  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1829  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  367  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  26%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  42%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  74%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1668  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  29%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  22%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  49%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  1770  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  20%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  27%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  16%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  53%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1409  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1675  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 06%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  1711  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  321  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1641  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1748  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1511  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  346  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1718  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  360  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1698  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1685  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1819  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  5  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 100%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 6
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1497  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 81%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1583  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1725  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1620  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  295  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1604  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  366  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1604  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1805  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  362  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1635  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  644  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Median NPRNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  71  State average:  61 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  16  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  656  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  10  State average:  10 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  19  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  681  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Functional (max 18)NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  15  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  266  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  661  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Informational (max 18)NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  12  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  1  State average:  192 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  285  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 47%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 47%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 67%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 1
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 4
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  1474  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1679  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1679  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1582  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 97
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1676  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1687  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1570  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 117
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreNORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  1440  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1651  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  345  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1651  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1603  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 48
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000NORTH COUNTY CHARTER SCHOOL:  1761  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  353  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 58%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 8
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1790  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1556  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 235
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  645  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  662  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  680  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 82
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  650  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 81
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  680  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 89
Number Sense (max 12): 11
Operations (max 12): 10
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 12
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  679  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 85
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 20
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  313  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 65%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 14
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 10%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 85%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 60%
