U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

North Miami Senior High School in North Miami, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: North Miami, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 2.

800 NE 137TH ST
North Miami, FL 33161

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mast Academy School (11.2 miles):

94
International Studies Charter High School (10.0 miles):

67
South Pines Academy School (7.9 miles):

48
Sunset Heights Charter (Inactive 10/02) School (13.5 miles):

33
North Miami Beach Senior High School (2.3 miles):

18
Westland Hialeah Senior High School (8.0 miles):

7
North Miami Senior High School:

2
Life Skills Broward County School (18.3 miles):

2
North Miami Senior High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
North Miami:

27
North Miami Senior High School:

2

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA





Phone: (305) 891-6590 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7591
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 895-1788
Magnet School.
Principal: Michael A Lewis
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 104
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://nmhs2.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

21%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

55%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

79%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

20%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

38%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

41%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

395
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1317 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1305 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 603
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1174
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1132
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1112 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1102 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 489
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1002
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 968

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 994
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 959
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 941 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 934 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 409
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 855
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 827

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 850
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 821
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 266 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 129
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

24%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

56%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

21%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

54%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

421
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1258 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1252 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 675
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1085

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1078
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1026 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1020 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 560
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 930
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 888

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 923
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 882
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 674 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 670 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 363
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 611
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 587

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 609
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 586
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 160
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

20%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

74%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

22%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

39%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

47%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

375
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

52%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1425 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1411 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 733
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1341
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1202

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1318
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1172
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1172 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1160 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 607
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 977

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1079
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 949
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 192
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 780 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 768 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 365
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 741
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 729
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 651
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 342 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

Grade in 2007: I

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

98%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

20%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

71%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

44%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

301
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

52%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1501 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1489 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 763
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1413
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1395
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1210 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1200 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 627

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1144
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1130
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 111

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 226
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 222
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 825 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 817 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 385

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 769
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 761
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 287 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 284 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 144
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 267
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 266
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 169 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 71
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 163
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 160
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

18%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

42%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

57%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

311
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

47%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

43%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

20%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1778
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

30%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

63%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

7%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

46%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1866
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

285
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

26%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

11%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

2%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

45%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1949
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

72%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

20%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

25%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

20%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

55%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1808
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

291
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1775
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

277
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1898
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

294
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1931
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 705
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1714
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

274
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1817
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1901
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

671
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

669
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

749
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

683
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

41
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 760
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

257
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1703
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1729
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1680
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 48

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1729
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1755
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1729
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 27

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1795
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1819
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

1767
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 52

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1884
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1892
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1838
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 53

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 653
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 755
Mean Scale Score
Here:

684
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 648
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 752
Mean Scale Score
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

698
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 46
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 768
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:

257
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 24%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 68%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

Back to: North Miami, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.