North Miami Senior High School in North Miami, Florida (FL)

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories

Find:
Near:

Back to: North Miami, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.

City-data.com school rating (weighted overall 2010 test average compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.
800 NE 137TH ST
North Miami, FL 33161

North Miami Senior High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	48
Miami-Dade County:	50
North Miami, FL:	32
North Miami Senior High School:	1

Other nearby schools ratings:

Cypress Bay High School (17.6 miles):	86
Miami Palmetto Senior High School (18.5 miles):	71
South Pines Academy School (7.9 miles):	51
Miami Coral Park Senior High School (14.0 miles):	39
Miami Senior High School (9.6 miles):	24
Merrick Educational Center School (10.9 miles):	12
Miami Central Senior High School (3.9 miles):	6
North Miami Senior High School:	1

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

Recent posts about schools in North Miami, Florida on our local forum with over 1,500,000 registered users:

	Best College Prep Schools and Places to Live Please??? (2 replies)
	3 Miami Dade High schools ranked in the Top 100 nationwide (25 replies)
	Are Miami Shores/Biscayne Park Schools Good? (0 replies)
	Aventura or Boca??? Which is better for schools/lifestyle for ex-New Yorkers? (15 replies)
	20 year old college student NYC to MIA (7 replies)
	Review of 8 private schools in Miami/Ft Lauderdale (3 replies)

Phone: (305) 891-6590 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 7591
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 895-1788
Magnet School.
Principal: Michael A Lewis
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 1 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 104
Senate District: 33
School Web Address: http://nmhs2.dadeschools.net/

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	21%
State average from 451 schools:	62%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	55%
State average from 451 schools:	77%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	79%
State average from 452 schools:	86%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	20%
State average from 451 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	38%
State average from 452 schools:	58%

Making Math Gains

Here:	70%
State average from 449 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	41%
State average from 452 schools:	52%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	71%
State average from 452 schools:	67%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	395
State average from 452 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 450 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	71%
State average from 454 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	99%
State average from 454 schools:	47%

Region: 5

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1317 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1305 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 603
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1184
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1143

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1174
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1132
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1112 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1102 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	89%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 489
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1002
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 968

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 994
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 959
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 178 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 97
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 156
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 150

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	66%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 148
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 941 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 934 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 409
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	19%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 855
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 827

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 850
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 821
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 266 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 129
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 190
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 188

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 186
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (95%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 90 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 68
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	24%
State average from 443 schools:	60%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	56%
State average from 440 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	71%
State average from 443 schools:	85%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	21%
State average from 443 schools:	46%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	45%
State average from 441 schools:	59%

Making Math Gains

Here:	73%
State average from 442 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	54%
State average from 442 schools:	56%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	77%
State average from 441 schools:	66%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	421
State average from 441 schools:	522

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 448 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 446 schools:	46%

Minority Rate

Here:	99%
State average from 451 schools:	45%

Region: 5

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1258 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1252 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 675
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1085

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1078
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1026 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1020 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 560
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 930
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 888

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 923
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 882
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 189 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 189 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 167
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	62%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 168
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 160
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 674 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 670 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	84%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 363
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 611
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 587

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	54%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 609
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 586
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	69%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 160
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 225
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 220

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 219
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 85 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	55%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 80
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 78
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	20%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	45%
State average from 425 schools:	75%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	74%
State average from 425 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	22%
State average from 425 schools:	45%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	39%
State average from 425 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	62%
State average from 425 schools:	74%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	47%
State average from 425 schools:	55%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	66%
State average from 425 schools:	71%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	375
State average from 425 schools:	526

Percent Tested

Here:	97%
State average from 425 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: F

Grade in 2007: F

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	52%
State average from 425 schools:	42%

Minority Rate

Here:	99%
State average from 425 schools:	44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1425 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1411 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	82%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 733
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	16%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1341
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1202

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	37%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1318
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1172
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1172 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1160 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 607
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1101
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 977

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	33%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1079
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 949
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 202 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	88%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 195
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 181

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 192
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 178
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 780 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 768 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	81%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 365
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	16%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 741
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 664

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	40%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 729
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 651
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 342 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 334 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 305
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	15%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 296
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 198
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 140 (93%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 146 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 85
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 134
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 125

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	10%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

Grade in 2007: I

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	56%
State average from 372 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	98%
State average from 372 schools:	48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: I
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: I

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	20%
State average from 360 schools:	45%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	46%
State average from 361 schools:	68%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	71%
State average from 361 schools:	83%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	44%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Making Math Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 361 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	53%
State average from 361 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	301
State average from 361 schools:	374

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 361 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: D

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	52%
State average from 362 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	98%
State average from 362 schools:	47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1501 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1489 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 763
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	17%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1413
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	38%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1395
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1210 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1200 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	77%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 627

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	12%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1144
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1130
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	83%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 111

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 226
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 222
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 825 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 817 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	79%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 385

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	14%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 769
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 761
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 287 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 284 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 144
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 267
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 266
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 169 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 165 (92%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient

Here:	39%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 71
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 163
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	6%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 160
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	18%
State average from 348 schools:	42%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	45%
State average from 348 schools:	67%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	82%
State average from 348 schools:	84%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	42%
State average from 348 schools:	51%

Making Math Gains

Here:	67%
State average from 348 schools:	73%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	57%
State average from 348 schools:	53%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns

Here:	311
State average from 348 schools:	371

Percent Tested

Here:	98%
State average from 348 schools:	98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: D

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	47%
State average from 347 schools:	38%

Minority Rate

Here:	98%
State average from 348 schools:	45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1784
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	286
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	43%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	36%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	14%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	4%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	20%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	9
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1778
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	273
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	30%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	63%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	7%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	5%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	17%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	282
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	46%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	36%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	15%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	2%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	17%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1866
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	285
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	26%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	29%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	2%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	45%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	3
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	1949
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	72%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	20%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	25%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	20%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	55%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	6
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1808
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	291
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1775
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	277
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1898
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	294
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	1931
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 705

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Unscore - Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1696
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	1714
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	261
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	274
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	1817
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	271
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1901
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	303
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	671
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

Here:	669
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

Here:	38
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	10
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	9
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	6
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	11
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	4
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	749
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	41
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	8
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 760

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	257
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 63%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	1703
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	272
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1729
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	1680
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 48

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1729
State average from 573 schools:	1879

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	263
State average:	291

Percent Passing: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1755
State average:	1873

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1729
State average:	1876

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 27

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	270
State average:	295

% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1795
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	264
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 80%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1819
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	1767
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 52

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1884
State average from 581 schools:	1950

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	315

Percent Passing: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 85%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1892
State average:	1939

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1838
State average:	1901

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 53

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 653

Mean Scale Score

Here:	673
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 41
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 755

Mean Scale Score

Here:	684
State average from 575 schools:	695

Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 648

Mean Scale Score

Here:	692
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 54
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 752

Mean Scale Score

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	698
State average from 575 schools:	710

Median NPR: 46
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 768

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

NORTH MIAMI SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL:	257
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 24%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	3
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 68%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%