Oak Grove Middle School in Clearwater, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 55.

1370 S BELCHER RD
Clearwater, FL 33764

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hospital/Homebound School (0.8 miles):

90
Project Craft School (19.9 miles):

74
Davidsen Middle School (11.8 miles):

59
Oak Grove Middle School:

55
Pinellas Preparatory Academy School (3.3 miles):

48
Pinellas Park Middle School (7.8 miles):

39
Orange Grove Middle Magnet School (18.9 miles):

26
Calvin A. Hunsinger School (3.6 miles):

13
Pace Center For Girls School (7.9 miles):

0
Oak Grove Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pinellas County:

51
Clearwater:

44
Oak Grove Middle School:

55

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Clearwater, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 524-4430 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 52
School number: 2861
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 524-4416
Principal: Dawn E Coffin
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 52
Senate District: 13
School Web Address: http://www.oakgrove-ms.pinellas.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

88%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

521
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: B

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

56%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

38%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 4

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1260 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 359
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1180
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1131

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1180
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 779 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 780 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 234
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 734
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 705

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 734
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 703
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 134 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 117
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 71
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 222

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 221
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 701 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 701 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 186
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 647
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 615

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

47%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 646
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 611
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 93
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 94
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 45
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

32%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 155
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 144

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 154
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 143
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

95%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

49%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

72%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

62%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

555
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

43%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

32%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 4


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1102 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 337
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1061
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1010

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1060
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1011
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 749 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 748 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 235
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 732
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 693

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 731
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 692
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 89
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 46
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 153

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 157
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 154
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 477 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 476 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 444
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 419

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

49%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 443
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 419
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 48
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 139
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 134
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

48%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

63%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

550
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 969 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 969 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 314
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 936
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 906

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 937
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 907
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 693 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 693 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 242
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 673
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 653

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 674
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 654
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 86
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 81
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 124 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 29

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 116
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 339 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 339 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 320
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 307

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 321
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 308
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 38 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 31
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 139 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 139 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 128
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 121

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 129
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 122
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

78%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 539 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 538 schools:

44%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 539 schools:

61%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math Gains
Here:

72%
State average from 539 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

60%
State average from 539 schools:

64%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 539 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

567
State average from 539 schools:

523
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 539 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

38%
State average from 541 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 542 schools:

53%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 422 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 423 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 406
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 123 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 124 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 121
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

84%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 122
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 95
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 96
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 176 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 69
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

69%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 170
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 167 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 168 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 161
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

79%
State average from 526 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 526 schools:

63%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 526 schools:

89%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 526 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 526 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 526 schools:

72%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

472
State average from 526 schools:

425
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 526 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 525 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 526 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 458 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 458 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 147
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 438
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 438
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 126 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 126 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 48

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 125
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 125
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 100 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 100 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 31

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 94
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 204 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 204 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 60

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 195
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 195
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 155 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 155 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 53

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 70
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

69%
State average from 505 schools:

59%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 505 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

83%
State average from 506 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

61%
State average from 505 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 505 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 505 schools:

66%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

402
State average from 506 schools:

397
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 506 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

34%
State average from 506 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 506 schools:

50%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1493
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

36%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

45%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

87%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1691
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1746
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

86%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1692
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

22%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

13
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1851
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

17%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

26%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

73%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1875
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1738
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

61%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

30%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

4%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

48%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

304
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

23%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

92%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

4
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

3
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1562
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

36%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

39%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

93%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1676
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

25%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1734
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

10%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

71%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1664
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

28%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

46%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1802
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

18%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

58%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1895
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

320
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

48%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

15%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

68%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1800
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

45%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

40%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

15%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1807
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

280
State average:

326
Percent Passing
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

30%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

2
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1494
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1701
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1698
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1748
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

318
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1791
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1943
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1623
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1611
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

330
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1550
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1654
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1741
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1801
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

309
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1908
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1735
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 1
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1858
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 119
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 97%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 343
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

5
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 9%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 8
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1638
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1693
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1687
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1945
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1578
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 4%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1577
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1480
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1628
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1769
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

354
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1665
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1835
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

317
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1918
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1724
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

243
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1833
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

124
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

645
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

71
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

115
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

119
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

678
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

80
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

321
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

330
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

689
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

317
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

697
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

13
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

21
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

652
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

9
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

665
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

25
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 115
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

337
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 80%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 321
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

308
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 11%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 12
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

253
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 25%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 67%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1347
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1524
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1544
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1404
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 141

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1670
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1679
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1559
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 121

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1449
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1570
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1582
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1446
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 136

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1698
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

339
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1710
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1589
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 120

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 129
Mean Scale Score
Here:

637
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 152
Mean Scale Score
Here:

641
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 143
Mean Scale Score
Here:

666
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 128
Mean Scale Score
Here:

638
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 72
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 152
Mean Scale Score
Here:

651
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 75
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 143
Mean Scale Score
OAK GROVE MIDDLE SCHOOL:

668
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 150
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

319
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 71%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 87%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 81%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2019 Advameg, Inc.