
Back to: Hollywood, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 50.
1507 N 28TH AVE
Hollywood, FL 33020
Other nearby schools ratings:
Oakridge Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Broward County:  47  Hollywood:  48  Oakridge Elementary School:  50 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Hollywood, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (754) 3236700 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 6
School number: 461
School type: Elementary
District Name: BROWARD
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (754) 3236740
Principal: Alan Gatzke
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 20
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 99
Senate District: 31
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  81%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  81%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  57%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  63%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  54%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  47%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  58%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  527  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  75%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  28%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 359 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 359 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 101
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 335
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 320
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 335
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 320
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 264 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 264 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 76
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 239
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 247
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 239
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 275 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 275 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 242
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 255
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 242
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 48
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  80%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  76%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  95%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  45%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  65%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  69%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  54%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  63%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  547  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  71%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  28%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 385 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 385 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 118
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 363
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 352
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 363
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 352
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 285 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 285 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 86
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 268
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 277
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 268
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 284 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 284 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 263
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 253
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 263
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 253
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 67
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  79%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  78%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  88%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  54%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  64%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  63%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  61%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  554  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: B
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: B
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  61%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  25%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 442 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 441 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 158
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 402
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 388
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 401
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 387
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 332 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 331 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 123
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 312
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 303
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 311
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 302
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 96
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 233
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 225
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 232
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 224
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 68
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 68
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 68
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  69%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  69%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  82%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  53%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  72%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  64%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  64%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  74%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  547  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  69%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  73%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 382 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 383 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 356
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 357
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 104 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 100
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 31
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 147 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 138
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 275 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 275 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  94%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 80
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  41%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 67 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 67 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  73%  State average from 643 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  71%  State average from 643 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  90%  State average from 643 schools:  81% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  72%  State average from 643 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  73%  State average from 643 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  69%  State average from 643 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  448  State average from 643 schools:  420 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 643 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  66%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  73%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 400 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 399 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 113
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 366
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 366
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 107 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  100%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 37
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 93
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 93
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 31
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 119
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 119
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 141 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 141 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 40
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 133
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 133
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 260 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 71
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 231
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 231
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 62
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 62
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 64 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 59
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  39%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 59
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  69%  State average from 631 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  63%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 631 schools:  80% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  63%  State average from 631 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  56%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  56%  State average from 631 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  400  State average from 631 schools:  417 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 631 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: B
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: C
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  66%  State average from 631 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  72%  State average from 631 schools:  52% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1469  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  40%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  81%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1656  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  32%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  14%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  79%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1600  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  17%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  22%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  24%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  62%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1737  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1818  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  17%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  25%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1898  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  17%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  27%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  56%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1989  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  324  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  17%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  27%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  27%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  17%  State average:  12% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  56%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2058  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  63%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  30%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  16%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  25%  State average:  12% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  48%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16  State average:  15 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  20%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  31%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  49%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  24%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  33%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8%  State average:  8% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  43%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  24%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  27%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  37%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  49%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1550  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  354  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  39%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  20%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  84%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1563  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  11%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  49%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  23%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  78%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1667  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  333  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  24%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  59%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1673  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  28%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6%  State average:  8% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  53%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1813  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  312  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  22%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  19%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  59%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1908  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  42%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  17%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1995  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  10%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  73%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2043  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  338  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  88%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  32%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  75%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1494  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  332  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1611  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 08%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1613  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1723  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1821  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1905  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2019  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  330  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2044  State average:  1921 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  299 
Percent Passing: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1589  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  363  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1575  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1676  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  335  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1693  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1816  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1906  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2007  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  326  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2042  State average:  1972 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  321 
Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 124
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 92%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 368
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 397
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 73%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1454  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 80%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1480  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1656  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1697  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1825  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1906  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2012  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  329  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2029  State average:  1935 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  302 
Percent Passing: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1488  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1465  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  302  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1720  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  344  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1655  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  306  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1832  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1931  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1997  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  2027  State average:  1984 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  334  State average:  323 
Percent Passing: 83%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  153  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  637  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Informational (max 18)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  639  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPROAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  58  State average:  69 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  8 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  122  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  668  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Informational (max 18)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  321  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  672  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  333  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  687  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  306  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  693  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Literary (max 18)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Interpretation (max 20)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Strategies (max 10)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  7 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  430  State average:  273 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  713  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Literary (max 18)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  13 
Informational (max 18)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  11 
Initial Understanding (max 12)OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  7 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  398  State average:  237 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  724  State average from 2096 schools:  709 
Median NPROAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  79  State average:  65 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 170
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  299  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 81%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 321
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  291  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 44%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 84%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 407
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  306  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 77%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1292  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1400  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 47%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1429  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1318  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 111
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1608  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1617  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006OAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1515  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 103
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1426  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1462  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  301  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1483  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1414  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 70
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1643  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  328  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1657  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1501  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 155
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 146
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  628  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 57
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 124
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  626  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 47
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 13
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 121
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  665  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 70
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 146
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  632  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 124
Mean Scale ScoreOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  638  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 66
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 120
Mean Scale ScoreOAKRIDGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  662  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 117
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  294  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 79%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 66%
