U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Okaloosa Applied Tech Center School in Fort Walton Beach, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Fort Walton Beach, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 46.

1976 LEWIS TURNER BLVD
Fort Walton Beach, FL 32547

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Collegiate High At Northwest Florida State College School (10.0 miles):

97
Choctawhatchee Senior High School (1.1 miles):

82
Elliott Point Elementary School (3.4 miles):

73
Lula J. Edge Elementary School (8.6 miles):

65
James E Plew Elementary School (10.0 miles):

56
Destin Middle School (12.6 miles):

51
Okaloosa Applied Tech Center School:

46
W. E. Combs School (4.0 miles):

32
Okaloosa Applied Tech Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Okaloosa County:

54
Fort Walton Beach:

53
Okaloosa Applied Tech Center:

46

Report this comment as inappropriate
Apr 18, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
I would like information on the programs you offer. If you could e-mail me telling me how to receive this information I would certainly appreciate it. I'm very interested in learning as much as I can about your school. Thank you.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jun 13, 2011 @ 1:13 pm
I would like information on programs that you have
Report this comment as inappropriate
Sep 14, 2011 @ 9:09 am
I would like information on the programs you offer. If you could e-mail me telling me how to receive this information I would certainly appreciate it. I'm very interested in learning as much as I can about your school. Thank you.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Oct 13, 2011 @ 6:18 pm
I would like information on your culinary program. I am very interested and would love to learn more about your school.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jan 9, 2012 @ 12:12 pm
I would like to know about your cosmetology class. I am very interested and wanting to start the class as soon as possible.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jan 23, 2012 @ 10:22 pm
Could you please send me information about your school on cosmetology. I am definitely interested in your school. Thank you.
Report this comment as inappropriate
Oct 29, 2012 @ 8:08 am
could you please email me information on the programs that you offer that are open at this time. I need to get back into school, I have a high school diploma and some college. But do not have a trade in a certain area and due to this I can not find a job. I would really like to start classes as soon as possible. Any information that you can give me in deeply appericated. Thanks in advance
Elliot G
Report this comment as inappropriate
Jan 4, 2014 @ 12:12 pm
Please send me a list of your classes and dates for the next semester please

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA





Phone: (850) 833-3500 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 46
School number: 701
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: OKALOOSA
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN AND GRADES 6 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 833-3466
Principal: Frank Fuller
The function/setting of the school: Area Vocational-Technical Center
The main educational program offered at the school: Vocational/Technical
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 4
Senate District: 4

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

98%
State average from 10 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

96%
State average from 10 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 10 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

87%
State average from 10 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 10 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 10 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 10 schools:

60%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 10 schools:

72%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

696
State average from 10 schools:

542
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 10 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

12%
State average from 10 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 10 schools:

41%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 426 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 426 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 133
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 421
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 409

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 421
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 409
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 301 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 298
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 47
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 46
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 50
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

97%
State average from 10 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 10 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 10 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

87%
State average from 10 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 10 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 10 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

90%
State average from 10 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 10 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

697
State average from 10 schools:

565
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 10 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

10%
State average from 10 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 10 schools:

41%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 421 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 421 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 146
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 395
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 297 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 290
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 282
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 41
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

96%
State average from 10 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 10 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 11 schools:

79%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

86%
State average from 10 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

82%
State average from 10 schools:

69%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 10 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

88%
State average from 10 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

82%
State average from 10 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

692
State average from 10 schools:

553
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 10 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: A

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

8%
State average from 10 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 10 schools:

40%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 419 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 419 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 128
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 394

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 408
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 393
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 310 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 310 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 300
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 38
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 55
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (69%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (69%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (59%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (55%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24 (75%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26 (76%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1663
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

2%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

52%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

22%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

96%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1831
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

362
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

41%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

28%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1909
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

54%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

95%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

19
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1446
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

45%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

31%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1682
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

27%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

39%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

1%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

49%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

15
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1820
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

280
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

32%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

11%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

13
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

12
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

11
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

16%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1674
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

381
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

20%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

32%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

95%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1784
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

2%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

38%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

32%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

93%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1879
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

378
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

8%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

17%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

36%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

90%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

10
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1496
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

58%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

14%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

21%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1735
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

293
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

23%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

45%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

53%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1888
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

67%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

24%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

10%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1641
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 01%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 26%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1937
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1495
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

272
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1712
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1696
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

257
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

361
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1667
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

379
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1781
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1855
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

373
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 9
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1499
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1765
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

1879
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

316
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1869
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

295
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 42%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 149
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 343
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 22
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1652
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

358
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1829
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

362
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 23
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1854
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1645
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1756
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

281
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1764
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

358
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

282
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1704
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

387
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 39%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1747
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

367
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 97%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1841
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

370
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1690
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

1810
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1836
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

276
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1924
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

309
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

145
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

135
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

682
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

88
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

139
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

691
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

88
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

379
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

662
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

55
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

357
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

61
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

12
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

8
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

16
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

54
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 135
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

352
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 78%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 10
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 14
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 85%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 3

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

259
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 35%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 35%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 47%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1424
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

244
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1414
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1407
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1764
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

283
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1737
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1805
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -69

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1770
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

271
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 10
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

1776
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1892
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -117

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1736
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

1697
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1740
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -43

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1881
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

298
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 71%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1895
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
OKALOOSA APPLIED TECH CENTER:

1942
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -47

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale Score
Here:

688
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 46
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 9
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 2

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 3

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 18
Mean Scale Score
Here:

703
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 54
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 1
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 25
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

265
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 28%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 60%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 52%

Back to: Fort Walton Beach, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.