U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Okeechobee Correctional Institution School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Okeechobee, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.



City-data.com school rating (weighted overall 2010 test average compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 83.

Okeechobee, FL 34973

Okeechobee Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

48
Okeechobee County:

33
Okeechobee, FL:

33
This School:

83
Other nearby schools ratings:
Okeechobee Correctional Institution School:

83
Pemayetv Emahakv "our Way " School (0.1 miles):

80
North Elementary School (1.6 miles):

57
Seminole Elementary School (3.1 miles):

54
South Elementary School (1.7 miles):

53
Central Elementary School (0.5 miles):

49
Okeechobee Freshman Campus School (0.4 miles):

28
New Endeavor High School (1.8 miles):

13

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA


Okeechobee, FL forum
Recent posts about schools in Okeechobee, Florida on our local forum with over 1,500,000 registered users:
best schools near MIA  (22 replies)
moving to Okeechobee  (27 replies)
best schools near MIA  (5 replies)
how are miami schools?  (22 replies)
Need help with beer and educated friends  (10 replies)
Need info on Okeechobee area  (16 replies)

Latest news about schools in Okeechobee, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations

Phone: (941) 462-5442 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 4041
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 462-5430
Principal: Barbara Mack
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

67%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

75%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

663
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 454 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 454 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 438
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 420

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 438
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 420
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 388 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 388 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 362

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 362
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

94%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

83%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

664
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 444 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 444 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 433
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 419

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 429
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 383 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 383 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 362

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 358
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

88%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

655
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 465 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 436

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 436
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 396 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 396 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1553
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

44%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

42%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1934
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

366
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

52%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

11
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

370
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

18%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

49%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

91%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1688
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

376
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

33%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

373
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

29%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

37%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1510
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1767
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1744
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1859
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

373
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1912
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1547
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1766
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

336
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1911
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1763
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

370
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 35%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1885
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

119
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

651
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

113
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

82
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

123
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

683
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

84
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

113
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

702
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

86
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 111
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

343
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 82%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

Back to: Okeechobee, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.