U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Okeechobee Correctional Institution School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Okeechobee, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 94.


Okeechobee, FL 34973

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Pemayetv Emahakv "our Way " School (0.1 miles):

98
Okeechobee Correctional Institution School:

94
Seminole Elementary School (3.1 miles):

48
North Elementary School (1.6 miles):

41
Everglades Elementary School (2.5 miles):

40
Okeechobee Freshman Campus School (0.4 miles):

33
South Elementary School (1.7 miles):

33
New Endeavor High School (1.8 miles):

20
Okeechobee Correctional Institution School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Okeechobee County:

39
Okeechobee:

39
This School:

94

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Okeechobee, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations


Phone: (941) 462-5442 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 76
School number: 4041
School type: Adult
District Name: CESA
Grade range: ADULT
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 462-5430
Principal: Barbara Mack
The function/setting of the school: Adult Education
The main educational program offered at the school: Adult

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 133 schools:

87%
Meeting High Standards in Science
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

91%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

79%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

67%
State average from 133 schools:

59%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

75%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

663
State average from 133 schools:

541
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 133 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 133 schools:

43%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 454 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 454 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 94
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 438
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 420

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 438
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 420
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 388 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 388 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 362

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 376
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 362
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 118 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 118 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 107
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 93 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 90
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

94%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

93%
State average from 133 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

92%
State average from 133 schools:

91%
Meeting High Standards in Science
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

83%
State average from 133 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 133 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

664
State average from 133 schools:

557
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 133 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 132 schools:

48%
Minority Rate
Here:

14%
State average from 133 schools:

42%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 444 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 444 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 433
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 419

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 429
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 415
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 383 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 383 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 362

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 358
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 99
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 97
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 104

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 101
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

93%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 131 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 131 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

88%
State average from 131 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 131 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

81%
State average from 131 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

65%
State average from 131 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 131 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

655
State average from 131 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 131 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

20%
State average from 131 schools:

47%
Minority Rate
Here:

15%
State average from 131 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 465 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 465 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 105
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 436

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 448
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 436
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 396 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 396 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 384
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 372
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 77
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 73
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 105 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 105 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 103
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 100
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1553
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

44%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

19
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1699
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

340
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

20%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

21
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1884
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

42%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

12
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1934
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

34%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

27%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

366
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

52%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

88%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

11
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1626
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

370
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

18%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

49%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

24%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

91%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1688
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

353
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

11%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

27%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

40%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

85%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

376
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

1%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

22%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

33%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1944
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

373
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

7%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

29%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

37%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

89%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1510
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1767
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

360
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1602
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

1744
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1859
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

373
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 11
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 10
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1912
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 90%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1547
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1766
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

351
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

336
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1911
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 10

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1763
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

370
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 35%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1837
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1885
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

119
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

651
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

76
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

113
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

82
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

123
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

683
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

84
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

113
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

702
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

86
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
OKEECHOBEE CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 111
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

343
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 82%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

Back to: Okeechobee, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.