Okeechobee Freshman Campus School in Okeechobee, Florida (FL)

Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories

Find:
Near:

Back to: Okeechobee, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.

City-data.com school rating (weighted overall 2010 test average compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28.
610 SW 2ND AVENUE
Okeechobee, FL 34974

Okeechobee Freshman Campus School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:

Florida:	48
Okeechobee County:	33
Okeechobee, FL:	33
Okeechobee Freshman Campus School:	28

Other nearby schools ratings:

Okeechobee Correctional Institution School (0.4 miles):	83
Pemayetv Emahakv "our Way " School (0.4 miles):	80
North Elementary School (2.0 miles):	57
Seminole Elementary School (3.3 miles):	54
Everglades Elementary School (2.5 miles):	50
Central Elementary School (0.2 miles):	49
Okeechobee Freshman Campus School:	28
New Endeavor High School (1.4 miles):	13

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

Recent posts about schools in Okeechobee, Florida on our local forum with over 1,500,000 registered users:

	best schools near MIA (22 replies)
	moving to Okeechobee (27 replies)
	best schools near MIA (5 replies)
	how are miami schools? (22 replies)
	Need help with beer and educated friends (10 replies)
	Need info on Okeechobee area (16 replies)

Latest news about schools in Okeechobee, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations

Phone: (863) 462-5288 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 47
School number: 21
School type: Senior High
District Name: OKEECHOBEE
Grade range: NINTH GRADE
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (863) 462-5258
Principal: Andy Brewer
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 79
Senate District: 17
School Web Address: http://www.okee.k12.fl.us/web.nsf

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 5 schools:	66%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	73%
State average from 5 schools:	71%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	69%
State average from 5 schools:	82%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	31%
State average from 5 schools:	48%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	43%
State average from 5 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	72%
State average from 5 schools:	65%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	30%
State average from 5 schools:	57%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	59%
State average from 5 schools:	65%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	435
State average from 5 schools:	518

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 5 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	44%
State average from 5 schools:	57%

Minority Rate

Here:	21%
State average from 5 schools:	39%

Region: 1

Title I: YES

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 281 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 281 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 144
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 260

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 260
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 220 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 220 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	90%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 110
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	46%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 206
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	27%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 136 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 136 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	80%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 66
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	31%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	50%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 127
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 124
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (97%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 33
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	48%
State average from 5 schools:	68%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	75%
State average from 5 schools:	73%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	68%
State average from 5 schools:	90%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	43%
State average from 5 schools:	53%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	59%
State average from 5 schools:	68%

Making Math Gains

Here:	75%
State average from 5 schools:	73%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	53%
State average from 5 schools:	69%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	62%
State average from 5 schools:	70%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	493
State average from 5 schools:	567

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 5 schools:	99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	41%
State average from 5 schools:	54%

Minority Rate

Here:	21%
State average from 5 schools:	37%

Region: 1

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 311 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 310 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	85%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 142
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	45%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 297
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 290

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	71%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 295
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 288
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 250 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 249 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	87%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 237
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 232

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	78%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 235
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 230
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	24%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	29%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 129 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 129 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	75%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	34%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 120
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 114

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 113
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading

Here:	45%
State average from 5 schools:	64%

Meeting High Standards in Math

Here:	74%
State average from 5 schools:	72%

Meeting High Standards in Writing

Here:	85%
State average from 5 schools:	87%

Meeting High Standards in Science

Here:	43%
State average from 5 schools:	47%

Making Reading Gains

Here:	53%
State average from 5 schools:	61%

Making Math Gains

Here:	74%
State average from 5 schools:	72%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading

Here:	44%
State average from 5 schools:	60%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math

Here:	61%
State average from 5 schools:	71%

11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 10

Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)

Here:	489
State average from 5 schools:	535

Percent Tested

Here:	99%
State average from 5 schools:	100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: NO

Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Reading: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate

Here:	35%
State average from 5 schools:	50%

Minority Rate

Here:	22%
State average from 5 schools:	37%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 325 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 326 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 154
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 319
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	68%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 320
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 302
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 256 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 257 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	92%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	47%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 251
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 235

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	74%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 253
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 239
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	10%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	32%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient

Here:	93%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 118
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 106

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	52%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 119
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 109
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (92%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (92%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 31
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 48%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 74%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 83%

Meeting High Standards in Science: 44%

Making Reading Gains: 70%

Making Math Gains: 77%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 80%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math: 70%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns: 546

Percent Tested: 98%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 44%

Minority Rate: 37%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 467 (98%)
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	43%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 446
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	67%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 445
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 297 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 296 (99%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	51%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	72%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 121 (98%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	23%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 114
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	53%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 209 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 208 (98%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	30%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 197
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	56%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 196
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (98%)

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	22%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 42%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 68%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 74%

Making Reading Gains: 62%

Making Math Gains: 75%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 68%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 389

Percent Tested: 100%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 49%

Minority Rate: 36%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 502 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 502 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	35%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 479
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	58%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 478
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 320 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 320 (99%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	42%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 306
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	63%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 306
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 133 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	20%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 124
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	49%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 123
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 244 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (99%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	25%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 232
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	48%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 230
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 102 (100%)

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	7%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 99
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient

Here:	21%
State average from 27 schools:	59%

Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 97
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading: 40%

Meeting High Standards in Math: 70%

Meeting High Standards in Writing: 78%

Making Reading Gains: 56%

Making Math Gains: 76%

of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading: 72%

Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns: 392

Percent Tested: 99%

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: B

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate: 48%

Minority Rate: 33%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1223
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	287
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	28%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	24%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	17%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	48%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	14
State average:	17

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	3
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1555
State average:	1604

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	324

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	17%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	19%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	26%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	31%
State average:	29%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	6%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	63%
State average:	72%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	19
State average:	19

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1599
State average:	1659

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	23%
State average:	15%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	42%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	18%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	65%
State average:	70%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	3
State average:	3

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	16

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	10
State average:	10

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	2
State average:	2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1972
State average:	1922

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	312

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	15%
State average:	25%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	29%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	37%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	11%
State average:	12%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	7%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	56%
State average:	45%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	12
State average:	11

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	1929
State average:	1938

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	300
State average:	302

Percent Passing

Here:	55%
State average:	56%

% in each Achievement Level 1

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	36%
State average:	35%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	32%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	20%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	8%
State average:	12%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	32%
State average:	37%

Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17

Here:	15
State average:	15

Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	321

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	19%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	44%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	31%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	4%
State average:	11%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	3%
State average:	4%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	37%
State average:	51%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	9
State average:	9

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	8
State average:	9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	24%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	46%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	29%
State average:	30%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	1%
State average:	5%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	29%
State average:	36%

Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1380
State average:	1481

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	317
State average:	339

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	10%
State average:	8%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	44%
State average:	32%

% in each Achievement Level 4

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	22%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	4%
State average:	16%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	70%
State average:	79%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	4
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1549
State average:	1585

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	321
State average:	330

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	10%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	16%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	38%
State average:	36%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	22%
State average:	26%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	7%
State average:	11%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	67%
State average:	74%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	4
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1663
State average:	1674

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	332
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	12%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	33%
State average:	23%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	28%
State average:	27%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	21%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 5

Here:	5%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	54%
State average:	63%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	7
State average:	7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	1952
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	9%
State average:	17%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	20%
State average:	22%

% in each Achievement Level 3

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	38%
State average:	31%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	27%
State average:	21%

% in each Achievement Level 5

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	7%
State average:	9%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	71%
State average:	61%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	4
State average:	4

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1993
State average:	1995

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	325
State average:	326

Percent Passing

Here:	80%
State average:	80%

% in each Achievement Level 1

Here:	13%
State average:	13%

% in each Achievement Level 2

Here:	21%
State average:	18%

% in each Achievement Level 3

Here:	27%
State average:	28%

% in each Achievement Level 4

Here:	34%
State average:	33%

% in each Achievement Level 5

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	5%
State average:	8%

Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above

Here:	66%
State average:	69%

Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12

Here:	7
State average:	7

Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8

Here:	5
State average:	5

Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7

Here:	6
State average:	6

Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6

Here:	8
State average:	8

Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7

Here:	5
State average:	5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1350
State average:	1402

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	308
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1535
State average:	1605

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 03%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1566
State average:	1656

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	295
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1941
State average:	1907

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	315
State average:	309

% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2008
State average:	1921

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	315
State average:	299

Percent Passing: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	301
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	306
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1443
State average:	1476

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	331
State average:	338

% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	1497
State average:	1578

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	328

% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1621
State average:	1675

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	323
State average:	334

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1940
State average:	1925

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	307
State average:	303

% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	2008
State average:	1972

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	329
State average:	321

Percent Passing: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 121

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 40%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 148

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	4
State average from 27 schools:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 64%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1297
State average:	1396

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	316

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	1458
State average:	1582

Mean Scale Score 100-500

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	299
State average:	320

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1553
State average:	1627

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	293
State average:	306

% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1780
State average:	1857

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	288
State average:	304

% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1929
State average:	1894

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	307

% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1982
State average:	1935

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	310
State average:	302

Percent Passing: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	297
State average:	311

% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	284
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	313
State average:	302

% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	1382
State average:	1461

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	318
State average:	335

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1451
State average:	1563

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	299
State average:	325

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1617
State average:	1668

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	322
State average:	333

% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1861
State average:	1882

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	312
State average:	317

% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

Here:	1934
State average:	1915

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	305
State average:	299

% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	2011
State average:	1984

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	330
State average:	323

Percent Passing: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:

Number of Students

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	154
State average:	103

Mean Scale Score

Here:	625
State average from 3241 schools:	633

Median NPR

Here:	54
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	126
State average:	97

Mean Scale Score

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	636
State average from 3233 schools:	653

Median NPR

Here:	56
State average:	69

Literary (max 18)

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	13
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	10

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	7
State average:	8

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	125
State average:	101

Mean Scale Score

Here:	658
State average from 3309 schools:	667

Median NPR

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	65
State average:	71

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	13
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	6
State average:	6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	3
State average:	190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	5
State average:	201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	12
State average:	192

Mean Scale Score

Here:	683
State average from 2497 schools:	687

Median NPR

Here:	60
State average:	63

Literary (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Informational (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	12

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	13

Initial Understanding (max 12)

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	10
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	7
State average:	7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Number of Students

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	177
State average:	273

Mean Scale Score

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	695
State average from 2275 schools:	694

Median NPR

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	63
State average:	61

Literary (max 18)

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	13
State average:	13

Informational (max 18)

Here:	11
State average:	11

Functional (max 18)

Here:	12
State average:	11

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	7
State average:	7

Interpretation (max 20)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	9
State average:	9

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	5
State average:	5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

Number of Students

Here:	157
State average:	237

Mean Scale Score

Here:	712
State average from 2096 schools:	709

Median NPR

Here:	70
State average:	65

Literary (max 18)

Here:	15
State average:	14

Informational (max 18)

Here:	13
State average:	13

Functional (max 18)

Here:	14
State average:	14

Initial Understanding (max 12)

Here:	8
State average:	8

Interpretation (max 20)

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	15
State average:	15

Critical Analysis (max 12)

Here:	11
State average:	10

Strategies (max 10)

Here:	8
State average:	8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 124

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	282
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 48%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 73%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 14

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	240
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 7%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

OKEECHOBEE FRESHMAN CAMPUS:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 50%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 157

Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined

Here:	300
State average from 27 schools:	59

% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 54%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10

Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined

Here:	4
State average:	59

Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1909
State average from 612 schools:	1849

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	309
State average:	298

% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1919
State average:	1837

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1808
State average:	1779

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 111

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000

Here:	1924
State average from 613 schools:	1884

Mean Scale Score 100-500

Here:	302
State average:	290

% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007

Here:	1934
State average:	1869

Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006

Here:	1870
State average:	1821

Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 64

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 466

Mean Scale Score

Here:	706
State average from 597 schools:	696

Median NPR: 72
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 464

Mean Scale Score

Here:	719
State average from 597 schools:	708

Median NPR: 77
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9