City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 72.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Tarpon Springs Fundamental Ele School (4.7 miles): | 97 |
| Carrollwood Elementary School (16.0 miles): | 75 |
| Palm Harbor Elementary School: | 72 |
| Anderson Elementary School (19.4 miles): | 63 |
| Gulf Highlands Elementary School (18.2 miles): | 55 |
| Northeast High School (18.3 miles): | 44 |
| Sawgrass Lake Elementary School (16.8 miles): | 33 |
| Calusa Elementary School (14.5 miles): | 22 |
Palm Harbor Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Pinellas County: | 51 |
| Palm Harbor: | 66 |
| Palm Harbor Elementary School: | 72 |
1
Michael P McLean
Jan 10, 2011 @ 11:11 am
Is this property advailable,seeing how it is closed! Would the county concider selling this property? Who would I speak to in regards to purchasing this property?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 3181
School type: Elementary
District Name: PINELLAS
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 669-1159
Principal: Robert B Mcfadden
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 10
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 48
Senate District: 11
School Web Address: http://it.pinellas.k12.fl.us/schools/ph-es
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 962 schools: | 53% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 64% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 52% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 42% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 66% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 536 |
| State average from 963 schools: | 543 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: NO
Grade in 2010: B
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 963 schools: | 47% |
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 172 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 63
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 170
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 39
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 51
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 130 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 130 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 51
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 128
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 69% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 52% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 64% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 67% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 602 |
| State average from 959 schools: | 560 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 29% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 4| Here: | 16% |
| State average from 959 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 207 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 207 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 192
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 193
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 53
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 162
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 55
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 74% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 48% |
Making Reading Gains
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 70% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 67% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 63% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 569 |
| State average from 954 schools: | 544 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 28% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15% |
| State average from 954 schools: | 45% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 195 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 197 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 64
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 184
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 172 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 157
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 159
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2006-2007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 82% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 43% |
Making Reading Gains
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 70% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 60% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
| Here: | 600 |
| State average from 862 schools: | 539 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 862 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 24% |
| State average from 865 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 15% |
| State average from 865 schools: | 56% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 213 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 213 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 97% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 184 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 184 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 98% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 84% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2005-2006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 83% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 69% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 66% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 62% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 61% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 431 |
| State average from 848 schools: | 413 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES| Here: | 99% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 22% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 58% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 13% |
| State average from 848 schools: | 55% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 55% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 64% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
2004-2005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 72% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 67% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 74% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 79% |
Making Reading Gains
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 68% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 68% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 56% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
| Here: | 444 |
| State average from 834 schools: | 412 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 100% |
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: A
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 21% |
| State average from 834 schools: | 60% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 11% |
| State average from 832 schools: | 54% |
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1459 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 326 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 26% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 41% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 76% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1574 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 15% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 69% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 20 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1699 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 12% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 39% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 3 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 11% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 23% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 61% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1583 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 361 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 13% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1608 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 34% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1751 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 350 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 37% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 77% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1574 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 345 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1692 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 08%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1694 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%| Here: | 324 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1617 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%| Here: | 369 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1574 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 327 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1728 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 346 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 65
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 2%| Here: | 5 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 15%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 92%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1546 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 341 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1668 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1730 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 324 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| Here: | 328 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 54%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1592 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%| Here: | 363 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1541 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1770 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| Here: | 354 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 58 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 651 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 76 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 66 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 658 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 74 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 15 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 68 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 683 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 84 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 66
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 9%| Here: | 326 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 73%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 42%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 89%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1492 |
| State average: | 1342 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 332 |
| State average: | 307 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1700 |
| State average from 1875 schools: | 1542 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 313 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1713 |
| State average: | 1546 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 148| Here: | 1564 |
| State average: | 1397 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1735 |
| State average from 1873 schools: | 1629 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 325 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1745 |
| State average: | 1632 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 128| Here: | 1617 |
| State average: | 1532 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 328 |
| State average: | 303 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1505 |
| State average: | 1413 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%| Here: | 344 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1598 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 1525 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%| Here: | 333 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| Here: | 1607 |
| State average: | 1528 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 44| Here: | 1563 |
| State average: | 1414 |
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
| Here: | 1761 |
| State average from 1872 schools: | 1647 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%| Here: | 353 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1769 |
| State average: | 1649 |
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 171| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 1598 |
| State average: | 1519 |
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 61
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 75| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 651 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 633 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 72| Here: | 656 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 642 |
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 74
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 80| PALM HARBOR ELEMENTARY SCHOOL: | 678 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 667 |
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 60
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 79| Here: | 648 |
| State average from 1891 schools: | 632 |
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 72
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 86| Here: | 672 |
| State average from 1874 schools: | 652 |
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 75
Mean Scale Score
Median NPR: 88| Here: | 690 |
| State average from 1870 schools: | 663 |
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 71
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 7%| Here: | 333 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 89%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 77%
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2023 Advameg, Inc.