City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 70.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Show street view
No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
| Disston Gifted Center School (15.8 miles): | 98 |
| Sunset Hills Elementary School (11.4 miles): | 74 |
| Paul B. Stephens Ese Center School: | 70 |
| Trinity Upper School (14.2 miles): | 60 |
| Doug Jamerson Elementary School (16.0 miles): | 49 |
| James W. Mitchell High School (14.5 miles): | 38 |
| West Tampa Elementary School (14.0 miles): | 28 |
| Middle -Plant City Area School (16.3 miles): | 16 |
Paul B. Stephens Ese Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
| Florida: | 45 |
| Pinellas County: | 51 |
| Clearwater: | 44 |
| Paul B. Stephens Ese Center: | 70 |
1
April
Apr 14, 2012 @ 10:22 pm
How many children in this school have Aspbergers Syndrome?
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
District Number: 52
School number: 681
School type: Combination Elementary and Secondary
District Name: PINELLAS
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 725-7985
Principal: Virginia S Wirt
The main educational program offered at the school: Special Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 50
Senate District: 16
School Web Address: http://www.stephens.pinellas.k12.fl.us
2009-2010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 90% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 78% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 85% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 54% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 66% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 68% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 62% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 62% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 69% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 620 |
| State average from 59 schools: | 560 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 34% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 54% |
Minority Rate
Region: 2| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 46% |
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 367 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 367 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 348
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 215 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 215 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 209
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 213
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 209
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 79 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 79 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 85% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 122 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 122 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 115
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 56
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2008-2009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 76% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 77% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 92% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 88% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 50% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 69% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 69% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 66% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 58 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| Here: | 653 |
| State average from 58 schools: | 564 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 100% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 31% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 51% |
Minority Rate
Region: 3| Here: | 41% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 379 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 379 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 115
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 354
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 355
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 218 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 215
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 77% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 116 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 116 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 74% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 103
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 67% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 78% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
2007-2008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in Reading
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 73% |
Meeting High Standards in Math
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 75% |
Meeting High Standards in Writing
| Here: | 79% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 83% |
Meeting High Standards in Science
| Here: | 67% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 47% |
Making Reading Gains
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 65% |
Making Math Gains
| Here: | 76% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 70% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
| Here: | 57% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 60% |
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
| Here: | 70% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 68% |
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 592 |
| State average from 59 schools: | 541 |
Percent Tested
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES| Here: | 100% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 99% |
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: B
Grade in 2000: A
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
| Here: | 26% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 47% |
Minority Rate
| Here: | 38% |
| State average from 59 schools: | 46% |
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 361 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 361 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 83% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 334
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 86% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 334
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 232 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 232 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 91% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 213
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 75% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 88 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 65% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 72% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 79
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 71% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (65%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (63%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (65%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 31 (65%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 88% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 94% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22 (69%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20 (67%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (65%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (63%)
Writing Performance Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 93% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
| Here: | 73% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 89 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 89 (100%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 82% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 64 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 89% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 134 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 133 (99%)
Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 80% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 87% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
| Here: | 81% |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59% |
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1505 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 25% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 48% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 10% |
| State average: | 8% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 83% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 19 |
| State average: | 17 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1701 |
| State average: | 1604 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 340 |
| State average: | 324 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 9% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 36% |
| State average: | 29% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 83% |
| State average: | 72% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 21 |
| State average: | 19 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1833 |
| State average: | 1659 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 343 |
| State average: | 312 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 3% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 8% |
| State average: | 15% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 29% |
| State average: | 33% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 41% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 19% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 89% |
| State average: | 70% |
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 4 |
| State average: | 3 |
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
| Here: | 18 |
| State average: | 16 |
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 10 |
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
| Here: | 2 |
| State average: | 2 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 348 |
| State average: | 321 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 5% |
| State average: | 18% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 20% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 49% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 18% |
| State average: | 11% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 4% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 75% |
| State average: | 51% |
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1593 |
| State average: | 1481 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 363 |
| State average: | 339 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 8% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 4% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 32% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 30% |
| State average: | 31% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 32% |
| State average: | 16% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 90% |
| State average: | 79% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 1708 |
| State average: | 1585 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 358 |
| State average: | 330 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 10% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 6% |
| State average: | 16% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| Here: | 28% |
| State average: | 36% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| Here: | 33% |
| State average: | 26% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 27% |
| State average: | 11% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 87% |
| State average: | 74% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 6 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 5 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 5 |
| State average: | 4 |
2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1784 |
| State average: | 1674 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
| Here: | 357 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 1
| Here: | 7% |
| State average: | 13% |
% in each Achievement Level 2
| Here: | 12% |
| State average: | 23% |
% in each Achievement Level 3
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 25% |
| State average: | 27% |
% in each Achievement Level 4
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 40% |
| State average: | 28% |
% in each Achievement Level 5
| Here: | 16% |
| State average: | 9% |
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
| Here: | 81% |
| State average: | 63% |
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 7 |
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1538 |
| State average: | 1402 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1772 |
| State average: | 1605 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 03%| Here: | 352 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 04%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1810 |
| State average: | 1656 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 339 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 334 |
| State average: | 317 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1561 |
| State average: | 1476 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%| Here: | 356 |
| State average: | 338 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1733 |
| State average: | 1578 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%| Here: | 364 |
| State average: | 328 |
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 95%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1754 |
| State average: | 1675 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 351 |
| State average: | 334 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results
2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 117
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%| Here: | 4 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 49%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 91%
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1510 |
| State average: | 1396 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| Here: | 335 |
| State average: | 316 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1732 |
| State average: | 1582 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 345 |
| State average: | 320 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1692 |
| State average: | 1627 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%| Here: | 318 |
| State average: | 306 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 1655 |
| State average: | 1696 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%| Here: | 301 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 329 |
| State average: | 311 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1586 |
| State average: | 1461 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 362 |
| State average: | 335 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 24%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1722 |
| State average: | 1563 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%| Here: | 361 |
| State average: | 325 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 96%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1734 |
| State average: | 1668 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 347 |
| State average: | 333 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
| Here: | 1714 |
| State average: | 1670 |
Mean Scale Score 100-500
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%| Here: | 319 |
| State average: | 309 |
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 121 |
| State average: | 103 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 648 |
| State average from 3241 schools: | 633 |
Median NPR
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 73 |
| State average: | 61 |
Literary (max 18)
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 113 |
| State average: | 97 |
Mean Scale Score
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 670 |
| State average from 3233 schools: | 653 |
Median NPR
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 82 |
| State average: | 69 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 15 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 11 |
| State average: | 10 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 16 |
| State average: | 15 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 8 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 122 |
| State average: | 101 |
Mean Scale Score
| Here: | 679 |
| State average from 3309 schools: | 667 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 81 |
| State average: | 71 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 14 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 15 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 10 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 6 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
| Here: | 89 |
| State average: | 190 |
Mean Scale Score
| PAUL B. STEPHENS ESE CENTER: | 662 |
| State average from 2604 schools: | 671 |
Median NPR
| Here: | 55 |
| State average: | 63 |
Literary (max 18)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 13 |
Informational (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 12 |
Functional (max 18)
| Here: | 12 |
| State average: | 13 |
Initial Understanding (max 12)
| Here: | 8 |
| State average: | 8 |
Interpretation (max 20)
| Here: | 13 |
| State average: | 14 |
Critical Analysis (max 12)
| Here: | 9 |
| State average: | 9 |
Strategies (max 10)
| Here: | 7 |
| State average: | 7 |
2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 112
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 3%| Here: | 335 |
| State average from 27 schools: | 59 |
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%| Here: | 4 |
| State average: | 59 |
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 37%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 79%
2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1
2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 1
City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site. Use at your own risk.
Website © 2023 Advameg, Inc.