|
Back to: Peach Springs, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 15.
Address: 403 Diamond Creek Road
Peach Springs, WI 86434
Grade span: K-6
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 05:00 PM
Principal: Dr. Eugene F. Thomas
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 769-2613
Fax: (928) 769-2892
Homepage:
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 4
- Grade 6
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: |  26.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: |  22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 87.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 96.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2002: 209
Enrollment In 2003: 191
Enrollment In 2004: 159
Enrollment In 2005: 158
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 98.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 14.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 10.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 14.50
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 12.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 8.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 12.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 8.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 12.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 31
All Students Percent Tested: 103%
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 64.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Female Tested: 15
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 747 schools: | 16.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 56.15% |
Male Tested: 15
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 657 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 17.90% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 55.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 28
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 616 schools: | 13.35% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 57.67% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 19
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 38.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 12.64% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 16.43% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 89%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 17
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 20.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 10.31% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 25.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 925 schools: | 54.83% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 9.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 12.75% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 27.38% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 36.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 52.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 8.70% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 24.05% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 58.09% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 20
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 43.12% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.06% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 15.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 35.14% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 46.72% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 22.22% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 92%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 87%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 32
All Students Percent Tested: 107%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 10.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 10.03% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 20.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
Female Tested: 15
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 585 schools: | 10.75% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 26.18% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 36.57% |
Male Tested: 17
Male Percent Tested: 113%
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 25.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 28
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 97%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 9.44% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 513 schools: | 7.22% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 78.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 21.64% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 639 schools: | 37.42% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 19
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 24.99% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 30.75% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 16
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 89%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 17
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 16
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 45.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Grade 3: | 9.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 19.99% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 20.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 10.99% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 45.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 51.29% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 12.22% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 18.70% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 856 schools: | 50.15% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 18
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 9.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 17.53% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 35.0% | | State average from 912 schools: | 53.91% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 20
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 30.30% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 44.63% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 15.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 25.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 50.39% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 22
All Students Percent Tested: 92%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
Female Tested: 13
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 14
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 87%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 24
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 28.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Male Tested: 17
Male Percent Tested: 106%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 22.69% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 25.12% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 785 schools: | 43.42% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 21
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 105%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 15
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 236 schools: | 34.82% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 205 schools: | 20.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 13.38% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 22.19% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 51.13% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 40.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 41.36% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 91%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 20
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 10.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 11
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 26.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 30.71% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 23
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 10.88% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Female Tested: 11
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 21.86% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 60.56% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 92%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 13.43% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 73.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 25.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 18.0% | | State average from 841 schools: | 54.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 20
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 15
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 73.0% | | State average from 345 schools: | 41.11% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 33.27% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 20
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 16.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 65.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 10.07% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 8.61% |
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 341 schools: | 25.38% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 43.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 15
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 40.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 32.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 9.55% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 826 schools: | 10.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 4.13% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 23
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 35.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 12.45% |
Male Tested: 17
Male Percent Tested: 106%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 679 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 25.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 37.80% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 12.59% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 20
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 12.69% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 14
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 93%
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 253 schools: | 54.30% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 15
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 538 schools: | 9.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 34.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 13.28% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 20
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 5.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Grade 5: | 5.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 10
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 30.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 50.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 14.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 10.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 10
Male Percent Tested: 91%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 20
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 95%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 11
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 21.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 47.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 12.79% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 25
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 30.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 14.02% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 904 schools: | 19.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
Female Tested: 11
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.27% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 19.81% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 49.58% |
Male Tested: 14
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.23% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.29% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 844 schools: | 46.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 22
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 10.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 18.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Limited English Proficient Students Tested: 17
Limited English Proficient Students Percent Tested: 100%
Limited English Proficient Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 348 schools: | 27.96% |
Limited English Proficient Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 56.0% | | State average from 351 schools: | 30.11% |
Limited English Proficient Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 352 schools: | 37.83% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 652 schools: | 20.35% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 697 schools: | 25.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 21
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 33.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 24.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
Male Tested: 12
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 15
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 42.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 19
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 25.46% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 54.33% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 11
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 4: | 45.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 59%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 14.58% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 19
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 47.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
Male Tested: 11
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 12.66% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 48.00% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 11
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 10
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 59%
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 31
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
Female Tested: 15
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 23.38% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 63.79% |
Male Tested: 16
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 715 schools: | 27.02% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 57.22% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 25
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Grade 6: | 8.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 23.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 64.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 27
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 16.64% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 34.19% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 48.54% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 31
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 35.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
Female Tested: 15
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 16.96% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 688 schools: | 20.37% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 47.76% |
Male Tested: 16
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 21.36% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 6: | 38.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 18.94% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 44.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 25
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 14.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 19.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 28.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 49.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 27
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 27.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 571 schools: | 24.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 41.04% |
|
