Pewitt J H School in Omaha, TX
(06-08 • Public • Regular School)
City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 26
- Address
- 1216 US HWY 67 W
Omaha, TX 75571
- Telephone
- (903) 884-2505
(make sure to verify first before calling)
- Website
- http://pewittcisd.net
- City-data.com school rating
- 26
- Students
- 198
- Classroom Teachers (FTE)
- 18.4
- Free lunch eligible students
- 87
- Reduced-price lunch
eligible students - 27
- School district
- PEWITT CISD
- Charter school
- No
- Title I status
- Title I schoolwide school
- Magnet School Indicator
- No
- Shared Time Indicator
- Missing
- Adult education offered
- No
Ratings
This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
CHAPEL HILL EL (11.3 miles): | 86 |
PEWITT H S (0.0 miles): | 66 |
CHAPEL HILL H S (11.3 miles): | 61 |
SOUTH EL (11.7 miles): | 60 |
CHAPEL HILL J H (11.3 miles): | 60 |
PEWITT EL (0.6 miles): | 49 |
DAINGERFIELD J H (10.3 miles): | 30 |
Pewitt J H School: | 26 |
DAINGERFIELD H S (11.8 miles): | 20 |
Pewitt J H School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas: | 54 |
Morris County: | 42 |
Omaha: | 47 |
Pewitt J H School: | 26 |
Students & Teachers
Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 198
Enrollment in 2015: 206
Enrollment in 2014: 204
Enrollment in 2013: 223
Enrollment in 2012: 230
Enrollment in 2011: 237
Enrollment in 2010: 220
Enrollment in 2009: 219
Enrollment in 2008: 227
Enrollment in 2007: 216
Enrollment in 2006: 218
Enrollment in 2005: 233
Enrollment in 2004: 249
Enrollment in 2003: 233
Enrollment in 2002: 240
Enrollment in 2001: 227
Enrollment in 2000: 218
Enrollment in 1999: 207
Enrollment in 2015: 206
Enrollment in 2014: 204
Enrollment in 2013: 223
Enrollment in 2012: 230
Enrollment in 2011: 237
Enrollment in 2010: 220
Enrollment in 2009: 219
Enrollment in 2008: 227
Enrollment in 2007: 216
Enrollment in 2006: 218
Enrollment in 2005: 233
Enrollment in 2004: 249
Enrollment in 2003: 233
Enrollment in 2002: 240
Enrollment in 2001: 227
Enrollment in 2000: 218
Enrollment in 1999: 207
Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)
Grade | G06 | G07 | G08 | Total |
---|---|---|---|---|
All students | 70 | 65 | 63 | 198 |
Female students | 30 | 30 | 32 | 92 |
Male students | 40 | 35 | 31 | 106 |
American Indian/Alaska Native students | - | 2 | - | 2 |
Hispanic students | 9 | 8 | 4 | 21 |
Black students | 8 | 11 | 9 | 28 |
White students | 50 | 42 | 46 | 138 |
Two or More Races students | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
Enrollment by grade:
6th grade enrollment: 70
7th grade enrollment: 65
8th grade enrollment: 63
7th grade enrollment: 65
8th grade enrollment: 63
Pewitt J H School - Historical enrollment by grade
Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
Female enrollment: 92 (46.5%)
Here: | 46.5% |
State: | 49.0% |
Male enrollment: 106 (53.5%)
School: | 53.5% |
State: | 50.1% |
Pewitt J H School - Historical enrollment by gender
Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)
American Indian/Alaska Native enrollment: 2 (1.0%)
School: | 1.0% |
State: | 0.4% |
Hispanic enrollment: 21 (10.6%)
Here: | 10.6% |
Texas: | 46.9% |
Black enrollment: 28 (14.1%)
Pewitt J H School: | 14.1% |
State: | 11.6% |
White enrollment: 138 (69.7%)
Here: | 69.7% |
State: | 32.3% |
Two or More Races enrollment: 9 (4.5%)
Pewitt J H School: | 4.5% |
State: | 2.1% |
Pewitt J H School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity
Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)
Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 114 (57.6%)
School: | 57.6% |
Texas: | 61.6% |
Free lunch eligible students: 87 (43.9%)
Here: | 43.9% |
Texas: | 55.4% |
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 27 (13.6%)
Here: | 13.6% |
State: | 6.2% |
Pewitt J H School - Lunch Program Eligibility
Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)
Classroom Teachers (FTE): 18.4
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1.7
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 0.3
Student/Teacher Ratio
Number of FTE teachers in their first year of teaching: 1.7
Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 1
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 0.3
Student/Teacher Ratio
Here: | 10.7 |
State: | 15.6 |
Pewitt J H School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio
School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $1,136,798
- Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 13.3 (Salary Expenditures: $656,890)
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $0
- Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $744,168
Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities:
Show data for
Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 8 (male: 4, female: 4)
- White: 11 (male: 7, female: 4)
- Hispanic2
- Black2
- White4
- LEP2
Students with disabilities served under Section 504
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2 (all female)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
Retention:
Show data for
(State average from 1,054 schools)
A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in 7th grade: 2 (all female)
Percent of 7th grade students retained
Total number of students retained in 8th grade: 10 (male: 4, female: 6)
Percent of 8th grade students retained
- Two or More Races: 2
Percent of 7th grade students retained
Pewitt J H School: | 3.1% |
Texas: | 6.0% |
- Black4
- White4
- Multirace2
- IDEA4
- 5042
Total number of students retained in 8th grade
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Section 504: 2 (all female)
Percent of 8th grade students retained
Pewitt J H School: | 15.9% |
State: | 7.0% |
Gifted and Talented:
Show data for
(State average from 7,254 schools)
This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
- White: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here: | 50.5 |
State: | 79.4 |
Statewide Student Assessments
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for
(State average from 3,456 schools)
The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
End-of-course (EOC)
Algebra I students tested: 22
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 22
Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 46%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%
6th Grade
Math students tested: 66
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 66
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%
Reading students tested: 66
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 66
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%
7th Grade
Math students tested: 60
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 60
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%
Reading students tested: 60
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 60
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%
Writing students tested: 60
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 61
Writing Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%
8th Grade
Math students tested: 47
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 69
Math Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%
Reading students tested: 69
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 69
Reading Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%
Science students tested: 68
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 68
Science Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%
Social Studies students tested: 68
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 68
Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%
- All4,020
- Males3,900
- Females4,104
- White4,020
Algebra I Average Scale Score
Algebra I Average Scale Score: | 4,020 |
State: | 4,001 |
Algebra I # Answer Documents Submitted: 22
Algebra I Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 7.1 (64%)
- Reporting Category 2: 7.7 (64%)
- Reporting Category 3: 8.2 (59%)
- Reporting Category 4: 6.6 (60%)
- Reporting Category 5: 3.6 (61%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 45%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 46%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 9%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,900, Tested: 9, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 67%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 11%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,104, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 61%, Masters: 8%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,020, Tested: 21, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 48%, Meets: 42%, Masters: 10%)
6th Grade
- All1,561
- Males1,570
- Females1,552
- Hispanic1,553
- Black1,513
- White1,575
- Multirace1,548
Math Average Scale Score
(6th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,561 |
State: | 1,546 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 66
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 4.5 (45%)
- Reporting Category 2: 6.4 (43%)
- Reporting Category 3: 2.1 (35%)
- Reporting Category 4: 2.7 (38%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 55%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 11%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 3%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,552, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 59%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 6%, Masters: 3%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,553, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 63%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 90%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,575, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%, Approaches: 39%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 5%)
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,548, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 80%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
- All1,545
- Males1,527
- Females1,562
- Hispanic1,513
- Black1,515
- White1,556
- Multirace1,555
Reading Average Scale Score
(6th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,545 |
State: | 1,457 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 66
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 4.4 (55%)
- Reporting Category 2: 11.4 (67%)
- Reporting Category 3: 8.1 (54%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 42%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 31%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 11%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,527, Tested: 32, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 6%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,562, Tested: 34, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 47%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 15%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,513, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,515, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 20%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,556, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 40%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 12%)
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,555, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 60%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 0%)
7th Grade
- All1,621
- Males1,619
- Females1,624
- Black1,572
- White1,634
Math Average Scale Score
(7th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,621 |
Texas: | 1,571 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 60
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 3.4 (56%)
- Reporting Category 2: 7.2 (48%)
- Reporting Category 3: 5.5 (46%)
- Reporting Category 4: 3.2 (46%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 20%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 7%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,619, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 32%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 10%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,624, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 22%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 0%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,572, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,634, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 9%)
- All1,605
- Males1,582
- Females1,658
- Black1,578
- White1,609
Reading Average Scale Score
(7th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,605 |
Texas: | 1,550 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 60
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 5.1 (64%)
- Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (61%)
- Reporting Category 3: 9 (56%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 37%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 16%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,582, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 10%, Masters: 10%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,658, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 17%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 17%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,578, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 43%, Approaches: 36%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 7%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,609, Tested: 43, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 12%)
- All3,553
- Males3,474
- Females3,711
- Black3,359
- White3,589
Writing Average Scale Score
(7th Grade)
Writing Average Scale Score: | 3,553 |
Texas: | 3,515 |
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 61
Writing Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 6.5 (41%)
- Reporting Category 2: 7.6 (58%)
- Reporting Category 3: 11 (64%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 19%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 3%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,474, Tested: 40, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 60%, Approaches: 22%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 3%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,711, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 30%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 5%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,359, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 67%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 0%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,589, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%, Approaches: 34%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 2%)
8th Grade
- All1,615
- Males1,603
- Females1,644
- Hispanic1,654
- Black1,541
- White1,621
Math Average Scale Score
(8th Grade)
Math Average Scale Score: | 1,615 |
Texas: | 1,539 |
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 69
Math Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 2.2 (55%)
- Reporting Category 2: 8 (50%)
- Reporting Category 3: 6.4 (43%)
- Reporting Category 4: 3.8 (54%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 45%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 38%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 0%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,603, Tested: 33, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 48%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 0%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,644, Tested: 14, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 35%, Meets: 29%, Masters: 0%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,654, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 38%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 50%, Masters: 0%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,541, Tested: 10, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 90%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,621, Tested: 26, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 35%, Approaches: 53%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 0%)
- All1,672
- Males1,643
- Females1,719
- Hispanic1,655
- Black1,598
- White1,693
Reading Average Scale Score
(8th Grade)
Reading Average Scale Score: | 1,672 |
State: | 1,561 |
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 69
Reading Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 5.8 (72%)
- Reporting Category 2: 13.6 (72%)
- Reporting Category 3: 11 (64%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 36%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 22%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,643, Tested: 42, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 31%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 10%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,719, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 41%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,655, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 13%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 1,598, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 36%, Approaches: 64%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,693, Tested: 47, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 23%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 30%)
- All3,695
- Males3,652
- Females3,759
- Hispanic3,666
- Black3,221
- White3,802
Science Average Scale Score
(8th Grade)
Science Average Scale Score: | 3,695 |
State: | 3,634 |
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 68
Science Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 6.1 (55%)
- Reporting Category 2: 5.4 (60%)
- Reporting Category 3: 6 (55%)
- Reporting Category 4: 7 (64%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 44%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 25%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 13%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,652, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 51%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 15%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,759, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 33%, Approaches: 37%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 11%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,666, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 25%, Approaches: 50%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 0%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,221, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 91%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,802, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 17%)
- All3,614
- Males3,561
- Females3,693
- Hispanic3,637
- Black3,248
- White3,698
Social Studies Average Scale Score
(8th Grade)
Social Studies Average Scale Score: | 3,614 |
Texas: | 3,461 |
Social Studies # Answer Documents Submitted: 68
Social Studies Avg Items Correct:
- Reporting Category 1: 9.3 (55%)
- Reporting Category 2: 5.1 (51%)
- Reporting Category 3: 5.3 (53%)
- Reporting Category 4: 4.1 (59%)
Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 46%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 28%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 14%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 12%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 3,561, Tested: 41, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 49%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 15%, Masters: 7%)
Females: (Average Scale Score: 3,693, Tested: 27, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 41%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 19%)
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 3,637, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 50%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 13%)
Black: (Average Scale Score: 3,248, Tested: 11, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 73%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 0%)
White: (Average Scale Score: 3,698, Tested: 46, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 37%, Approaches: 30%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 15%)
Health & Safety
Corporal Punishment:
Show data for
This school uses corporal punishment to discipline students
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Corporal punishment refers to paddling, spanking, or other forms of physical punishment imposed on a child.
Instances of corporal punishment (Students without disabilities): 1
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
Students without disabilities who received corporal punishment: 2 (all male)
- Black: 2
Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for
(State average from 7,090 schools)
A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.
- Hispanic2
- Black4
- White25
- Multirace2
- LEP2
- IDEA2
Chronic Student Absenteeism
- Hispanic: 2 (all female)
- Black: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- White: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
- Two or More Races: 2 (all female)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all female)
- Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here: | 166.7 |
Texas: | 159.6 |
Restraint and Seclusion:
Show data for
(State average from 2,148 schools)
Physical restraint refers to a personal restriction that immobilizes or reduces the ability of a student to move his or her torso, arms, legs, or head freely. The term physical restraint does not include a physical escort. Physical escort means a temporary touching or holding of the hand, wrist, arm, shoulder or back for the purpose of inducing a student who is acting out to walk to a safe location.
Total Number of students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint: 2 (all male)
Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
- White: 2
Students with disabilities (IDEA) subjected to physical restraint per 1,000 students
Pewitt J H School: | 10.1 |
Texas: | 6.8 |
Suspensions:
Show data for
(State average from 3,231 schools)
In-school suspension is an instance in which a child is temporarily removed from his or her regular classroom(s) for at least half a day for disciplinary purposes, but remains under the direct supervision of school personnel. Direct supervision means school personnel are physically in the same location as students under their supervision.
Students without disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 12 (male: 10, female: 2)
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension: 6 (male: 4, female: 2)
- Black: 5 (all male)
- White: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
- Hispanic2
- White4
- LEP2
- 5042
Students with disabilities receiving one or more in-school suspension
- Hispanic: 2 (all male)
- White: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
- Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 2 (all male)
- Section 504: 2 (all male)
Classes & Courses
Algebra I:
Show data for
(State average from 1,291 schools)
Algebra I is a (college-preparatory) course that includes the study of properties and operations of the real number system; evaluating rational algebraic expressions; solving and graphing first degree equations and inequalities; translating word problems into equations; operations with and factoring of polynomials; and solving simple quadratic equations. Algebra I is a foundation course leading to higher-level mathematics courses, including Geometry and Algebra II.
8th grade student enrollment in Algebra I: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- White: 13 (male: 8, female: 5)
- White: 14 (male: 7, female: 7)
Percent of 8th grade students who passed
School: | 100.0% |
Texas: | 87.0% |
Discuss Omaha, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.
Comments
Review, comment, or add new information about this topic: