|
Back to: Pima, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 47.
Address: 192 E. 200 S.
Pima, WI 85543
Grade span: 7-8
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 08:00 PM
Principal: Mr. Tony Goodman
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 485-2273
Fax: (928) 485-2274
Homepage: www.pima.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 8
- Grade 7
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 99.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| This school: | 98.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 1
Enrollment In 2003: 120
Enrollment In 2004: 116
Enrollment In 2005: 109
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 99.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 7.50
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: .00
Teacher Count In 2005: 7.50
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: .00
Teacher Count In 2006: 6.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: .00
Teacher Count In 2007: 6.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: .00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Not Evaluated
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Not Evaluated
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2004: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2004: Not Evaluated
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 8
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 56
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 13.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 11.41% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 534 schools: | 25.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 46.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 57.36% |
Female Tested: 28
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 40.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 61.28% |
Male Tested: 28
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 22.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 14.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 26.68% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 53.89% |
Hispanic Tested: 15
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 34.52% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 46.21% |
White Tested: 40
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 308 schools: | 5.80% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 383 schools: | 16.83% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 67.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 50
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 515 schools: | 23.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 62.13% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 35
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 92%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 34.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 34.77% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 45.81% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 6.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 18.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| This school: | 53.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 66.24% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 7.21% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 373 schools: | 8.84% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 23.75% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 325 schools: | 8.17% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 319 schools: | 6.95% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 344 schools: | 17.49% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
Hispanic Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 220 schools: | 2.98% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 310 schools: | 10.79% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 7.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 384 schools: | 8.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 17.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 222 schools: | 2.66% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 324 schools: | 10.61% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 59
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Female Tested: 29
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 61.61% |
Male Tested: 30
Male Percent Tested: 94%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 13
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 36.16% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 45.37% |
White Tested: 45
White Percent Tested: 94%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 16.86% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 410 schools: | 70.72% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 59
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 59
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 95%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 67.32% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 7.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 5.34% |
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 17.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 309 schools: | 5.13% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 15.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 17.48% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 5.88% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 6.84% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 7.0% | | State average from 337 schools: | 7.94% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 56
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 518 schools: | 21.77% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 527 schools: | 18.14% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 530 schools: | 47.74% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 439 schools: | 13.42% |
Female Tested: 28
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 48.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 20.03% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 19.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 49.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 13.00% |
Male Tested: 28
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 453 schools: | 23.40% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.25% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 46.44% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 11.0% | | State average from 373 schools: | 14.44% |
Hispanic Tested: 15
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 53.0% | | State average from 360 schools: | 31.69% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 360 schools: | 22.76% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 40.34% |
White Tested: 40
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 12.06% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 380 schools: | 14.04% |
White Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 47.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 55.36% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 337 schools: | 19.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 50
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 16.19% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 18.25% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 51.93% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 433 schools: | 14.94% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 35
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 92%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 32.45% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 22.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 391 schools: | 39.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 6.0% | | State average from 296 schools: | 5.94% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 13.60% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 427 schools: | 15.05% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 53.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 12.0% | | State average from 364 schools: | 19.05% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 51
All Students Percent Tested: 82%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 21.20% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 13.02% |
Female Tested: 28
Female Percent Tested: 93%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 19.66% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 468 schools: | 19.87% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 54.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 49.10% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 388 schools: | 12.71% |
Male Tested: 23
Male Percent Tested: 72%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 22.61% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 486 schools: | 17.93% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 490 schools: | 46.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 14.16% |
Hispanic Tested: 10
Hispanic Percent Tested: 77%
White Tested: 40
White Percent Tested: 83%
White Falls Below Standards
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 382 schools: | 11.00% |
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 13.95% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 55.98% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 19.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 51
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 85%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 14.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 17.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 10.0% | | State average from 470 schools: | 14.20% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 51
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 82%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 8: | 14.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 13.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 15.37% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 52.99% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 18.69% |
Grade 7
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 50
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 9.98% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 25.34% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 572 schools: | 58.10% |
Female Tested: 27
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 7: | 70.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 62.33% |
Male Tested: 23
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 28.21% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 54.12% |
Hispanic Tested: 12
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 399 schools: | 47.97% |
White Tested: 37
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Approaches Standards
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 401 schools: | 16.03% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 76.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 68.50% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 50
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 7.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 23.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 62.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 50
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 374 schools: | 5.90% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 7: | 26.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 66.24% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 7.67% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 22.45% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 378 schools: | 9.27% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 343 schools: | 6.83% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 359 schools: | 15.90% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 34.21% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 357 schools: | 12.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 8.38% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 372 schools: | 11.51% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 47
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 15.30% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 17.48% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 570 schools: | 52.46% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 15.45% |
Female Tested: 25
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 13.23% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 466 schools: | 17.55% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 64.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 54.67% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 15.76% |
Male Tested: 22
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 17.35% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 17.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 50.48% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 7: | 14.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 15.81% |
Hispanic Tested: 10
Hispanic Percent Tested: 91%
White Tested: 37
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 358 schools: | 7.25% |
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 11.96% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 68.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 57.83% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 384 schools: | 23.96% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 47
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 11.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 16.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| This school: | 60.0% | | State average from 559 schools: | 55.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 16.90% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 47
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 429 schools: | 9.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 7: | 13.0% | | State average from 448 schools: | 12.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 7: | 60.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 56.30% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 7: | 11.0% | | State average from 412 schools: | 22.49% |
|