U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Pine Meadow Elementary School in Pensacola, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Pensacola, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 73.

10001 OMAR AVE
Pensacola, FL 32534

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
T. R. Jackson Prek Center School (15.2 miles):

96
Capstone Academy School (7.6 miles):

76
Pine Meadow Elementary School:

73
S. S. Dixon Primary School (8.9 miles):

57
George S. Hallmark Elementary School (9.6 miles):

49
Blue Angels Elementary School (11.7 miles):

43
Brentwood Middle School (4.7 miles):

32
Lincoln Park Elementary School (2.5 miles):

17
Pine Meadow Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Escambia County:

41
Pensacola:

42
Pine Meadow Elementary School:

73

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Pensacola, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations


Phone: (850) 494-5630 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 17
School number: 441
School type: Elementary
District Name: ESCAMBIA
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (850) 494-7318
Principal: Patti Burke-Thomas
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 1
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 2
Senate District: 2
School Web Address: www.escambia.k12.fl.us

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

95%
State average from 963 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

95%
State average from 963 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

93%
State average from 963 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

81%
State average from 962 schools:

53%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 963 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

63%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 963 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

663
State average from 963 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 963 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 119999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

16%
State average from 963 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

33%
State average from 963 schools:

47%
Region: 2

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 379 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 379 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 113
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 366

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 370
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 366
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 259 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 259 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 254
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 252

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 254
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 252
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 63
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 70
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 70
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

95%
State average from 959 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

93%
State average from 959 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

98%
State average from 959 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

79%
State average from 959 schools:

52%
Making Reading Gains
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

78%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 959 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

75%
State average from 959 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 959 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

655
State average from 959 schools:

560
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 959 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

16%
State average from 959 schools:

54%
Minority Rate
Here:

31%
State average from 959 schools:

46%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 388 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 388 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 132
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 374
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 370

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 375
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 371
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 280 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 280 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 99
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 272
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 271

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 273
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 272
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 41 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 38
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 37
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 58 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 21
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 54
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 12
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 69 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 69 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

59%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 66
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 65

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 66
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

91%
State average from 954 schools:

74%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

92%
State average from 954 schools:

76%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

87%
State average from 954 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

66%
State average from 954 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 954 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

71%
State average from 954 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

62%
State average from 954 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 954 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

610
State average from 954 schools:

544
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 954 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: B

Grade in 2000: B

Grade in 1999: B

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

13%
State average from 954 schools:

51%
Minority Rate
Here:

29%
State average from 954 schools:

45%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 417 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 417 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 126
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 398

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 398
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 308 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 308 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 92
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 303
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 299
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 40 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 51 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 49
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 49
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

62%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 862 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

73%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

76%
State average from 862 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 862 schools:

43%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 862 schools:

70%
Making Reading Gains - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
Making Math Gains
Here:

62%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 862 schools:

66%
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading - 2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Included
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

57%
State average from 862 schools:

68%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

516
State average from 862 schools:

539
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 862 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: B

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

40%
State average from 865 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

19%
State average from 865 schools:

56%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 418 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 418 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 134
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

77%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 403
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 404
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 335 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

96%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 114
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 325
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 326
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 57
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 159 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 159 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 49
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

66%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 150
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

80%
State average from 848 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Math
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 848 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 848 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

68%
State average from 848 schools:

62%
Making Math Gains
Here:

60%
State average from 848 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

58%
State average from 848 schools:

61%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

411
State average from 848 schools:

413
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 848 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

42%
State average from 848 schools:

58%
Minority Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 848 schools:

55%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 410 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 410 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 121
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 389
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 389
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 319 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 319 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

90%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 90

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

83%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 306
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 306
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

42%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

39%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 66
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 42

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

61%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 146
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 16

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 58

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 58
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

76%
State average from 834 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

68%
State average from 834 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

74%
State average from 834 schools:

79%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

67%
State average from 834 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 834 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

422
State average from 834 schools:

412
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 834 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: B

Grade in 2002: B

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: A

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

42%
State average from 834 schools:

60%
Minority Rate
Here:

18%
State average from 832 schools:

54%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1592
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

348
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

47%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

15%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

94%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1768
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

34%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

28%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

86%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

22
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1806
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

8%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

32%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

18%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

84%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

352
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

14%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

14%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

74%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

375
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

2%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

3%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

43%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

29%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

95%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1772
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

36%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

32%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

92%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1855
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

373
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

3%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

12%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

20%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

31%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

85%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

9
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

9
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1575
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

345
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1757
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

350
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 02%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1822
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 87%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

344
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1621
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

369
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 32%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1740
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

365
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1819
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

365
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 137
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 35%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 93%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1546
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

341
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1735
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 21
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1774
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

332
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 86%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

341
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1632
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

372
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 37%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1744
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

366
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1816
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

364
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 84%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

138
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
Here:

648
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

132
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

672
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

83
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

147
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
Here:

687
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

86
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

4
State average:

190

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

5
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

3
State average:

192

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

273

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

1
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 130
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

332
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 76%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 9
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 2

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1428
State average:

1342
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1620
State average from 1875 schools:

1542
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

313
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1616
State average:

1546
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

1448
State average:

1397
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 168

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1662
State average from 1873 schools:

1629
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1661
State average:

1632
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1607
State average:

1532
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

305
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1426
State average:

1413
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1579
State average from 1874 schools:

1525
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1572
State average:

1528
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1384
State average:

1414
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 188

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1623
State average from 1872 schools:

1647
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PINE MEADOW ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:

323
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 91%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1628
State average:

1649
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1570
State average:

1519
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 58

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 144
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 1891 schools:

633
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 135
Mean Scale Score
Here:

647
State average from 1874 schools:

642
Median NPR: 65
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 140
Mean Scale Score
Here:

673
State average from 1870 schools:

667
Median NPR: 77
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 143
Mean Scale Score
Here:

631
State average from 1891 schools:

632
Median NPR: 68
Number Sense (max 14): 10
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 135
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 1874 schools:

652
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 140
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 1870 schools:

663
Median NPR: 71
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 134
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

301
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 55%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 13
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 75%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 56%

Back to: Pensacola, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.