U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Port Charlotte High School in Port Charlotte, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Port Charlotte, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 54.

18200 TOLEDO BLADE BLVD
Port Charlotte, FL 33948

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Venice Senior High School (18.4 miles):

57
Port Charlotte High School:

54
Charlotte High School (9.2 miles):

45
North Port High School (6.6 miles):

43
Venice Senior High School (18.6 miles):

40
Lemon Bay High School (11.9 miles):

36
North Port High School (6.6 miles):

35
Gulf Coast Marine Institute School (18.7 miles):

1
Port Charlotte High School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Charlotte County:

48
Port Charlotte:

49
Port Charlotte High School:

54

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA





Phone: (941) 255-7485 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 8
School number: 151
School type: Senior High
District Name: CHARLOTTE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 255-7493
Principal: Steve Dionisio
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 16
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 71
Senate District: 23

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

85%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

89%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

46%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

70%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

78%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

64%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

81%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

594
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

79%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
Here:

23%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 1

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 223 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 224 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 125
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 210
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 175 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 176 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 93
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

81%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 164
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

73%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

79%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 164
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 163
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

43%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 40
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

81%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

84%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

75%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

85%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

70%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

80%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

601
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

100%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

75%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

29%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 1


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 252 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 252 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 111
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 242
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 240
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 170 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 170 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 72
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

82%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 163
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 161
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 52 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 52 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 52
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 190 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 190 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 79
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

70%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 182
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 182
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 24

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

38%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 48
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

77%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 425 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

84%
State average from 425 schools:

82%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 425 schools:

45%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 425 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

84%
State average from 425 schools:

74%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

55%
State average from 425 schools:

55%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 425 schools:

71%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

548
State average from 425 schools:

526
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 425 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Grade in 2005: A

Grade in 2004: A

Grade in 2003: A

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

71%
State average from 425 schools:

42%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 425 schools:

44%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 237 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 237 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 103
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 214

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 223
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 215
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 173 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 173 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

78%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 155

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 162
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 156
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 46 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 46 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

55%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

41%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 162 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 162 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

87%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 70
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 146

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 152
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 147
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

51%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 42

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 43
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 43
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

52%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

79%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

89%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

40%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

74%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

60%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
11th and 12th Grade FCAT Retake Bonus Points: 0

Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

487
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: C

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

40%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

27%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1128 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1123 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 519
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1061
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

72%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1059
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 819 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 816 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

94%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 380
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

50%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 787
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

76%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 782
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 158 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 156 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 141
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

52%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 143
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 84 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 84 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

91%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 71
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 471 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 471 (97%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 208
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

36%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 435
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 437
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 20
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 188 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 187 (95%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 78
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 176
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

37%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 177
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

45%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

74%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

87%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

53%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

53%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

383
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

97%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: B

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

39%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

26%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1124 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1123 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 535
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1066
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

67%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1070
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 828 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 826 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

93%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 390

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

44%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 787
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 787
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 146 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 147 (98%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 66

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 137
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

48%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 139
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 91 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 91 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 50

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 85

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

60%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 87
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 25
Number of Students Tested in Math: 25
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 474 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 472 (97%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

92%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 217

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 442
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

63%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 444
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 201 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 198 (96%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

71%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 83

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

15%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 182
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 183
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: B
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

40%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

75%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

45%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

360
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: C

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: A

Grade in 2001: C

Grade in 2000: C

Grade in 1999: C

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

45%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

25%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1356
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

309
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

14%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

76%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

17
State average:

17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1614
State average:

1604
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

325
State average:

324
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

12%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

35%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

11%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

20
State average:

19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1817
State average:

1659
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

340
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

5%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

21%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

91%
State average:

70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

11
State average:

10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

2
State average:

2

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1856
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

10%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

35%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

79%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1917
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

338
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

16%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

75%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1987
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

331
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

9%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

29%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

8%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

70%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

18
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1978
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

322
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

16%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

33%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

29%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

12%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

51%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2026
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

66%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

32%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

12%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

43%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

16
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

347
State average:

321
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 2
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

47%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

10
State average:

9

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

17%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

34%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

7%
State average:

2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

58%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

10
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

9
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

31%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

5%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

1%
State average:

1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1370
State average:

1481
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

315
State average:

339
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

8%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

43%
State average:

32%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

27%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

4%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

73%
State average:

79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1644
State average:

1585
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

330
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

8%
State average:

10%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

9%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

37%
State average:

36%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

30%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

83%
State average:

74%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1780
State average:

1674
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

357
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

4%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

14%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

37%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

17%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

82%
State average:

63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

10
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

8
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1812
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

342
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

13%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

33%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

16%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

72%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1914
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

10%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

13%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

30%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

28%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

19%
State average:

7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

77%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

6
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1976
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

341
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

6%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

33%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

22%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

79%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

7
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

7
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1960
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

11%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

20%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

35%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

25%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

9%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

69%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2025
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

326
Percent Passing
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

88%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

7%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

30%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

42%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

6%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

78%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

7
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

8
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

6
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1389
State average:

1402
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1591
State average:

1605
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

321
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 06%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1794
State average:

1656
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 89%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1832
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

333
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1913
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1969
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1988
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1987
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 39%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

328
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1424
State average:

1476
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

338
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1610
State average:

1578
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

328
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1779
State average:

1675
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

356
State average:

334
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1829
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

346
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1907
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1956
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 22%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1982
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

319
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2007
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

329
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 114
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 80%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 393
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 86%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 453
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 27%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 68%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1345
State average:

1396
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

307
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1547
State average:

1582
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1835
State average:

1627
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

343
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1800
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 8
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1883
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

331
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1950
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1981
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

323
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 53%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1990
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

312
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

347
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

327
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1350
State average:

1461
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

311
State average:

335
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1563
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

325
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1668
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

359
State average:

333
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 85%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1792
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

337
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1908
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

336
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 79%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1952
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

335
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 25%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1968
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

315
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

2000
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

327
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 84%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

130
State average:

103
Mean Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

620
State average from 3241 schools:

633
Median NPR
Here:

50
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

115
State average:

97
Mean Scale Score
Here:

649
State average from 3233 schools:

653
Median NPR
Here:

67
State average:

69
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

10
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

14
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

8
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

102
State average:

101
Mean Scale Score
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

690
State average from 3309 schools:

667
Median NPR
Here:

87
State average:

71
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

17
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

459
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

685
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

75
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

16
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

390
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

698
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

79
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

407
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

78
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

14
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

8
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

487
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

706
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

73
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

12
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

15
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

10
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

448
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

717
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

74
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

16
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

11
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

8
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 106
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

293
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 58%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 34%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 76%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 410
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

307
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 52%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 83%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 460
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

310
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 57%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 10
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 5%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1956
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

318
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1962
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1907
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1970
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

308
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 12
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1988
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1967
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 21

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

303
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 7

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1961
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

313
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1967
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1911
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 56

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
PORT CHARLOTTE HIGH SCHOOL:

1996
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

326
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 80%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

2011
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1981
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 30

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 540
Mean Scale Score
Here:

710
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 10): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 474
Mean Scale Score
Here:

701
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 541
Mean Scale Score
Here:

722
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 79
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 9
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 7
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 9

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 474
Mean Scale Score
Here:

715
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 65
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 8
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 543
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

315
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 60%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 12
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 84%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 71%

Back to: Port Charlotte, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.