
Back to: Tampa, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 12.
3224 E CAYUGA ST
Tampa, FL 33610
Other nearby schools ratings:
Potter Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Hillsborough County:  42  Tampa:  41  Potter Elementary School:  12 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Tampa, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (813) 2765564 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 3521
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 2333693
Principal: Tracye Brown
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 11
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 59
Senate District: 18
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  41%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  54%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  89%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  11%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  52%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  52%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  48%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  64%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  411  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: D
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: F
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  98%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  98%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 240
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 239
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 245 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 244 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 68
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  37%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 216
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 219
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 215
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 273 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 74
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 245
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 240
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 244
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 239
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 41
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: D
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  56%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  65%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  16%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  64%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  61%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  61%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  61%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  475  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: C
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: F
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  99%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RatePOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  99%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 268 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 268 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 91
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 229
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 234
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 228
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 241 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 241 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 84
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 208
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 212
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 207
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 265 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 265 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 226
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 231
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 225
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 18
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  33%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 40
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  47%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  53%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  70%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  11%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  66%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  63%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  75%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  450  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: C
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: F
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  98%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  99%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 243 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 243 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 59
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 221
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 218
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 220
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 217
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 219 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 219 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 52
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 197
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 198
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 196
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 239 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 239 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 58
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 214
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 213
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 44 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 40
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 40
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 40
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  31%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  30%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  72%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  5%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  50%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  53%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  68%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  66%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  375  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: F
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: F
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  97%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  98%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 335 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 336 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 100
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 293
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 301 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 302 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 89
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 268
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 326 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 327 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 95
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 71 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 53
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: F
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  36%  State average from 643 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  37%  State average from 643 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  74%  State average from 643 schools:  81% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  53%  State average from 643 schools:  63% 
Making Math GainsHere:  59%  State average from 643 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  85%  State average from 643 schools:  61% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  344  State average from 643 schools:  420 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 643 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: F
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  96%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  99%  State average from 644 schools:  54% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 286 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 284 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 78
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 232
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 231
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 267 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 266 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 74
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 222
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 221
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 274 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 272 (99%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 73
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  30%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 220
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 219
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  7%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 43
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 44
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: C
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  38%  State average from 631 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  35%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  57%  State average from 631 schools:  80% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  48%  State average from 631 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  58%  State average from 631 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  39%  State average from 631 schools:  60% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  275  State average from 631 schools:  417 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 631 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%
Grade in 2005: F
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  93%  State average from 631 schools:  54% 
Minority RatePOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  98%  State average from 631 schools:  52% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1060  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  260  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  50%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  32% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AbovePOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  40%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1365  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  42%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  16%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  28%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  10%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  42%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1381  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  262  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  41%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  25%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1%  State average:  9% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  30%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  278  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  40%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  48%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  10%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  12%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  9 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScorePOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1257  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  19%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  54%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1469  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  16%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  28%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  13%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  56%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1549  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  30%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  30%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  41%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1156  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  276  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 43%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1465  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1407  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  267  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  266  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1364  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1506  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1494  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  296  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 30%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 104
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 8%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 93%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1165  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  278  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 50%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1355  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1407  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  267  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  255  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1341  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1404  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  288  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 44%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1472  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  291  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  111  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  608  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  625  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  644  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  11  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 64
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  272  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 41%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 69%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1076  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  263  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1293  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  270  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 26%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1307  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1173  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 134
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1311  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  250  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007POTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1306  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1221  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 84
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  236  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1120  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  261  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1325  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  270  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 89%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1335  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1212  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 122
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1431  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1417  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1270  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 147
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 113
Mean Scale ScorePOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  594  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 27
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  616  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 105
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  628  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 36
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 111
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  592  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 109
Mean Scale ScorePOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  623  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 53
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 106
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  629  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense (max 12): 7
Operations (max 12): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 109
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedPOTTER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  272  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 36%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 10
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 25%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 30%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 17%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 6%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 71%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 52%
