
Back to: Tampa, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 3.
3916 E HILLSBOROUGH AVE
Tampa, FL 33610
Other nearby schools ratings:
Quest Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Hillsborough County:  42  Tampa:  41  Quest Middle School:  3 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Tampa, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (813) 2361755 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 6631
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 2329680
Principal: Joann Shaw
Regular charter school.
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  45%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  42%  State average from 612 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 613 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  14%  State average from 612 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  59%  State average from 613 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 612 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  67%  State average from 613 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  445  State average from 613 schools:  545 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: C
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 119999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  93%  State average from 614 schools:  56% 
Minority RateQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  99%  State average from 614 schools:  49% 
Region: 5
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 96
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 95
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 53
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 24
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 29
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 91
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  42%  State average from 613 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  36%  State average from 613 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  81%  State average from 613 schools:  92% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  13%  State average from 613 schools:  49% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  58%  State average from 613 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  56%  State average from 613 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  70%  State average from 613 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  64%  State average from 613 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  420  State average from 613 schools:  553 
Percent TestedQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  99%  State average from 613 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: D
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  87%  State average from 613 schools:  52% 
Minority RateHere:  99%  State average from 613 schools:  48% 
Region: 5
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  89%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 102
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 102
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 19
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 21
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 4
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 95
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  41%  State average from 603 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  39%  State average from 603 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  81%  State average from 603 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  14%  State average from 602 schools:  46% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  57%  State average from 602 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  65%  State average from 602 schools:  71% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  63%  State average from 602 schools:  64% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  71%  State average from 602 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  431  State average from 602 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 604 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: D
Grade in 2007: D
Grade in 2006: C
Grade in 2005: C
Grade in 2004: D
Grade in 2003: C
Grade in 2002: C
Grade in 2001: D
Grade in 2000: D
Grade in 1999: D
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  87%  State average from 605 schools:  49% 
Minority RateQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  99%  State average from 605 schools:  48% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 95
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  20%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 94
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 62
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  24%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 61
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  28%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 92
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 91
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  26%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  22%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  29%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  27%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (98%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  25%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  22%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 38
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  23%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 100
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  19%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 100
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 19
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  25%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 52
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 52
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 25
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 17
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 24
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 38
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  21%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 96
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  19%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 96
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1282  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  234  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  67%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  6%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  9%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  18%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1469  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  252  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  59%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  22%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  19%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1645  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  259  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  47%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  26%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  18%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  26%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  5  State average:  6 
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  261  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  49%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  26%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  23%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  26%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1298  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  223  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  79%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  9%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  15%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1473  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  228  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  69%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  6%  State average:  31% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1673  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  264  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  53%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  24%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  29%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  3  State average:  5 
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1221  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  223  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1513  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  261  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1714  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  274  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  254  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1160  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  191  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1518  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  239  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1653  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  259  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 39
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  3  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 59%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1328  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  242  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1563  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  270  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1657  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  262  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  252  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1284  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  219  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1566  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  251  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1690  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  268  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  626  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  654  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  660  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Literary (max 18)QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  10  State average:  12 
Initial Understanding (max 12)QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  6  State average:  7 
Critical Analysis (max 12)QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  8  State average:  10 
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 38
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  229  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 50%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1313  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  240  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1295  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1215  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 80
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1587  State average from 808 schools:  1746 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  275  State average:  305 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1574  State average:  1743 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1537  State average:  1668 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 37
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1638  State average from 819 schools:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  258  State average:  294 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1658  State average:  1807 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1460  State average:  1738 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 198
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  239  State average:  290 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1266  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  215  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1317  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1308  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 8
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1605  State average from 804 schools:  1777 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  260  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1605  State average:  1774 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  1397  State average:  1645 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 208
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1652  State average from 815 schools:  1851 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  259  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1658  State average:  1845 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1446  State average:  1755 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 212
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  633  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 29
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  654  State average from 796 schools:  675 
Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale ScoreQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  655  State average from 810 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30
Mean Scale ScoreQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  624  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 20
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31
Mean Scale ScoreQUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:  647  State average from 796 schools:  685 
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  658  State average from 810 schools:  698 
Median NPR: 30
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 39
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  208  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 5%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7  Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17  Combined: 7
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 51%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 31%
