U.S. Cities - City-Data Homepage  
City-Data Forum
City-Data.com Homepage

Quest Middle School in Tampa, Florida (FL)





Jump to a detailed profile or search
site with Google Custom Search

Business Search
14 Million Businesses in
12,000 Categories
Find:
Near:

Back to: Tampa, FL, Florida, All US cities.

Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.





City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 3.

3916 E HILLSBOROUGH AVE
Tampa, FL 33610

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Terrace Community Middle School (5.9 miles):

92
Plato Academy Charter School (19.6 miles):

77
Learning Gate Community School (7.7 miles):

65
Meadowlawn Middle School (18.8 miles):

48
Madison Middle School (9.0 miles):

37
Hospital/Homebound/Homebased Programs School (1.8 miles):

21
Prince Academy School (4.0 miles):

7
Quest Middle School:

3
Quest Middle School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Hillsborough County:

42
Tampa:

41
Quest Middle School:

3

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA




Latest news about schools in Tampa, FL collected exclusively by city-data.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations


Phone: (813) 236-1755 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 6631
School type: Middle/Jr. High
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 8
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 232-9680
Principal: Joann Shaw
Regular charter school.

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

45%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

42%
State average from 612 schools:

73%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 613 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

14%
State average from 612 schools:

51%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

59%
State average from 613 schools:

64%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 612 schools:

70%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

62%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

67%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

445
State average from 613 schools:

545
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: C

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 119999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

93%
State average from 614 schools:

56%
Minority Rate
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 614 schools:

49%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

86%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 96

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 54

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

34%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 53
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 33
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

85%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 39
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

42%
State average from 613 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

36%
State average from 613 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

81%
State average from 613 schools:

92%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

13%
State average from 613 schools:

49%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

58%
State average from 613 schools:

66%
Making Math Gains
Here:

56%
State average from 613 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

70%
State average from 613 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

64%
State average from 613 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

420
State average from 613 schools:

553
Percent Tested
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

100%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: D

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 613 schools:

52%
Minority Rate
Here:

99%
State average from 613 schools:

48%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 115 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 115 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

89%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 113
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 112
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 102
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 59
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 108 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 108 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

88%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 43
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

41%
State average from 603 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

39%
State average from 603 schools:

70%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 603 schools:

88%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

14%
State average from 602 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

57%
State average from 602 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 602 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

63%
State average from 602 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

71%
State average from 602 schools:

69%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

431
State average from 602 schools:

543
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 604 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: D

Grade in 2007: D

Grade in 2006: C

Grade in 2005: C

Grade in 2004: D

Grade in 2003: C

Grade in 2002: C

Grade in 2001: D

Grade in 2000: D

Grade in 1999: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

87%
State average from 605 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

99%
State average from 605 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 95

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 109
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 94
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 75 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 33

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 62

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

24%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 61
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 109 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 109 (99%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

28%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 92

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 106
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 91
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 113 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 113 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 44
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

26%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 108
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 63 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 63 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

29%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 59
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 110 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 110 (98%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 105
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 106 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 106 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 100
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 100
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 57 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 57 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 19

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 52
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 101 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 101 (100%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

74%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 38

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 96
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 96
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1282
State average:

1716
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

67%
State average:

19%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 3
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

18%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

9
State average:

14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1469
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

59%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

22%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

9%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

19%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1645
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

259
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

47%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

16%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

5
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

49%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

26%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

7
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1298
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

79%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

6%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

9%
State average:

29%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

15%
State average:

55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

228
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

2
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1673
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

53%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

18%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

24%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

29%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1221
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

223
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1513
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1714
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

274
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 21%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1160
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

191
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 91%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1518
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 70%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1653
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 39
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 59%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1328
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 59%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 22%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1563
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

270
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1657
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1284
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 81%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1566
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

251
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1690
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

27
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

626
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
Here:

23
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

10
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

38
State average:

201
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 2487 schools:

682
Median NPR
Here:

41
State average:

66
Literary (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

12
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

5
State average:

6

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

39
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
Here:

660
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

38
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

10
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

11
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

6
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 38
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

229
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6 - Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 50%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1313
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 73%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1295
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1215
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 80

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1587
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1574
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1537
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 37

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1638
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

258
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1658
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1460
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 198

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

239
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1266
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

215
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 87%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 70%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1317
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1308
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 8

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1605
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 87%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1605
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

1397
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 208

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1652
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

259
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 95%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1658
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1446
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 212

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30
Mean Scale Score
Here:

633
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 29
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 42
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

655
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 33
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30
Mean Scale Score
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

624
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 20
Number Sense (max 10): 3
Operations (max 12): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 31
Mean Scale Score
QUEST MIDDLE SCHOOL:

647
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 34
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 30
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 39
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

208
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 5%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 28%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 51%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 31%

Back to: Tampa, FL, Florida, Florida forum, All US cities.