
Back to: Wimauma, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 21.
18240 US HWY 301 S
Wimauma, FL 33598
Other nearby schools ratings:
Rcma Wimauma Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Hillsborough County:  42  Wimauma:  40  Rcma Wimauma Academy School:  21 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Wimauma, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (813) 6725159 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 29
School number: 6615
School type: Elementary
District Name: HILLSBOROUGH
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (813) 6336119
Principal: Mark Haggett
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Year 3 in Need of Improvement
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 12
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 63
Senate District: 10
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  50%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  53%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  76%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  50%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  77%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  79%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  73%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  70%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  528  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  95%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  98%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 4
Title I: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 72 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 72 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 69
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 65
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 70 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 32
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 67
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 67
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 67
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 68 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 68 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 65
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 65
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 65
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  59%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  61%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  91%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  52%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  77%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsHere:  93%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  77%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  93%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  603  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: D
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  99%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  99%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 66 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 66 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 54 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 51
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 53 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 53 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 50
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 44
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  44%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 45 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 45 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  50%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 42
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 37 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 37 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 16
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 31
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  48%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 31
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  40%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 30
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  47%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 30
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 23
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 28
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 6
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1160  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  27%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  18%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  45%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  55%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  14  State average:  17 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  4  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1467  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  300  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  24%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  36%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  18%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  18%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  39%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  1533  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  289  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  19%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  19%  State average:  28% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  56%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  304  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  19%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  38%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  44%  State average:  36% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  44%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1225  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  284  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  50%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  32%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  41%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1451  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  299  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  12%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  36%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  52%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1701  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  38%  State average:  28% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  69%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  8  State average:  8 
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  6  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1197  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  283  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1190  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  253  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 07%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 07%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 04
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 09
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 07
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 02
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  1669  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 88%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 94%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1262  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  292  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1353  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  277  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1671  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  333  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 53%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 7%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 60%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1087  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  265  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 38%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1353  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1515  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  286  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  1035  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  243  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1371  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  281  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 41%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1565  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  311  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 54%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  24  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  602  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Informational (max 18)RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  11  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  7  State average:  9 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  630  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPRRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  50  State average:  69 
Functional (max 18)RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  12  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  658  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Median NPRRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  65  State average:  71 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 17
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  221  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 65%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 18%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 18%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 9
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 41%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 18%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 24%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1117  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  270  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 45%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1396  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  288  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 33%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1396  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  983  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 413
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1793  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 62%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007RCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  1780  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1395  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 385
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 62%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 62%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1286  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  297  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1412  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  290  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 40%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 100%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1412  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1216  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 195
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1686  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1686  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1418  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 268
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale ScoreRCMA WIMAUMA ACADEMY:  598  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 31
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 10
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 7
Strategies (max 10): 4
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  618  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 39
Literary (max 18): 9
Informational (max 18): 11
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 8
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 12): 5
Strategies (max 10): 5
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  676  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 79
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 20
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  594  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 37
Number Sense (max 14): 8
Operations (max 11): 6
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 15
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  628  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense (max 12): 8
Operations (max 12): 7
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 13
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  679  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 15
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  241  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 60%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 13%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 13%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 33%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 13%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 47%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 13%
