|
Back to: Teec Nos Pos, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 20.
Address: Hwy 160 Milepost 448
Teec Nos Pos, WI 86514
Grade span: 6-8
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 05:00 PM
Principal: Mr. Bob Debus
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 656-4141
Fax: (928) 656-4106
Homepage: www.redmesa.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 8
- Grade 6
- Grade 7
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: | 22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 90.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 4
Enrollment In 2002: 195
Enrollment In 2003: 210
Enrollment In 2004: 197
Enrollment In 2005: 205
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Here: | 99.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 90.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 88.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 11.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 3.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 11.50
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 3.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 15.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 2.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 13.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 3.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: No
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 8
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 65
All Students Percent Tested: 90%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 59.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.74% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 21.13% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 39.95% |
Female Tested: 34
Female Percent Tested: 87%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 21.97% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 399 schools: | 42.48% |
Male Tested: 31
Male Percent Tested: 94%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 28.33% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 20.48% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 10.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 37.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 62
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 91%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 23.55% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 21.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 40.71% |
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 21.13% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 74
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 83.0% | | State average from 511 schools: | 32.52% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 18.95% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 505 schools: | 34.30% |
Female Tested: 39
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 28.98% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 432 schools: | 19.82% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 36.30% |
Male Tested: 35
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 88.0% | | State average from 447 schools: | 35.90% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 433 schools: | 18.14% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 72
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 82.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 28.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 19.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 36.41% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 51
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 77.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 47.34% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 362 schools: | 20.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 26.22% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 23
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 430 schools: | 23.06% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 84
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 29.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Female Tested: 34
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 61.61% |
Male Tested: 49
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 73
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 84
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 67.32% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 6.84% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 64
All Students Percent Tested: 89%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 87.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 38.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 41.22% |
Female Tested: 33
Female Percent Tested: 85%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 88.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 38.00% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 401 schools: | 42.77% |
Male Tested: 31
Male Percent Tested: 94%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 87.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 37.74% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 13.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 39.95% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 61
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 90%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 87.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 36.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 41.83% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 74
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 83.0% | | State average from 508 schools: | 37.65% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 507 schools: | 36.60% |
Female Tested: 39
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 441 schools: | 36.01% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 38.49% |
Male Tested: 35
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 100.0% | | State average from 438 schools: | 39.01% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 72
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 82.0% | | State average from 492 schools: | 34.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 495 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 51
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 85.0% | | State average from 370 schools: | 52.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 367 schools: | 33.45% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 23
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 80.0% | | State average from 427 schools: | 27.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 434 schools: | 38.55% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 84
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 550 schools: | 21.20% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 555 schools: | 18.93% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 47.62% |
Female Tested: 34
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 454 schools: | 19.66% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 468 schools: | 19.87% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 32.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 49.10% |
Male Tested: 49
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 22.61% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Grade 8: | 29.0% | | State average from 486 schools: | 17.93% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 490 schools: | 46.56% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 73
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 526 schools: | 17.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 19.04% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 551 schools: | 50.60% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 84
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 13.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 15.37% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 52.99% |
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 68
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
Female Tested: 32
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 6: | 3.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 9.26% |
Female Approaches Standards
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 23.38% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 38.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 63.79% |
Male Tested: 33
Male Percent Tested: 92%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 715 schools: | 27.02% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 57.22% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 59
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 6: | 58.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 23.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 36.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 64.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 68
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 6.14% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 6: | 54.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 17.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 70.84% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 68
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 727 schools: | 16.52% |
Female Tested: 32
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 16.96% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Grade 6: | 25.0% | | State average from 688 schools: | 20.37% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 47.76% |
Male Tested: 33
Male Percent Tested: 92%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 21.36% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 18.94% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 44.63% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 641 schools: | 16.97% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 59
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 14.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 6: | 41.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 19.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 49.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 2.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 18.22% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 68
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 11.16% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Grade 6: | 35.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 14.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 50.64% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 1.0% | | State average from 598 schools: | 24.65% |
Grade 7
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 59
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 9.98% |
All Students Approaches Standards
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 25.34% |
All Students Meets Standards
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 572 schools: | 58.10% |
Female Tested: 21
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 62.33% |
Male Tested: 38
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 436 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Approaches Standards
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 28.21% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 54.12% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 50
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 7.29% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 23.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 560 schools: | 62.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 59
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 374 schools: | 5.90% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 451 schools: | 17.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 66.24% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 467 schools: | 22.45% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 59
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 15.30% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 42.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 17.48% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 570 schools: | 52.46% |
Female Tested: 21
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 13.23% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 466 schools: | 17.55% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 54.67% |
Male Tested: 38
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 17.35% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 17.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 50.48% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 50
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 11.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Grade 7: | 42.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 16.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 7: | 46.0% | | State average from 559 schools: | 55.69% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 59
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Grade 7: | 19.0% | | State average from 429 schools: | 9.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 448 schools: | 12.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 56.30% |
|