Richard Milburn Academy School in Bradenton, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 1.

6210 - 17TH AVE W
Bradenton, FL 34209

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Coastal Behavioral Healthcare Residential Treatment Center School (11.6 miles):

92
Juvenile Detention Center School (3.5 miles):

66
Southeast High School (4.9 miles):

39
Gibbs High School (19.4 miles):

35
Hamilton Disston School (19.6 miles):

29
Extended Transition At Ptec Clearwater School (19.4 miles):

17
Triad School (15.8 miles):

6
Richard Milburn Academy School:

1
Richard Milburn Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Manatee County:

42
Bradenton:

45
Richard Milburn Academy School:

1

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:



Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (941) 761-4393 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 41
School number: 2107
School type: Senior High
District Name: MANATEE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (941) 761-2991
Principal: Krista Morton
Regular charter school.
School in Need of Improvement (SINI) Status: Title 1 school not in need of improvement
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 68
Senate District: 21

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 51 (91%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 44 (80%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

68%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 40
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 32 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 28 (85%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (56%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (54%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 20
Number of Students Tested in Math: 18
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16 (52%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16 (50%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13 (29%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13 (29%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (67%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (65%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16 (53%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15 (48%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 42 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 41 (74%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

25%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 11
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 58 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 54 (77%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

75%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 16
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 25
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 16
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27 (90%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26 (87%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

15%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

17%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

43%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

20%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

176
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

53%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: NO

Grade in 2006: P

Charter: YES

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

28%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

68%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (64%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (64%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

65%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 23
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 41
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

14%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 42
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 17
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 10
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 31 (58%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 32 (59%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 28 (72%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27 (71%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 7
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

1585
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

69%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

28%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

3%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

7
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

1542
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

17%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

78%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

22%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

10
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

74%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

4
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1691
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

233
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

68%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

26%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

3%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

6%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

2
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

2
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1801
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

279
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

47%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

41%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

24%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

18%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

35%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1661
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

264
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1534
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

227
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1791
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1758
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

268
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 54%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 31
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

2
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 6%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 23%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1649
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

262
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

1600
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 89%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1721
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 63%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

1798
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

278
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

22
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

664
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

32
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

8
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

12
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

34
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

7
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

229
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 5%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1673
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

266
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 66%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 3%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 53%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1704
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1649
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 55

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1625
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 48%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1538
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1685
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -147

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

297
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

262
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 77%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1798
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 53%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

1797
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1715
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 81

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1827
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

285
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 28%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 67%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1816
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1812
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 35
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 38
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 12
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Here:

677
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 36
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 35
Mean Scale Score
RICHARD MILBURN ACADEMY:

688
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 52
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 6

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 45
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 25
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

224
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 72%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 4%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 32%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 24%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 44%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 20%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2020 Advameg, Inc.