
Back to: Middleburg, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 62.
3065 APALACHICOLA BLVD
Middleburg, FL 32068
Other nearby schools ratings:
Rideout Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Clay County:  54  Middleburg:  48  Rideout Elementary School:  62 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Middleburg, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (904) 2915430 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 10
School number: 541
School type: Elementary
District Name: CLAY
Grade range: PREKINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 6
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (904) 2915434
Principal: Laura Johnson
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 6
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 13
Senate District: 5
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  79%  State average from 68 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  72%  State average from 68 schools:  79% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  93%  State average from 68 schools:  86% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  53%  State average from 68 schools:  55% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  69%  State average from 68 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  71%  State average from 68 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  68%  State average from 68 schools:  59% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  72%  State average from 68 schools:  65% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  577  State average from 68 schools:  549 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 68 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 119999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  43%  State average from 68 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  48%  State average from 68 schools:  46% 
Region: 2
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1092 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1092 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 362
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  73%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1048
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 990
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1047
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 987
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 574 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 210
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 560
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 534
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 559
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 532
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 23
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 72
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 72
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 303 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 303 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 90
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 264
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 286
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 264
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 37
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 41
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 37
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 469 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 469 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  91%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 150
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  63%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 442
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 417
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 441
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 414
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 59 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 52
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 51
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 145 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 145 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 47
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  42%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 137
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 126
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  35%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 136
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 123
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  77%  State average from 68 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  74%  State average from 68 schools:  78% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  95%  State average from 68 schools:  90% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  57%  State average from 68 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  70%  State average from 68 schools:  68% 
Making Math GainsRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  73%  State average from 68 schools:  69% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  76%  State average from 68 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  68%  State average from 68 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  590  State average from 68 schools:  561 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 68 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  39%  State average from 68 schools:  54% 
Minority RateHere:  47%  State average from 68 schools:  46% 
Region: 3
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1169 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1170 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 391
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1093
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1031
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  69%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1092
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1031
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 621 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 622 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 196
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 564
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 593
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 564
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 83 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 83 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 70
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 76
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 70
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 323 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 323 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 119
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  61%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 265
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 284
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 266
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 46
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 458 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 458 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 155
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  60%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 409
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 386
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 407
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 385
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 77 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 56
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 156 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 54
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  36%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 136
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  32%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 144
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 136
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  74%  State average from 65 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  74%  State average from 65 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  91%  State average from 65 schools:  84% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  58%  State average from 65 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  66%  State average from 65 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  75%  State average from 65 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  68%  State average from 65 schools:  59% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  65%  State average from 65 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  571  State average from 65 schools:  536 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 65 schools:  99% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: YES
Grade in 2008: A
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: A
Grade in 2001: C
Grade in 2000: B
Grade in 1999: B
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  36%  State average from 65 schools:  52% 
Minority RateHere:  45%  State average from 65 schools:  46% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1131 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1131 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 350
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1068
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 996
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1071
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 997
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 625 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 625 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 187
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 604
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 569
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 606
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 571
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 103 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  93%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 41
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 82
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 91
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 81
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 271 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 271 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 73
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 249
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 228
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  54%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 250
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 228
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 49 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 49 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 46
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 42
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 406 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 406 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 121
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  49%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 366
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 337
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  51%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 367
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 336
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 76 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 76 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 26
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 59
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 157 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 157 (99%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  34%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 145
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 131
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  31%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 148
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 134
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  83%  State average from 60 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  72%  State average from 60 schools:  70% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  76%  State average from 60 schools:  84% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  53%  State average from 60 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  74%  State average from 60 schools:  69% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  62%  State average from 60 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  71%  State average from 60 schools:  66% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  62%  State average from 60 schools:  65% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  553  State average from 60 schools:  538 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 60 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2006: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  30%  State average from 60 schools:  55% 
Minority RateHere:  24%  State average from 60 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 596 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 596 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 146
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  77%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 573
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  68%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 573
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 451 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 451 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 117
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  79%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 436
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 435
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 50 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 50 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 65 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 65 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 62
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 174 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 174 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  76%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 42
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 166
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  57%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 165
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 2
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 27
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  53%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  52%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 92
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20052006 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  79%  State average from 61 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  67%  State average from 61 schools:  69% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  81%  State average from 61 schools:  83% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  64%  State average from 61 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  60%  State average from 61 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  70%  State average from 61 schools:  64% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  421  State average from 61 schools:  421 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 61 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES
Grade in 2006: A
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  28%  State average from 61 schools:  55% 
Minority RateHere:  23%  State average from 61 schools:  54% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20052006
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 575 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 574 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  95%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 118
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  74%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 544
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  62%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 546
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 440 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 439 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  96%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 92
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  78%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 420
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  65%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 421
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 54
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 55
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  59%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 44
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  55%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 44
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 15
Number of Students Tested in Math: 15
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 152 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 151 (100%)
Writing Performance  Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 36
Performance  Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  56%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 142
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  45%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 143
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 3
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
AYP 20052006  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 98 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (99%)
Writing Performance  Number with Scores: 16
Reading Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  46%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency  Number with Scores: 90
 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency  Percent ProficientHere:  38%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency  Number with Scores: 91
 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
SchoolWide Measures 2006 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: PRO
20042005 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  76%  State average from 59 schools:  71% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  72%  State average from 59 schools:  66% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  89%  State average from 59 schools:  85% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  62%  State average from 59 schools:  66% 
Making Math GainsHere:  56%  State average from 59 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  57%  State average from 59 schools:  62% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 ColumnsHere:  412  State average from 59 schools:  418 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 59 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: Yes%
Grade in 2005: A
Grade in 2004: A
Grade in 2003: A
Grade in 2002: N
Charter: NO
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  26%  State average from 59 schools:  56% 
Minority RateHere:  20%  State average from 59 schools:  54% 
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1363  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  17%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  14%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  32%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1580  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  31%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  71%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1642  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  309  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  3  State average:  3 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  2  State average:  2 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1757  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  36%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  28%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  14  State average:  14 
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1911  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  337  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  31%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  81%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1932  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  308 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  25%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  22%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  62%  State average:  52% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average:  4 
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1968  State average:  1922 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  28%  State average:  30% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  43%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  12% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  57%  State average:  45% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1941  State average:  1938 
Mean Scale Score 100500RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  303  State average:  302 
Percent PassingHere:  48%  State average:  56% 
% in each Achievement Level 1RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  39%  State average:  35% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  35%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  11%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  25%  State average:  37% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  15%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  39%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  11%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  3%  State average:  4% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  46%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  21%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  47%  State average:  41% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1332  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  307  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  20%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  36%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  24%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  5%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  65%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1555  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  13%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  16%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  38%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  26%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  71%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1657  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  28%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  21%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  61%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1666  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  308  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  26%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  21%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  31%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  19%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  53%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  6 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1845  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  14%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  19%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  35%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  25%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  68%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1932  State average:  1892 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  12%  State average:  15% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  15%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  38% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  21%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  17%  State average:  10% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  73%  State average:  64% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1933  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  305  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  7%  State average:  17% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  29%  State average:  22% 
% in each Achievement Level 3RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  47%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  14%  State average:  21% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  64%  State average:  61% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1987  State average:  1995 
Mean Scale Score 100500RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  324  State average:  326 
Percent PassingHere:  85%  State average:  80% 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  21%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  41%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  29%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  70%  State average:  69% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1379  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  313  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1605  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 05
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1694  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1789  State average:  1707 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  310 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1840  State average:  1800 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  323  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1916  State average:  1864 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1946  State average:  1907 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 46%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 51%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  236  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1342  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1588  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1695  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  339  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1740  State average:  1679 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  325  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1842  State average:  1799 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1920  State average:  1876 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1927  State average:  1925 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  303  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 66%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 124
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Unscore  Combined: 1
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 47%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 2%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 86%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 410
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 9%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 89%
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1364  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  311  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 73%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1583  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  320  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1646  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  309  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 10
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1742  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  317  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1829  State average:  1775 
Mean Scale Score 100500RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  321  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1909  State average:  1857 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  315  State average:  304 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 60%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1965  State average:  1894 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  316  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 45%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 52%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  274  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1347  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  310  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 59%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1590  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1682  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1717  State average:  1670 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  320  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1821  State average:  1801 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  314  State average:  309 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 65%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1931  State average:  1882 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  329  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1954  State average:  1915 
Mean Scale Score 100500RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  311  State average:  299 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 68%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  125  State average:  103 
Mean Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  630  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Literary (max 18)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  12  State average:  13 
Informational (max 18)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  13  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  656  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  130  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  672  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  9  State average:  9 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of StudentsRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  363  State average:  190 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  677  State average from 2604 schools:  671 
Initial Understanding (max 12)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  8  State average:  8 
Interpretation (max 20)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  15  State average:  14 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  392  State average:  201 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  687  State average from 2487 schools:  682 
Median NPRRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  71  State average:  66 
Initial Understanding (max 12)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  368  State average:  192 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  693  State average from 2497 schools:  687 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of StudentsHere:  146  State average:  273 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  698  State average from 2275 schools:  694 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  10  State average:  9 
Strategies (max 10)RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  6  State average:  5 
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 113
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  299  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 19%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 38%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 72%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 372
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  302  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 56%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 11
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 29%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 7%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 86%
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 5
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1431  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 43%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1605  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  324  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 90%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1613  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1456  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 157
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1659  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1682  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006RIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  1594  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 89
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1752  State average from 878 schools:  1661 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  319  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 14
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1759  State average:  1663 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1631  State average:  1592 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 127
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  321  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1501  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1535  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  318  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 71%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 92%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1540  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1469  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 72
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1694  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  338  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 67%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 6
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1706  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1545  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 161
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1683  State average from 873 schools:  1641 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  312  State average:  302 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 49%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 5
Percent Matched to 2006: 93%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1693  State average:  1645 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1615  State average:  1620 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 78
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 166
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  645  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 71
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 154
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  651  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 69
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 118
Mean Scale ScoreRIDEOUT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL:  672  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 161
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  684  State average from 874 schools:  671 
Median NPR: 75
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 13
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 15
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 166
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  638  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 73
Number Sense (max 14): 11
Operations (max 11): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 154
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  656  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 78
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 118
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  669  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 77
Number Sense (max 12): 9
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 161
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  674  State average from 874 schools:  669 
Median NPR: 69
Number Sense (max 10): 6
Operations (max 12): 8
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 152
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  291  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 10%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 59%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 13
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 16%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 72%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 55%
