Jump to a detailed profile or search site with Google Custom Search


River Ridge Elementary School in Austin, TX
(PK-05 • Public • Regular School)

City-data.com school rating (using weighted test average as compared to other schools in Texas) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 99
Address
 12900 TIERRA GRANDE TRL
Austin, TX 78732
Telephone
(512) 570-7300
(make sure to verify first before calling)
City-data.com school rating
99
Students
784
Classroom Teachers (FTE)
48.6
Free lunch eligible students
10
Reduced-price lunch
eligible students
3
School district
LEANDER ISD
Charter school
No
Title I status
Not a Title I school
Magnet School Indicator
No
Shared Time Indicator
Missing
Adult education offered
No

Ratings

This school rating compared to other nearby schools ratings:
BARTON CREEK EL (3.5 miles):

100
CANYON RIDGE MIDDLE (1.6 miles):

99
LAURA WELCH BUSH EL (1.7 miles):

99
HUDSON BEND MIDDLE (3.3 miles):

99
River Ridge Elementary School:

99
LAKE POINTE EL (2.5 miles):

98
STEINER RANCH EL (3.0 miles):

98
WEST RIDGE MIDDLE (3.5 miles):

98
LAKE TRAVIS EL (2.4 miles):

45
River Ridge Elementary School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Texas:

54
Travis County:

57
Austin:

57
River Ridge Elementary School:

99

Students & Teachers


Total enrollment:
Enrollment in 2016: 784
Enrollment in 2015: 815
Enrollment in 2014: 958
Enrollment in 2013: 872
Enrollment in 2012: 793
Enrollment in 2011: 669
Enrollment in 2010: 509

River Ridge Elementary School - Historical enrollment


Enrollment by grade, gender and race:
(Note: Details may not add to totals. School year: 2015-2016)

GradePKKGG01G02G03G04G05Total
All students694127132135135155784
Female students1436569576574374
Male students5516263787081410
Asian students18142014162699
Hispanic students - 1291518141684
Black students - - 1 - - 214
White students56797929796108562
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander students - 1 - - - - - 1
Two or More Races students - 66567434

Enrollment by grade:
Pre-Kindergarten enrollment: 6
Kindergarten enrollment: 94
1st grade enrollment: 127
2nd grade enrollment: 132
3rd grade enrollment: 135
4th grade enrollment: 135
5th grade enrollment: 155

River Ridge Elementary School - Historical enrollment by grade


Enrollment by gender:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Female enrollment: 374 (47.7%)
Here:

47.7%
Texas:

49.0%
Male enrollment: 410 (52.3%)
River Ridge Elementary School:

52.3%
Texas:

50.1%

River Ridge Elementary School - Historical enrollment by gender


Enrollment by race/ethnicity:
(State average from 9,864 schools)

Asian enrollment: 99 (12.6%)
Here:

12.6%
State:

3.1%
Hispanic enrollment: 84 (10.7%)
Here:

10.7%
State:

46.9%
Black enrollment: 4 (0.5%)
School:

0.5%
Texas:

11.6%
White enrollment: 562 (71.7%)
River Ridge Elementary School:

71.7%
State:

32.3%
Hawaiian Native/Pacific Islander enrollment: 1 (0.1%)
School:

0.1%
Texas:

0.1%
Two or More Races enrollment: 34 (4.3%)
River Ridge Elementary School:

4.3%
Texas:

2.1%

River Ridge Elementary School - Historical enrollment by race/ethnicity


Lunch Program Eligibility:
(State average from 8,545 schools)

Free/reduced-price lunch eligible students: 13 (1.7%)
School:

1.7%
State:

61.6%
Free lunch eligible students: 10 (1.3%)
Here:

1.3%
State:

55.4%
Reduced-price lunch eligible students: 3 (0.4%)
Here:

0.4%
State:

6.2%

River Ridge Elementary School - Lunch Program Eligibility


Teachers and support:
(State average from 9,601 schools)

Classroom Teachers (FTE): 48.6

Number of FTE teachers in their second year of teaching: 0.3
Number of FTE school counselors: 1
Number of FTE nurses: 1
Number of FTE psychologists: 0.3

Student/Teacher Ratio
Here:

16.1
State:

15.6

River Ridge Elementary School - Teachers (FTE) and pupil/teacher ratio


School Expenditures:
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,440,190
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Teachers: 42.4 (Salary Expenditures: $2,083,216)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 1.4 (Salary Expenditures: $32,184)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5 (Salary Expenditures: $181,752)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $143,038)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with State and Local Funds: $2,408,006
Salary Expenditures for Total Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds,: $2,934,645
  • Salary Expenditures for Teachers: $2,373,576
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Instructional Aides: 7.2 (Salary Expenditures: $156,935)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of Support Services Staff: 5.3 (Salary Expenditures: $261,096)
  • Full-time Equivalency Count of School Administration Staff: 2 (Salary Expenditures: $143,038)
Salary Expenditures for Non-Personnel Funded with Federal, State, and Local Funds: $2,763,049

Limited English Proficiency:
Show data for

    Students Enrolled in LEP Programs

  • Hispanic10
  • Asian4
  • White5
  • IDEA4
Students Enrolled in LEP Programs: 19 (male: 7, female: 12)
  • Hispanic: 10 (male: 5, female: 5)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 5 (all female)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 4 (male: 2, female: 2)

Students with disabilities:
Show data for

Students with Disabilities (IDEA): Students with intellectual disabilities; hearing impairment, including deafness; speech or language impairment; visual impairment, including blindness; serious emotional disturbance; orthopedic impairment; autism; traumatic brain injury; developmental delay; other health impairment; specific learning disability; deaf-blindness; or multiple disabilities and who, by reason thereof, receive special education and related services under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) according to an Individualized Education Program, Individual Family Service Plan, or service plan. The "Students with Disabilities (IDEA)" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive special education and related services under IDEA.

Students with Disabilities (Section 504 only): Students with a disability, who receive related aids and services solely under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). The "Section 504 only" column in the survey items always refers to students with disabilities who receive related aids and services under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, and not under IDEA.

    Students with disabilities served under IDEA

  • Hispanic7
  • Asian4
  • White50
  • LEP4
Students with disabilities served under IDEA: 61 (male: 54, female: 7)
  • Hispanic: 7 (all male)
  • Asian: 4 (all male)
  • White: 50 (male: 43, female: 7)
  • Limited English Proficiency (LEP): 4 (all male)

Students with disabilities served under Section 504: 34 (male: 21, female: 13)
  • Hispanic: 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • White: 25 (male: 14, female: 11)
  • Two or More Races: 2 (all male)

Retention:
Show data for

(State average from 2,613 schools)

A student is retained if he or she is not promoted to the next grade prior to the beginning of the following school year. Students are not considered retained if they can proceed to the next grade because they successfully completed a summer school program or for a similar reason. At the high school level, a student who has not accumulated enough credits to be classified as being in the next grade is considered retained
Total number of students retained in Kindergarten: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2

Percent of Kindergarten students retained
River Ridge Elementary School:

2.1%
State:

5.2%

Total number of students retained in 5th grade: 2 (all male)
  • White: 2

Percent of 5th grade students retained
River Ridge Elementary School:

1.3%
State:

4.3%


Gifted and Talented:
Show data for

(State average from 7,254 schools)

This school has students enrolled in one or more gifted/talented programs
Gifted/talented programs are programs during regular school hours that provide special educational opportunities including accelerated promotion through grades and classes and an enriched curriculum for students who are endowed with a high degree of mental ability or who demonstrate unusual physical coordination, creativity, interest, or talent.

    Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment

  • Hispanic25
  • Asian52
  • Black2
  • White148
  • Multirace16
  • IDEA2
Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment: 243 (male: 116, female: 127)
  • Hispanic: 25 (male: 8, female: 17)
  • Asian: 52 (male: 26, female: 26)
  • Black: 2 (all female)
  • White: 148 (male: 74, female: 74)
  • Two or More Races: 16 (male: 8, female: 8)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 2 (all male)

Gifted and Talented Student Enrollment per 1,000 students
Here:

309.9
Texas:

79.4

Statewide Student Assessments


State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness:
Show data for

(State average from 4,539 schools)

The State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness, or STAAR, is the state testing program that was implemented in the 2011-2012 school year. The Texas Education Agency (TEA), in collaboration with the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) and Texas educators, developed the STAAR program in response to requirements set forth by the 80th and 81st Texas legislatures. STAAR is an assessment program designed to measure the extent to which students have learned and are able to apply the knowledge and skills defined in the state - mandated curriculum standards, the Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills (TEKS). Every STAAR question is directly aligned to the TEKS currently implemented for the grade / subject or course being assessed. The STAAR program includes STAAR and STAAR Spanish.
3rd Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,589
  • Males1,607
  • Females1,570
  • Hispanic1,524
  • Asian1,635
  • White1,591
  • Multirace1,616
Math Average Scale Score:

1,589
State:

1,453
Math students tested: 140
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 140

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 10.9 (84%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.4 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.3 (83%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 16%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 29%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 52%

3%
16%
29%
52%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,607, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 54%)
15%
31%
54%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,570, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 16%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 50%)
6%
16%
28%
50%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,524, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 38%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 31%)
38%
31%
31%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,635, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 37%, Masters: 63%)
37%
63%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,591, Tested: 102, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 54%)
4%
15%
27%
54%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,616, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 57%)
43%
57%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (3rd Grade)

  • All1,556
  • Males1,545
  • Females1,567
  • Hispanic1,480
  • Asian1,526
  • White1,567
  • Multirace1,614
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,556
State:

1,423
Reading students tested: 140
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 140

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (94%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 11.9 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 11.2 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 27%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 18%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 51%

4%
27%
18%
51%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,545, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 33%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 44%)
3%
33%
20%
44%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,567, Tested: 68, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 59%)
4%
21%
16%
59%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,480, Tested: 13, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 16%, Masters: 38%)
15%
31%
16%
38%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,526, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 50%)
25%
25%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,567, Tested: 102, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 17%, Masters: 54%)
3%
26%
17%
54%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,614, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 57%)
29%
14%
57%

4th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,636
  • Males1,663
  • Females1,612
  • Hispanic1,642
  • Asian1,744
  • White1,611
  • Multirace1,671
Math Average Scale Score:

1,636
State:

1,546
Math students tested: 132
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 138

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.1 (79%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 8.2 (74%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.7 (77%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 2.8 (71%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 24%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 17%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 48%

11%
24%
17%
48%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,663, Tested: 61, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 15%, Meets: 13%, Masters: 59%)
13%
15%
13%
59%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,612, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 10%, Approaches: 31%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 38%)
10%
31%
21%
38%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,642, Tested: 15, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
13%
27%
20%
40%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,744, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 5%, Meets: 11%, Masters: 78%)
6%
5%
11%
78%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,611, Tested: 93, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 18%, Masters: 43%)
13%
26%
18%
43%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,671, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 40%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 40%)
40%
20%
40%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All1,623
  • Males1,622
  • Females1,623
  • Hispanic1,645
  • Asian1,675
  • White1,604
  • Multirace1,665
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,623
Texas:

1,496
Reading students tested: 138
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 138

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 6.4 (81%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 12.3 (82%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 10.3 (79%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 23%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 26%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 46%

5%
23%
26%
46%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,622, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 24%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 45%)
5%
24%
26%
45%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,623, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 20%, Meets: 28%, Masters: 46%)
6%
20%
28%
46%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,645, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 50%)
13%
7%
31%
50%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,675, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 13%, Meets: 32%, Masters: 50%)
5%
13%
32%
50%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,604, Tested: 94, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 29%, Meets: 26%, Masters: 41%)
4%
29%
26%
41%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,665, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 20%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%

    Writing Average Scale Score
    (4th Grade)

  • All4,209
  • Males4,246
  • Females4,175
  • Hispanic4,417
  • Asian4,406
  • White4,111
  • Multirace4,439
Writing Average Scale Score:

4,209
Texas:

3,570
Writing students tested: 138
Writing # Answer Documents Submitted: 138

Writing Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 4.7 (59%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 5.7 (71%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12.9 (80%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 11%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 22%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 39%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 28%

11%
22%
39%
28%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,246, Tested: 66, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 15%, Approaches: 17%, Meets: 33%, Masters: 35%)
15%
17%
33%
35%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,175, Tested: 72, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 7%, Approaches: 28%, Meets: 44%, Masters: 21%)
7%
28%
44%
21%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,417, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 25%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 44%)
25%
31%
44%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,406, Tested: 22, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 9%, Approaches: 9%, Meets: 41%, Masters: 41%)
9%
9%
41%
41%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,111, Tested: 94, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 26%, Meets: 43%, Masters: 18%)
13%
26%
43%
18%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,439, Tested: 5, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 20%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 80%)
20%
80%

5th Grade

    Math Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,808
  • Males1,807
  • Females1,808
  • Hispanic1,750
  • Asian1,917
  • White1,801
  • Multirace1,807
Math Average Scale Score:

1,808
State:

1,603
Math students tested: 128
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 137

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 15.1 (89%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 7.9 (87%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 3.6 (91%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 1%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 21%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 77%

1%
1%
21%
77%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,807, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 3%, Meets: 21%, Masters: 76%)
3%
21%
76%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,808, Tested: 58, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 19%, Masters: 79%)
2%
19%
79%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,750, Tested: 20, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 10%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 65%)
10%
25%
65%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,917, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,801, Tested: 85, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 24%, Masters: 75%)
1%
24%
75%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,807, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 14%, Masters: 86%)
14%
86%

    Reading Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All1,737
  • Males1,726
  • Females1,750
  • Hispanic1,699
  • Asian1,783
  • White1,735
  • Multirace1,755
Reading Average Scale Score:

1,737
Texas:

1,546
Reading students tested: 129
# Absent - Not Tested: 2
Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 137

Reading Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 7.2 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.4 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 12 (86%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 2%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 4%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 24%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 70%

2%
4%
24%
70%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,726, Tested: 70, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 6%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 66%)
3%
6%
25%
66%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 1,750, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 3%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 75%)
3%
22%
75%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 1,699, Tested: 18, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 6%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 56%)
6%
38%
56%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 1,783, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 75%)
25%
75%
White: (Average Scale Score: 1,735, Tested: 87, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 1%, Approaches: 7%, Meets: 22%, Masters: 70%)
1%
7%
22%
70%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 1,755, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 12%, Masters: 88%)
12%
88%

    Science Average Scale Score
    (5th Grade)

  • All4,323
  • Males4,318
  • Females4,328
  • Hispanic4,096
  • Asian4,540
  • White4,336
  • Multirace4,282
Science Average Scale Score:

4,323
State:

3,771
Science students tested: 130
# Absent - Not Tested: 1
Science # Answer Documents Submitted: 131

Science Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 5.3 (88%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 6.9 (86%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 8 (80%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 10 (84%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 19%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 25%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 52%

4%
19%
25%
52%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 4,318, Tested: 71, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 4%, Approaches: 19%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 52%)
4%
19%
25%
52%
Females: (Average Scale Score: 4,328, Tested: 59, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 25%, Masters: 51%)
3%
21%
25%
51%
Hispanic: (Average Scale Score: 4,096, Tested: 19, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 5%, Approaches: 27%, Meets: 31%, Masters: 37%)
5%
27%
31%
37%
Asian: (Average Scale Score: 4,540, Tested: 16, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 12%, Meets: 7%, Masters: 81%)
12%
7%
81%
White: (Average Scale Score: 4,336, Tested: 87, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 3%, Approaches: 21%, Meets: 27%, Masters: 49%)
3%
21%
27%
49%
Multirace: (Average Scale Score: 4,282, Tested: 8, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 13%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 38%, Masters: 50%)
13%
38%
50%

6th Grade
Math Average Scale Score:

1,912
Texas:

1,546
Math students tested: 9
Math # Answer Documents Submitted: 9

Math Avg Items Correct:
  • Reporting Category 1: 9 (90%)
  • Reporting Category 2: 14.2 (95%)
  • Reporting Category 3: 5.7 (94%)
  • Reporting Category 4: 6.6 (94%)

Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%
Approaches Grade Level Performance: 0%
Meets Grade Level Performance: 0%
Masters Grade Level Performance: 100%

100%
Males: (Average Scale Score: 1,895, Tested: 7, Did Not Meet Grade Level Performance: 0%, Approaches: 0%, Meets: 0%, Masters: 100%)
100%

Reading # Answer Documents Submitted: 9


Health & Safety


Chronic Student Absenteeismt:
Show data for

(State average from 7,777 schools)

A chronically absent student is a student who is absent 15 or more school days during the school year. A student is absent if he or she is not physically on school grounds and is not participating in instruction or instruction - related activities at an approved off-grounds location for at least half the school day. Each day that a student is absent for 50 percent or more of the school day should be counted. Any day that a student is absent for less than 50 percent of the school day should not be counted. The number of absences is based on the total number of school days absent. Chronically absent students include students who are absent for any reason(e.g., illness, suspension, the need to care for a family member), regardless of whether absences are excused or unexcused.

    Chronic Student Absenteeism

  • Hispanic4
  • Asian4
  • White19
  • IDEA7
  • 5044
Chronic Student Absenteeism: 27 (male: 12, female: 15)
  • Hispanic: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • Asian: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
  • White: 19 (male: 8, female: 11)
  • Individuals With Disabilities Education Act (IDEA): 7 (male: 5, female: 2)
  • Section 504: 4 (male: 2, female: 2)
Chronic Student Absenteeism per 1,000 students
Here:

34.4
Texas:

147.9

Comments


1
Report this comment as inappropriate
Apr 20, 2015 @ 5:17 pm
River Ridge is a pretty good school. I want to go there!!!

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss Austin, Texas (TX) on our hugely popular Texas forum.


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Some parts © 2020 Advameg, Inc.

Table of Contents