|
Back to: Gilbert, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 50.
Address: 3443 E. Calistoga
Gilbert, WI 85297
Schedule: 08:00 AM to 04:35 PM
Principal: Ms. Maureen E. Migacz
Phone (verify before calling): (480) 279-7000
Fax: (480) 279-7205
Homepage:
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 3
- Grade 5
- Grade 8
- Grade 4
- Grade 6
- Grade 7
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: |  14.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: |  22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 95.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Dropout Count In 2005: 1
Enrollment In 2002: 867
Enrollment In 2003: 1185
Enrollment In 2004: 1370
Enrollment In 2005: 1259
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| Adequate Yearly Progress: | 100.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| This school: | 97.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 76.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 65.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2005: 67.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 7.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 74.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 17.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 70.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 17.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: Yes
Made AYP In 2004: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: No
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: No
Grade 3
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 100
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 740 schools: | 9.60% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 16.72% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 55.74% |
Female Tested: 53
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 529 schools: | 9.74% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 747 schools: | 16.11% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 56.15% |
Male Tested: 47
Male Percent Tested: 98%
Male Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 657 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 17.90% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 55.63% |
Hispanic Tested: 23
Hispanic Percent Tested: 82%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 445 schools: | 16.43% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| This school: | 10.0% | | State average from 567 schools: | 22.17% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 608 schools: | 54.52% |
White Tested: 63
White Percent Tested: 102%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 458 schools: | 5.25% |
White Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 14.0% | | State average from 621 schools: | 12.00% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 667 schools: | 57.90% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 85%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 20.0% | | State average from 141 schools: | 39.46% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 239 schools: | 50.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 89
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 8.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 840 schools: | 16.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 56.41% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 100
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 6.51% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 616 schools: | 13.35% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 57.67% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 19.99% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 735 schools: | 22.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 18.64% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 514 schools: | 13.30% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 11.0% | | State average from 656 schools: | 26.82% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 192 schools: | 34.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 20.36% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Grade 3: | 14.0% | | State average from 618 schools: | 24.07% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 137
All Students Percent Tested: 99%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 823 schools: | 13.66% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 868 schools: | 17.23% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 47.16% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 23.28% |
Female Tested: 70
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 1.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 12.64% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 16.43% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 47.77% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 27.03% |
Male Tested: 67
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 16.63% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 18.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 46.86% |
Hispanic Tested: 28
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 521 schools: | 19.65% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 21.61% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 68.0% | | State average from 638 schools: | 47.17% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 574 schools: | 15.87% |
White Tested: 96
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 8.02% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 634 schools: | 12.77% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 672 schools: | 48.62% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 13
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 87%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 343 schools: | 39.62% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 350 schools: | 26.43% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 394 schools: | 39.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 124
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 777 schools: | 11.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 886 schools: | 48.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 24.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 650 schools: | 22.00% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 671 schools: | 46.15% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 119
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 8.72% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 13.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 742 schools: | 48.49% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 31.38% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 3: | 27.0% | | State average from 753 schools: | 21.15% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 658 schools: | 31.89% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 615 schools: | 14.46% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 117
All Students Percent Tested: 91%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 10.33% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 23.89% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 973 schools: | 56.03% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 879 schools: | 11.34% |
Female Tested: 58
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 660 schools: | 9.08% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 858 schools: | 22.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 58.17% |
Male Tested: 59
Male Percent Tested: 87%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 13.29% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 25.53% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 61.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 54.11% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 10.42% |
Hispanic Tested: 20
Hispanic Percent Tested: 91%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 593 schools: | 15.70% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 30.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 31.93% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 49.26% |
White Tested: 84
White Percent Tested: 93%
White Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 11.0% | | State average from 680 schools: | 14.66% |
White Meets Standards:
| This school: | 65.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 63.77% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 648 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 113
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 737 schools: | 8.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 15.0% | | State average from 952 schools: | 22.78% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 59.09% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 871 schools: | 12.21% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 21
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 91%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 15.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 745 schools: | 31.73% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 49.88% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 96
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 91%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 3.0% | | State average from 591 schools: | 6.46% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 770 schools: | 16.24% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 69.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 62.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 17.79% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 14.09% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 533 schools: | 5.32% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 600 schools: | 5.24% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 100
All Students Percent Tested: 98%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 10.03% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 861 schools: | 25.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 35.0% | | State average from 875 schools: | 36.04% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 834 schools: | 30.22% |
Female Tested: 51
Female Percent Tested: 94%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 585 schools: | 10.75% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 26.18% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 36.57% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 30.99% |
Male Tested: 46
Male Percent Tested: 96%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 11.85% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 25.83% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 778 schools: | 36.40% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 30.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 23
Hispanic Percent Tested: 82%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 448 schools: | 15.26% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 29.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 32.26% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 35.53% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 546 schools: | 22.53% |
White Tested: 59
White Percent Tested: 95%
White Falls Below Standards
| Grade 3: | 5.0% | | State average from 474 schools: | 5.63% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 654 schools: | 19.42% |
White Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 36.0% | | State average from 665 schools: | 37.75% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 658 schools: | 38.97% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 85%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 179 schools: | 35.18% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 248 schools: | 39.96% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 3: | 10.0% | | State average from 224 schools: | 37.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 89
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 706 schools: | 9.44% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 25.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 866 schools: | 36.62% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 30.96% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 100
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 513 schools: | 7.22% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 21.64% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 639 schools: | 37.42% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 619 schools: | 35.39% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 138
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 14.61% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 32.0% | | State average from 888 schools: | 24.19% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 889 schools: | 32.76% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Grade 3: | 21.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 30.01% |
Female Tested: 71
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 702 schools: | 14.62% |
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 24.99% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 814 schools: | 33.20% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 30.75% |
Male Tested: 67
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 16.25% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 800 schools: | 23.57% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 3: | 38.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 32.66% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 30.71% |
Hispanic Tested: 29
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 549 schools: | 19.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 621 schools: | 30.00% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 629 schools: | 32.65% |
White Tested: 96
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 574 schools: | 8.57% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 18.37% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 34.60% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 39.68% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 13
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 87%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 358 schools: | 36.58% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 377 schools: | 31.84% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 362 schools: | 30.06% |
Students With Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 285 schools: | 27.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 125
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 12.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 30.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.86% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 882 schools: | 33.74% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 31.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 19
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 20.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Grade 3: | 22.0% | | State average from 661 schools: | 30.12% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 31.92% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 625 schools: | 19.99% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 119
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 613 schools: | 9.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 732 schools: | 33.73% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 39.34% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 124
All Students Percent Tested: 97%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 10.75% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 957 schools: | 18.55% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 972 schools: | 53.50% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 27.0% | | State average from 919 schools: | 18.48% |
Female Tested: 58
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 710 schools: | 10.80% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 850 schools: | 19.32% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 54.64% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 793 schools: | 18.74% |
Male Tested: 66
Male Percent Tested: 97%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 12.42% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 870 schools: | 18.23% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 52.36% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 830 schools: | 19.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 21
Hispanic Percent Tested: 95%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 607 schools: | 15.23% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 24.80% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 57.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 52.65% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 9.55% |
White Tested: 89
White Percent Tested: 99%
White Approaches Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 672 schools: | 11.25% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 55.48% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 29.35% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 79%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 407 schools: | 29.90% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 428 schools: | 28.98% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 35.89% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 113
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 99%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 8.90% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 10.0% | | State average from 936 schools: | 17.37% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 964 schools: | 56.10% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 907 schools: | 20.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 22
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 96%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 15.05% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 729 schools: | 24.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 52.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 9.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 102
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 97%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 619 schools: | 7.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 757 schools: | 12.62% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 54.52% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 28.11% |
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 93
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Female Tested: 53
Female Percent Tested: 93%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 17.15% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 16.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 24.58% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 47.61% |
Male Tested: 39
Male Percent Tested: 95%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 22.69% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 25.12% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 785 schools: | 43.42% |
Hispanic Tested: 16
Hispanic Percent Tested: 94%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 29.73% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 602 schools: | 30.28% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 35.98% |
White Tested: 70
White Percent Tested: 96%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 607 schools: | 10.27% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 656 schools: | 19.79% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 54.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 86
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 93
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 13.38% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 22.19% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 53.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 51.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 11.55% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 679 schools: | 13.80% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 642 schools: | 11.14% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 439 schools: | 6.71% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 611 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 11.95% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 14.44% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 106
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 12.28% |
Female Tested: 59
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 16.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 41.36% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Tested: 47
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 24.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
Hispanic Tested: 27
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 17.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 38.83% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 630 schools: | 26.73% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 30.26% |
White Tested: 64
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 14.70% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 19.58% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 48.38% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 635 schools: | 17.99% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 97
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 52.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 784 schools: | 13.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 17
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 38.20% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 26.17% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 30.71% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 89
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 17.20% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 738 schools: | 20.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 54.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 46.59% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 17.72% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 12.47% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 6.70% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 6.64% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 118
All Students Percent Tested: 93%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 80.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Female Tested: 57
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 8.85% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 22.65% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 86.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 60.68% |
Male Tested: 61
Male Percent Tested: 90%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 74.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Hispanic Tested: 30
Hispanic Percent Tested: 94%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 15.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 695 schools: | 33.01% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 73.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.02% |
White Tested: 78
White Percent Tested: 93%
White Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 1.0% | | State average from 482 schools: | 5.24% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 14.21% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 86.0% | | State average from 691 schools: | 67.15% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 15
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 402 schools: | 25.78% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 54.73% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 23.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 112
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 82.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 24
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 89%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 94
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 94%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 586 schools: | 6.04% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 15.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 84.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 65.54% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 9.55% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 720 schools: | 11.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 681 schools: | 9.36% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 5.0% | | State average from 635 schools: | 15.35% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 826 schools: | 10.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 4.13% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 14.86% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 92
All Students Percent Tested: 94%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 12.45% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 37.01% |
Female Tested: 52
Female Percent Tested: 91%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 12.82% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 40.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 24.0% | | State average from 759 schools: | 13.07% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 37.27% |
Male Tested: 39
Male Percent Tested: 95%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 679 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 40.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 37.80% |
Male Meets Standards:
| This school: | 17.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 37.28% |
Hispanic Tested: 16
Hispanic Percent Tested: 94%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 47.13% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 532 schools: | 12.12% |
White Tested: 69
White Percent Tested: 95%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 531 schools: | 6.85% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 31.54% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 628 schools: | 13.85% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 49.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 86
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 12.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 38.07% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 92
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 538 schools: | 9.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 34.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 13.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 612 schools: | 44.25% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 106
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 59
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 59.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 14.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 47
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 13.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 788 schools: | 33.45% |
Hispanic Tested: 27
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 577 schools: | 20.88% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 54.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 48.88% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 12.61% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 606 schools: | 19.80% |
White Tested: 64
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 7.96% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 31.78% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 15.87% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 45.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 97
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 17
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 7.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 21.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 47.62% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 12.79% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 20.07% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 89
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 9.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 756 schools: | 33.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 716 schools: | 15.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 43.81% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 121
All Students Percent Tested: 95%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 19.39% |
Female Tested: 57
Female Percent Tested: 97%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 749 schools: | 12.44% |
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 26.0% | | State average from 851 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 60.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 50.29% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.44% |
Male Tested: 64
Male Percent Tested: 94%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 20.50% |
Hispanic Tested: 31
Hispanic Percent Tested: 97%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 19.20% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 25.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 61.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 46.24% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 611 schools: | 10.53% |
White Tested: 80
White Percent Tested: 95%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 6.97% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 13.14% |
White Meets Standards:
| This school: | 65.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 52.41% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 29.07% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 112
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 67.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 21.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 26
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 96%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 9.85% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 95
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 95%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 7.86% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 14.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 782 schools: | 51.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 734 schools: | 28.54% |
Grade 8
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 63
All Students Percent Tested: 124%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.74% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 21.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 21.13% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 473 schools: | 39.95% |
Female Tested: 34
Female Percent Tested: 117%
Female Approaches Standards
| This school: | 23.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 21.97% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 399 schools: | 42.48% |
Male Tested: 27
Male Percent Tested: 123%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 30.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 28.33% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 22.0% | | State average from 411 schools: | 20.48% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 416 schools: | 37.73% |
White Tested: 44
White Percent Tested: 119%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 324 schools: | 14.25% |
White Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 23.0% | | State average from 338 schools: | 18.16% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 46.88% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 57
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 121%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 23.55% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 464 schools: | 21.02% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 8: | 32.0% | | State average from 462 schools: | 40.71% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 63
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 19.98% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 19.82% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 363 schools: | 43.30% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 424 schools: | 14.85% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 389 schools: | 21.13% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 348 schools: | 15.61% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 13.0% | | State average from 354 schools: | 14.92% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 320 schools: | 21.13% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 415 schools: | 15.36% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 332 schools: | 17.57% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 122
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 511 schools: | 32.52% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 503 schools: | 18.95% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 505 schools: | 34.30% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 449 schools: | 14.84% |
Female Tested: 55
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 31.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 28.98% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 432 schools: | 19.82% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 36.30% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 16.07% |
Male Tested: 67
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 447 schools: | 35.90% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 14.0% | | State average from 433 schools: | 18.14% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 438 schools: | 32.58% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 384 schools: | 14.47% |
Hispanic Tested: 22
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 39.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 46.46% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 336 schools: | 20.83% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 340 schools: | 27.00% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 272 schools: | 6.72% |
White Tested: 88
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 382 schools: | 20.03% |
White Approaches Standards
| This school: | 12.0% | | State average from 379 schools: | 17.60% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 41.27% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 364 schools: | 21.44% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 105
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 28.83% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 488 schools: | 19.40% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 493 schools: | 36.41% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 443 schools: | 16.07% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 18
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 47.34% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 366 schools: | 26.22% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 104
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 33.0% | | State average from 430 schools: | 23.06% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 17.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 40.0% | | State average from 426 schools: | 39.57% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 385 schools: | 20.34% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 114
All Students Percent Tested: 97%
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 26.61% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 71.0% | | State average from 566 schools: | 58.01% |
Female Tested: 56
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 24.94% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 61.61% |
Male Tested: 58
Male Percent Tested: 95%
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 491 schools: | 28.22% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 496 schools: | 54.73% |
Hispanic Tested: 25
Hispanic Percent Tested: 96%
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 398 schools: | 36.16% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 395 schools: | 45.37% |
White Tested: 74
White Percent Tested: 96%
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 16.86% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 77.0% | | State average from 410 schools: | 70.72% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 101
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 544 schools: | 25.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 77.0% | | State average from 552 schools: | 62.25% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 14
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 36.52% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 45.52% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 100
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 96%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 456 schools: | 19.29% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 8: | 74.0% | | State average from 461 schools: | 67.32% |
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 509 schools: | 11.10% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 404 schools: | 5.34% |
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 455 schools: | 13.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 309 schools: | 5.13% |
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 361 schools: | 17.48% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Grade 8: | 3.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 5.88% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 6.84% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 337 schools: | 7.94% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 63
All Students Percent Tested: 124%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 39.0% | | State average from 480 schools: | 38.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 475 schools: | 41.22% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 403 schools: | 14.65% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 319 schools: | 7.76% |
Female Tested: 34
Female Percent Tested: 117%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 400 schools: | 38.00% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Grade 8: | 42.0% | | State average from 401 schools: | 42.77% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 327 schools: | 14.55% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 8: | 10.0% | | State average from 247 schools: | 7.08% |
Male Tested: 27
Male Percent Tested: 123%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 422 schools: | 37.74% |
Male Approaches Standards
| This school: | 43.0% | | State average from 413 schools: | 39.95% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 8: | 9.0% | | State average from 347 schools: | 15.64% |
| 