School For Applied Technology in Miami, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 7.

5120 NW 24TH AVE
Miami, FL 33142

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Mast Academy School (7.2 miles):

94
Somerset Arts Conservatory School (17.8 miles):

71
Mater Academy Charter High School (7.9 miles):

51
Thompson Academy School (12.3 miles):

33
South Miami Senior High School (8.2 miles):

20
School For Applied Technology:

7
Westland Hialeah Senior High School (3.4 miles):

7
Corporate Academy North School (0.0 miles):

1
School For Applied Technology rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Miami-Dade County:

45
Miami:

44
School For Applied Technology:

7

Review, comment, or add new information about this topic:


Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (305) 573-5499 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 13
School number: 8171
School type: Senior High
District Name: DADE
Grade range: GRADES 9 TO 12
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (305) 573-2184
Principal: Charles Yseult
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 17
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 109
Senate District: 39
School Web Address: http://sfat.dadeschools.net

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

6%
State average from 451 schools:

62%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

46%
State average from 451 schools:

77%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

96%
State average from 452 schools:

86%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

34%
State average from 451 schools:

48%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

6%
State average from 452 schools:

58%
Making Math Gains
Here:

66%
State average from 449 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

3%
State average from 452 schools:

52%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

63%
State average from 452 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

320
State average from 452 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 450 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: Pending

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

84%
State average from 454 schools:

50%
Minority Rate
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

100%
State average from 454 schools:

47%
Region: 5

Title I: YES


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 14
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

6%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 34
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 34

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

46%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 19
Number of Students Tested in Math: 19
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 16
Number of Students Tested in Math: 17
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 16
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 29
Number of Students Tested in Math: 29
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 28
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

18%
State average from 443 schools:

60%
Meeting High Standards in Math
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

58%
State average from 440 schools:

75%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

82%
State average from 443 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

36%
State average from 443 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

51%
State average from 441 schools:

59%
Making Math Gains
Here:

80%
State average from 442 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

50%
State average from 442 schools:

56%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

77%
State average from 441 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

452
State average from 441 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

95%
State average from 448 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: C

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 446 schools:

46%
Minority Rate
Here:

98%
State average from 451 schools:

45%
Region: 5


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 60 (96%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 60 (96%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

80%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 15
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: No
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 47

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

58%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 50
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 20
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 19
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 34 (94%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (94%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 28
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 43 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 43 (98%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

16%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 36

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

57%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 35
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: C
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 48 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 35
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 44

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

56%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 48
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 45
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 21
Number of Students Tested in Math: 21
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 26
Number of Students Tested in Math: 26
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 20
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 26
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 27
Number of Students Tested in Math: 27
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 18
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 25
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 4
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2006-2007 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

9%
State average from 370 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

33%
State average from 370 schools:

69%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

78%
State average from 370 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

30%
State average from 370 schools:

41%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

27%
State average from 370 schools:

52%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 370 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

27%
State average from 370 schools:

49%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

70%
State average from 370 schools:

67%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 Columns
Here:

345
State average from 370 schools:

482
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 370 schools:

97%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2006: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: NO

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

Grade in 2007: P

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

61%
State average from 372 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

95%
State average from 372 schools:

48%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 62 (100%)

Writing Performance Percent Proficient
Here:

95%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 37
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

33%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 58
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 39 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

31%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 28

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

40%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 45
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2007 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2005-2006 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

12%
State average from 360 schools:

45%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

45%
State average from 361 schools:

68%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

81%
State average from 361 schools:

83%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

48%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Making Math Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 361 schools:

72%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

57%
State average from 361 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

314
State average from 361 schools:

374
Percent Tested
Here:

99%
State average from 361 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: YES

Grade in 2006: P

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

74%
State average from 362 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

93%
State average from 362 schools:

47%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 80 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (99%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

97%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 36
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

12%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 73
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 71
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 34 (100%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

13%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

35%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 31
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 40 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 39 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 15

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

11%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 36
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

54%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 62 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 61 (99%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 27

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

10%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 59
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

45%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 58
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 3
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures 2006 School Grade: P
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2004-2005 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

15%
State average from 348 schools:

42%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

51%
State average from 348 schools:

67%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

86%
State average from 348 schools:

84%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

35%
State average from 348 schools:

51%
Making Math Gains
Here:

77%
State average from 348 schools:

73%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

37%
State average from 348 schools:

53%
Points Earned Sum of Previous 6 Columns
Here:

301
State average from 348 schools:

371
Percent Tested
Here:

98%
State average from 348 schools:

98%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains: No%

Grade in 2005: D

Grade in 2004: F

Grade in 2003: D

Grade in 2002: N

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

70%
State average from 347 schools:

38%
Minority Rate
Here:

89%
State average from 348 schools:

45%

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1790
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

288
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

55%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

5%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

5%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

9%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

9
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1717
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

15%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

85%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

15%
State average:

28%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1827
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

273
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

32%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

23%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

9%
State average:

21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

32%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1987
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

324
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

85%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

38%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

38%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

23%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

62%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

6
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

6
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

7
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

5
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1814
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

292
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 18%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1793
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

275
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 5%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 6

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 34%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 34%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 34%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 6
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1923
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

302
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 11%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1945
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

314
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 29%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 48%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

4
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 4%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 61%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

1770
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

284
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 11%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1851
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

286
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 3%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 7

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1918
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 56%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1931
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

310
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 21%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 55%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

18
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

675
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

42
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
Here:

11
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

9
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

10
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

6
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

12
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

8
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

33
State average:

237
Mean Scale Score
Here:

705
State average from 2096 schools:

709
Median NPR
Here:

63
State average:

65
Literary (max 18)
Here:

15
State average:

14
Informational (max 18)
Here:

13
State average:

13
Functional (max 18)
Here:

14
State average:

14
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

9
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

15
State average:

15
Critical Analysis (max 12)
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

10
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

7
State average:

8

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 39
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

276
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 49%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 26%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

4
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 46%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 82%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1834
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 15%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 10
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1835
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1801
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 33

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1669
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 73%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 5%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 7
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 9
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1671
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1728
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -58

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

281
State average:

295
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 13: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 14: 6

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1816
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 31%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 81%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1804
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1754
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 50

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1885
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

299
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 51%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 32%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 35%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 76%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1900
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1816
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 84

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Here:

692
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 60
Literary (max 18): 13
Informational (max 18): 12
Functional (max 18): 13
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 14
Critical Analysis (max 14): 10
Strategies (max 10): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
SCHOOL FOR APPLIED TECHNOLOGY:

678
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 36
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 26
Mean Scale Score
Here:

696
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 59
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 7
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 7

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 38
Mean Scale Score
Here:

700
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 49
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 40
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

260
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 20%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 20%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 3%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 45%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 80%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 60%

  1. All Cities
  2. Florida forum
  3. Florida
  4. Miami, FL
  5. School For Applied Technology in Miami, Florida (FL)


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2024 Advameg, Inc.