Wettman Education Center School in New Port Richey, Florida (FL)



City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 28.

5520 GRAND BLVD
New Port Richey, FL 34652

Show street view No street view available for this location
Other nearby schools ratings:
Hospital/Homebound School (19.7 miles):

90
Walker Middle School (12.2 miles):

74
Joseph L. Carwise Middle School (10.5 miles):

65
Hospital/Homebound School (19.7 miles):

55
James W. Mitchell High School (4.3 miles):

45
Dunedin High School (14.9 miles):

36
Wettman Education Center School:

28
Webb Middle School (19.0 miles):

16
Wettman Education Center School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:
Florida:

45
Pasco County:

43
New Port Richey:

44
Wettman Education Center School:

28

Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:

CAPTCHA






Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum
Phone: (727) 774-0001 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 51
School number: 242
School type: Senior High
District Name: PASCO
Grade range: GRADES 6 TO 12
Accredited by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Fax Number (verify independently before using): (727) 774-0091
Principal: Mimi Foster
The main educational program offered at the school: Alternative Education
Congressional District (The assigned Congressional District for the area in which the school is located.): 9
House District (The assigned Florida House of Representatives District for the area in which the school is located.): 46
Senate District: 11
School Web Address: WWW.PASCO.K12.FL.US

2009-2010 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

73%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

82%
State average from 133 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

44%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

61%
Making Math Gains
Here:

76%
State average from 132 schools:

69%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 133 schools:

57%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

76%
State average from 133 schools:

66%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

565
State average from 133 schools:

522
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 132 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2010: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2010: YES

Grade in 2010: A

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

66%
State average from 137 schools:

57%
Minority Rate
Here:

78%
State average from 137 schools:

53%
Region: 3

Title I: NO


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2009-2010



AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 88 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

18%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 39
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 30

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 37
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 29
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (95%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 17

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

20%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

30%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 24
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (96%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 23

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 22
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2009-2010 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2008-2009 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

70%
State average from 141 schools:

64%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

66%
State average from 133 schools:

72%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

89%
State average from 139 schools:

85%
Meeting High Standards in Science
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

45%
State average from 133 schools:

47%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 133 schools:

65%
Making Math Gains
Here:

73%
State average from 136 schools:

68%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

71%
State average from 133 schools:

64%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

72%
State average from 133 schools:

67%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

551
State average from 133 schools:

540
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 134 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2009: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2009: YES

Grade in 2009: A

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

59%
State average from 132 schools:

53%
Minority Rate
Here:

75%
State average from 139 schools:

52%
Region: 3


Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2008-2009



AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 117 (78%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 114 (77%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

17%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 29
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 26

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

7%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 27
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 102 (80%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (78%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 21
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 3
Number of Students Tested in Math: 4
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 93 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 17
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2008-2009 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 61 (74%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 59 (73%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 16
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 8
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

2007-2008 School Grades

Meeting High Standards in Reading
Here:

74%
State average from 124 schools:

66%
Meeting High Standards in Math
Here:

69%
State average from 124 schools:

71%
Meeting High Standards in Writing
Here:

91%
State average from 125 schools:

84%
Meeting High Standards in Science
Here:

52%
State average from 122 schools:

46%
Making Reading Gains
Here:

65%
State average from 122 schools:

63%
Making Math Gains
Here:

69%
State average from 122 schools:

71%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading
Here:

68%
State average from 122 schools:

61%
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Math
Here:

65%
State average from 122 schools:

70%
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)
Here:

553
State average from 122 schools:

535
Percent Tested
Here:

100%
State average from 124 schools:

99%
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains - 2008: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2007: YES

50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math - 2008: YES

Grade in 2008: A

Grade in 2007: A

Grade in 2006: A

Charter: NO

Free or Reduced Lunch Rate
Here:

55%
State average from 126 schools:

49%
Minority Rate
Here:

73%
State average from 125 schools:

52%

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2007-2008



AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (79%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 98 (81%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: N

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

22%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

23%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 18
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 75 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 9
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 3
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (77%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 71 (79%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 15
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 17
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 14
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 2
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 2
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2007-2008 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 48 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (76%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 6
Reading Growth Model - Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Growth Model - Number with Scores: 4
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2006-2007



AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 99 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 103 (83%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Increased Graduation Rate by 1%: Y

Reading Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

21%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 19
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency Percent Proficient
Here:

27%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 22
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 82 (82%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (84%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 18
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 6
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 70 (81%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (82%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 2
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 15
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2006-2007 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 36 (75%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 38 (77%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 4
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 2005-2006



AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 97 (89%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 94 (88%)

Writing Performance - Percent Proficient
Here:

64%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 14
Performance - Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes

Reading Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

9%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 35
- 44% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: No

Math Proficiency - Percent Proficient
Here:

19%
State average from 27 schools:

59%
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 32
- 50% scoring at or above grade level in Math: No
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (88%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 78 (86%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 11
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 28
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 25
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 12
Number of Students Tested in Math: 12
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 6
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ASIAN
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 77 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (85%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 26
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 23
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: LIMITED ENGLISH PROFICIENCY
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 7
Number of Students Tested in Math: 7
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 3
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

AYP 2005-2006 - Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 47 (86%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 47 (86%)
Writing Performance - Number with Scores: 8
Reading Proficiency - Number with Scores: 17
Math Proficiency - Number with Scores: 16
School-Wide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010 - 2011 Results


2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1512
State average:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

260
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

39%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

44%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

6%
State average:

23%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

65%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

3
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1671
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

265
State average:

308
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

12%
State average:

33%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

2%
State average:

16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

14%
State average:

52%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

11
State average:

16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

4
State average:

6

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1838
State average:

1922
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

296
State average:

312
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

39%
State average:

25%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

36%
State average:

30%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

18%
State average:

26%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

25%
State average:

45%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

10
State average:

11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1711
State average:

1938
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

260
State average:

302
Percent Passing
Here:

33%
State average:

56%
% in each Achievement Level 1
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

58%
State average:

35%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

25%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

8%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

8%
State average:

8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

17%
State average:

37%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Here:

5
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Here:

12
State average:

15
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
Here:

6
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

236
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

56%
State average:

27%
% in each Achievement Level 2
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

16%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

16%
State average:

41%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Here:

6
State average:

9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Here:

6
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7

2010 - 2011 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1555
State average:

1786
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

248
State average:

306
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

50%
State average:

23%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

39%
State average:

20%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

11%
State average:

31%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

11%
State average:

57%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

2
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

1744
State average:

1892
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

282
State average:

320
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

51%
State average:

15%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

21%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

26%
State average:

38%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

3%
State average:

17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

28%
State average:

64%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

4
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

4
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

3
State average:

5

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1873
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

21%
State average:

17%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

41%
State average:

22%
% in each Achievement Level 3
Here:

28%
State average:

31%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

7%
State average:

21%
% in each Achievement Level 5
Here:

3%
State average:

9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

38%
State average:

61%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

4
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

4

2010 - 2011 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1891
State average:

1995
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

300
State average:

326
Percent Passing
Here:

42%
State average:

80%
% in each Achievement Level 1
Here:

25%
State average:

13%
% in each Achievement Level 2
Here:

50%
State average:

18%
% in each Achievement Level 3
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

8%
State average:

28%
% in each Achievement Level 4
Here:

17%
State average:

33%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above
Here:

25%
State average:

69%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Here:

5
State average:

7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Here:

3
State average:

5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Here:

3
State average:

6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Here:

5
State average:

8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
Here:

4
State average:

5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1345
State average:

1707
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

310
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1425
State average:

1800
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

244
State average:

315
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

1586
State average:

1864
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 21%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1611
State average:

1907
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

255
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1639
State average:

1921
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

247
State average:

299
Percent Passing: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 74%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 13%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 13%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

222
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 5

2009 - 2010 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1325
State average:

1679
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

229
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 82%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1490
State average:

1799
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

232
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 4

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1618
State average:

1876
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

250
State average:

316
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1713
State average:

1925
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

240
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 56%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2009 - 2010 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1760
State average:

1972
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

269
State average:

321
Percent Passing: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009 - 2010 Writing Results



2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 23
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 39%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5 - Combined: 4%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 35%

2009 - 2010 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 22
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

3
State average from 27 schools:

59
Unscore - Combined: 5
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 18%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 5%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 36%

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1303
State average:

1696
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

238
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 71%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1473
State average:

1775
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

253
State average:

311
% in each Achievement Level 1: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 6
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1560
State average:

1857
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

304
% in each Achievement Level 1: 61%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 17%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 17%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1674
State average:

1894
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

266
State average:

307
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 16%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 20%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1612
State average:

1935
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

302
Percent Passing: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 78%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 9%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 5

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

205
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 85%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 15%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 4
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 4
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2008 - 209 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1349
State average:

1670
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

235
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 86%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 7%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1437
State average:

1801
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

219
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 90%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 10%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 2
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1667
State average:

1882
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

263
State average:

317
% in each Achievement Level 1: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 10%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 5
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1783
State average:

1915
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

261
State average:

299
% in each Achievement Level 1: 53%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 3

2008 - 209 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score
Here:

1835
State average:

1984
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

287
State average:

323
Percent Passing: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 37%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 47%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 16%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 2

Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008 - 2009 Norm-Referenced Test



2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

11
State average:

190
Mean Scale Score
Here:

608
State average from 2604 schools:

671
Median NPR
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

11
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
Here:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

7
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

8
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

6
State average:

201

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

10
State average:

192
Mean Scale Score
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

609
State average from 2497 schools:

687
Median NPR
Here:

6
State average:

63
Literary (max 18)
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

6
State average:

12
Informational (max 18)
Here:

5
State average:

12
Functional (max 18)
Here:

5
State average:

13
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

3
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

6
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

10
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

3
State average:

7

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

30
State average:

273
Mean Scale Score
Here:

643
State average from 2275 schools:

694
Median NPR
Here:

17
State average:

61
Literary (max 18)
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

8
State average:

13
Informational (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Functional (max 18)
Here:

6
State average:

11
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Here:

4
State average:

7
Interpretation (max 20)
Here:

8
State average:

14
Critical Analysis (max 12)
Here:

5
State average:

9
Strategies (max 10)
Here:

4
State average:

5

2008 - 2009 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students
Here:

9
State average:

237

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 19
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

215
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 16%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 16%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 7
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 26%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 11%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 21%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5 - Combined: 11%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 42%

2008 - 2009 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 20
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

220
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 75%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 25%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 8 - Combined: 3
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 8
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 5%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 10%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 20%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 35%

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1393
State average from 878 schools:

1661
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

254
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 29%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 10: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 20: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 2
Percent Matched to 2006: 43%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1294
State average:

1663
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1273
State average:

1592
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 21

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1523
State average from 808 schools:

1746
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

263
State average:

305
% in each Achievement Level 1: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 6%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 22: 11
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 7: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 75%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1582
State average:

1743
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1555
State average:

1668
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 28

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1575
State average from 819 schools:

1810
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

245
State average:

294
% in each Achievement Level 1: 67%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 10%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 10%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 24: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 13: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 43%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1659
State average:

1807
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1611
State average:

1738
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 48

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1697
State average from 612 schools:

1849
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

270
State average:

298
% in each Achievement Level 1: 58%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 5%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 16%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 8
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 5
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 44%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1739
State average:

1837
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1717
State average:

1779
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: 21

2006 - 207 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1863
State average from 573 schools:

1879
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

288
State average:

291
Percent Passing: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 27%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 16: 9
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 18: 11
Percent Matched to 2006: 36%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1879
State average:

1873
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1905
State average:

1876
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007 - 2006: -26

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

242
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 62%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 8%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 6
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 6
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 4

2006 - 207 FCAT Science Grade 11 Test Results:

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1213
State average from 873 schools:

1641
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

203
State average:

302
% in each Achievement Level 1: 79%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 14%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 8: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1168
State average:

1645
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1399
State average:

1620
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: -231

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1458
State average from 804 schools:

1777
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

224
State average:

303
% in each Achievement Level 1: 76%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 12%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 12%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 9: 2
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 9: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 9: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 59%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1568
State average:

1774
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1557
State average:

1645
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 11

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1556
State average from 815 schools:

1851
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

234
State average:

309
% in each Achievement Level 1: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 19%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 12: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 12: 2
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 48%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1749
State average:

1845
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1545
State average:

1755
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 204

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

1755
State average from 613 schools:

1884
Mean Scale Score 100-500
Here:

252
State average:

290
% in each Achievement Level 1: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 6%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 25%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 8: 3
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 7: 3
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 10: 3
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 8: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 50%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1757
State average:

1869
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1692
State average:

1821
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 65

2006 - 207 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 0-3000
Here:

1920
State average from 581 schools:

1950
Mean Scale Score 100-500
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

308
State average:

315
Percent Passing: 64%
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 57%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 29%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 36%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 4
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 10: 4
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 14: 3
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 14: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 11: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 21%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007
Here:

1967
State average:

1939
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006
Here:

1933
State average:

1901
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007 - 2006: 34

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

644
State average from 874 schools:

671
Median NPR: 37
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 9
Functional (max 18): 10
Initial Understanding (max 12): 7
Interpretation (max 20): 11
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

638
State average from 796 schools:

675
Median NPR: 28
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 12): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 12): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 17
Mean Scale Score
Here:

634
State average from 810 schools:

685
Median NPR: 17
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 6
Functional (max 18): 7
Initial Understanding (max 10): 4
Interpretation (max 20): 9
Critical Analysis (max 14): 6
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 29
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 597 schools:

696
Median NPR: 38
Literary (max 18): 11
Informational (max 18): 8
Functional (max 18): 11
Initial Understanding (max 10): 6
Interpretation (max 20): 12
Critical Analysis (max 14): 7
Strategies (max 10): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Reading Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

658
State average from 575 schools:

695
Median NPR: 19
Literary (max 18): 10
Informational (max 18): 7
Functional (max 18): 9
Initial Understanding (max 10): 5
Interpretation (max 20): 10
Critical Analysis (max 14): 8
Strategies (max 10): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Number of Students: 14
Mean Scale Score
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

626
State average from 874 schools:

669
Median NPR: 22
Number Sense (max 10): 4
Operations (max 12): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 7): 2
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 11): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Number of Students: 10
Mean Scale Score
Here:

654
State average from 796 schools:

685
Median NPR: 39
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 4
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 4
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students: 16
Mean Scale Score
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

653
State average from 810 schools:

698
Median NPR: 25
Number Sense (max 9): 3
Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 9): 3
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 9): 2
Geometry and Measurement (max 12): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 9 Test Results:
Number of Students: 30
Mean Scale Score
Here:

679
State average from 597 schools:

708
Median NPR: 42
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 5
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 6
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 5

2006 - 2007 FCAT Math Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students: 11
Mean Scale Score
Here:

670
State average from 575 schools:

710
Median NPR: 21
Number Sense and Operations (max 9): 3
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 15): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 12): 3
Geometry and Measurement (max 14): 4

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 8 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
SCHWETTMAN EDUCATION CENTER:

224
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 69%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 8%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 11 - Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 7 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 17 - Combined: 7
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3 - Combined: 23%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 23%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 54%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 23%

2006 - 2007 FCAT Writing Grade 10 Test Results:
Number of Students - Combined: 13
Mean Writing Score 100-500 - Combined
Here:

236
State average from 27 schools:

59
% in each Achievement Level 1 - Combined: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 2 - Combined: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 3 - Combined: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4 - Combined: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above - Combined: 38%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Support max 9 - Combined: 4
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18 - Combined: 9
Type of Writing - Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt - Combined
Here:

3
State average:

59
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5 - Combined: 8%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4 - Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5 - Combined: 31%
Percent 3.5 or Above - Combined: 54%
Percent 4.0 or Above - Combined: 46%


City-data.com does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of any information on this site.  Use at your own risk.
Website © 2018 Advameg, Inc.