|
Back to: Snowflake, AZ, Arizona, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Arizona forum.
City-data.com school rating (using weighted 2004-2007 test average as compared to other schools in Arizona) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 45.
Address: 62 West 2nd South
Snowflake, WI 85937
Grade span: 4-6
Schedule: 07:00 AM to 04:00 PM
Principal: Mr. Wayne T Cottle
Phone (verify before calling): (928) 536-4156
Fax: (928) 536-2995
Homepage: www.Snowflake.k12.az.us
E-mail:
- Adequate Yearly Progress
- Grade 5
- Grade 4
- Grade 6
Adequate Yearly Progress
Attendance Rate In 2003:
| Here: |  3.0% | | State average from 1771 schools: |  22.88% |
Attendance Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 92.0% | | State average from 1661 schools: | 93.64% |
Attendance Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 94.0% | | State average from 1721 schools: | 94.51% |
Attendance Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1763 schools: | 94.21% |
Enrollment In 2002: 317
Enrollment In 2003: 309
Enrollment In 2004: 328
Enrollment In 2005: 330
Promotion Rate In 2003:
| This school: | 99.0% | | State average from 1537 schools: | 96.09% |
Promotion Rate In 2004:
| Here: | 99.0% | | State average from 989 schools: | 97.14% |
Promotion Rate In 2005:
| Here: | 96.0% | | State average from 1674 schools: | 87.97% |
Promotion Rate In 2006:
| Here: | 93.0% | | State average from 1742 schools: | 83.46% |
Teacher Count In 2004: 15.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2004: 2.50
Teacher Count In 2005: 16.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2005: 3.00
Teacher Count In 2006: 15.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2006: 3.00
Teacher Count In 2007: 15.00
Teacher Aid Count In 2007: 3.00
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2004: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2004: No
Made AYP In 2004: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2005: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2005: No
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2005: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2005: No
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2006: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2006: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2006: Yes
Met Percent Tested Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Attendance Rate Criteria In 2007: Yes
Met Graduation Rate Criteria In 2007: Not Evaluated
Made AYP In 2007: Yes
Grade 5
Writing - 2004
All Students Tested: 106
All Students Percent Tested: 102%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 19.36% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 33.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 24.82% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 45.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 45.50% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 17.15% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 786 schools: | 24.58% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 792 schools: | 47.61% |
Male Tested: 59
Male Percent Tested: 104%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 761 schools: | 22.69% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 25.12% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 785 schools: | 43.42% |
White Tested: 70
White Percent Tested: 83%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 607 schools: | 10.27% |
White Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 33.0% | | State average from 656 schools: | 19.79% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 54.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 98
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 102%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 818 schools: | 18.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 33.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 24.63% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 46.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 96
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 8.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 13.38% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 22.19% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 48.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 51.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 11.55% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 679 schools: | 13.80% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 642 schools: | 11.14% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 611 schools: | 16.76% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Grade 5: | 13.0% | | State average from 771 schools: | 11.95% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 14.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 14.44% |
Writing - 2005
All Students Tested: 103
All Students Percent Tested: 96%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 887 schools: | 26.85% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 895 schools: | 22.94% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 47.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 39.07% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 12.28% |
Female Tested: 43
Female Percent Tested: 91%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 774 schools: | 24.29% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 23.51% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 41.36% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Tested: 60
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 804 schools: | 30.03% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 27.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 22.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 37.25% |
White Tested: 88
White Percent Tested: 96%
White Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 14.70% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 26.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 19.58% |
White Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 50.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 48.38% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 635 schools: | 17.99% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 11
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 85%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 393 schools: | 59.97% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 328 schools: | 26.07% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 306 schools: | 29.49% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 92
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 23.98% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 877 schools: | 23.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 878 schools: | 41.03% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 784 schools: | 13.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 103
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 17.20% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 738 schools: | 20.23% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 47.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 46.59% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 17.72% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 5: | 3.0% | | State average from 687 schools: | 12.47% |
Writing - 2006
All Students Tested: 93
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 809 schools: | 10.88% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 908 schools: | 23.60% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 920 schools: | 57.71% |
Female Tested: 53
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 21.86% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 69.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 60.56% |
Male Tested: 40
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 13.43% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 825 schools: | 25.52% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 841 schools: | 54.99% |
Hispanic Tested: 11
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 33.0% | | State average from 567 schools: | 17.19% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 665 schools: | 32.71% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 48.42% |
White Tested: 74
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 481 schools: | 5.37% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 14.22% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 72.0% | | State average from 694 schools: | 67.43% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 12
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 33.87% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 487 schools: | 36.89% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 460 schools: | 32.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 81
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 21.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 906 schools: | 61.89% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 52
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 16.36% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 32.31% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 49.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 41
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 537 schools: | 6.11% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 15.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 64.0% | | State average from 750 schools: | 66.20% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 780 schools: | 9.64% |
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 624 schools: | 10.07% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 673 schools: | 11.77% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 642 schools: | 9.57% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 618 schools: | 15.24% |
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 8.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 10.76% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 4.39% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 15.40% |
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 123
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 10.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 23.96% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 66.0% | | State average from 962 schools: | 57.87% |
Female Tested: 56
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 8.85% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 22.65% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 70.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 60.68% |
Male Tested: 67
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 13.28% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 867 schools: | 25.42% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 55.17% |
Hispanic Tested: 16
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 15.94% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| This school: | 38.0% | | State average from 695 schools: | 33.01% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.02% |
White Tested: 95
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 482 schools: | 5.24% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 14.21% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 691 schools: | 67.15% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 26
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 35.0% | | State average from 402 schools: | 25.78% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 38.0% | | State average from 450 schools: | 54.73% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 397 schools: | 23.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 97
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 713 schools: | 7.71% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 926 schools: | 22.39% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 73.0% | | State average from 946 schools: | 61.93% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 60
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 645 schools: | 15.42% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| This school: | 35.0% | | State average from 721 schools: | 32.95% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 49.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 63
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 586 schools: | 6.04% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 15.89% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 73.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 65.54% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 9.55% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 720 schools: | 11.56% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 681 schools: | 9.36% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 7.0% | | State average from 635 schools: | 15.35% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 826 schools: | 10.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 506 schools: | 4.13% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 14.86% |
Math - 2004
All Students Tested: 106
All Students Percent Tested: 102%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 13.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 859 schools: | 39.10% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 12.45% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 832 schools: | 37.01% |
Female Tested: 46
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 633 schools: | 12.82% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 51.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 40.21% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 759 schools: | 13.07% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 37.27% |
Male Tested: 59
Male Percent Tested: 104%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 679 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| This school: | 56.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 37.80% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 733 schools: | 12.59% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 765 schools: | 37.28% |
White Tested: 70
White Percent Tested: 83%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 531 schools: | 6.85% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 666 schools: | 31.54% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 628 schools: | 13.85% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 49.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 98
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 102%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 754 schools: | 12.34% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 855 schools: | 38.80% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 827 schools: | 12.69% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 828 schools: | 38.07% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 96
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 538 schools: | 9.03% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 632 schools: | 34.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| This school: | 18.0% | | State average from 610 schools: | 13.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 612 schools: | 44.25% |
Math - 2005
All Students Tested: 104
All Students Percent Tested: 97%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 14.67% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 901 schools: | 40.05% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 15.0% | | State average from 862 schools: | 13.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 32.55% |
Female Tested: 44
Female Percent Tested: 94%
Female Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 9.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 14.20% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 41.56% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 16.0% | | State average from 769 schools: | 14.54% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 25.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 32.52% |
Male Tested: 60
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.56% |
Male Approaches Standards
| This school: | 36.0% | | State average from 820 schools: | 38.56% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 768 schools: | 13.81% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 37.0% | | State average from 788 schools: | 33.45% |
White Tested: 89
White Percent Tested: 97%
White Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 7.96% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 31.78% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 15.87% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 34.0% | | State average from 669 schools: | 45.63% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 12
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 92%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 42.0% | | State average from 369 schools: | 43.65% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 405 schools: | 44.24% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 198 schools: | 16.26% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 92
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 98%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 801 schools: | 12.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 41.0% | | State average from 883 schools: | 39.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 853 schools: | 14.47% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 36.0% | | State average from 857 schools: | 34.57% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 104
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 9.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 42.0% | | State average from 756 schools: | 33.44% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 716 schools: | 15.25% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 43.81% |
Math - 2006
All Students Tested: 93
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 849 schools: | 14.02% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 904 schools: | 19.27% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 50.0% | | State average from 918 schools: | 47.89% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 846 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Tested: 53
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.27% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 27.0% | | State average from 812 schools: | 19.81% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 48.0% | | State average from 839 schools: | 49.58% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 12.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 20.81% |
Male Tested: 40
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 744 schools: | 16.23% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.29% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 844 schools: | 46.18% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 763 schools: | 21.36% |
Hispanic Tested: 11
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 20.32% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 653 schools: | 25.58% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 678 schools: | 45.55% |
White Tested: 74
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| Grade 5: | 13.0% | | State average from 568 schools: | 7.62% |
White Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 18.0% | | State average from 659 schools: | 12.76% |
White Meets Standards:
| This school: | 55.0% | | State average from 693 schools: | 51.09% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 648 schools: | 30.59% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 12
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 75.0% | | State average from 476 schools: | 43.09% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 472 schools: | 27.80% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 452 schools: | 27.54% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 81
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 725 schools: | 10.52% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 18.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 903 schools: | 51.30% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 835 schools: | 22.65% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 52
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 652 schools: | 20.35% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 24.0% | | State average from 697 schools: | 25.49% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 49.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 45.43% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 622 schools: | 10.58% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 41
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 617 schools: | 8.34% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 13.21% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Grade 5: | 51.0% | | State average from 746 schools: | 50.40% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 681 schools: | 30.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 123
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 894 schools: | 13.22% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 19.65% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 54.0% | | State average from 961 schools: | 48.86% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 896 schools: | 19.39% |
Female Tested: 56
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 749 schools: | 12.44% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 851 schools: | 20.33% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 55.0% | | State average from 869 schools: | 50.29% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 813 schools: | 19.44% |
Male Tested: 67
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 796 schools: | 15.27% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Grade 5: | 24.0% | | State average from 848 schools: | 19.30% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Grade 5: | 54.0% | | State average from 874 schools: | 47.37% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 807 schools: | 20.50% |
Hispanic Tested: 16
Hispanic Percent Tested: 100%
Hispanic Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 25.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 19.20% |
Hispanic Approaches Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 25.86% |
Hispanic Meets Standards:
| Here: | 44.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 46.24% |
Hispanic Exceeds Standards
| Grade 5: | 13.0% | | State average from 611 schools: | 10.53% |
White Tested: 95
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 8.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 6.97% |
White Approaches Standards
| This school: | 22.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 13.14% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 692 schools: | 52.41% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 668 schools: | 29.07% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 26
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 31.0% | | State average from 428 schools: | 42.74% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 434 schools: | 27.83% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 46.0% | | State average from 418 schools: | 27.12% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 97
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 794 schools: | 9.81% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 921 schools: | 18.65% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 944 schools: | 52.06% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 885 schools: | 21.48% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 60
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 683 schools: | 19.46% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 32.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 26.01% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 53.0% | | State average from 726 schools: | 46.03% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 9.85% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 63
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 670 schools: | 7.86% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 764 schools: | 14.10% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 56.0% | | State average from 782 schools: | 51.28% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 734 schools: | 28.54% |
Grade 4
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 112
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Grade 4: | 4.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 11.69% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| Grade 4: | 18.0% | | State average from 959 schools: | 23.86% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 56.96% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 829 schools: | 9.06% |
Female Tested: 50
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 10.36% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Grade 4: | 22.0% | | State average from 845 schools: | 22.62% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 865 schools: | 59.58% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 724 schools: | 10.99% |
Male Tested: 61
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 25.46% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 54.33% |
White Tested: 91
White Percent Tested: 99%
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 684 schools: | 14.35% |
White Meets Standards:
| This school: | 66.0% | | State average from 704 schools: | 67.26% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 14
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 29.0% | | State average from 459 schools: | 52.95% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 43.0% | | State average from 442 schools: | 32.01% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 98
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 739 schools: | 9.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 938 schools: | 22.84% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Grade 4: | 68.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 60.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 819 schools: | 9.85% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 67
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 17.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 19.0% | | State average from 723 schools: | 32.68% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 63.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 47.45% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 45
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 16.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 15.84% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 69.0% | | State average from 776 schools: | 65.70% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 14.06% |
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 783 schools: | 14.58% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 11.0% | | State average from 663 schools: | 8.92% |
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 5.71% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 647 schools: | 14.58% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 500 schools: | 4.21% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 609 schools: | 6.65% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 112
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 876 schools: | 11.06% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 950 schools: | 16.97% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 57.0% | | State average from 966 schools: | 48.85% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 924 schools: | 24.20% |
Female Tested: 50
Female Percent Tested: 98%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 707 schools: | 11.07% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 837 schools: | 17.42% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Here: | 52.0% | | State average from 864 schools: | 49.82% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 817 schools: | 24.72% |
Male Tested: 61
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 781 schools: | 12.66% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 852 schools: | 17.13% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 884 schools: | 48.00% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 831 schools: | 24.74% |
White Tested: 91
White Percent Tested: 99%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 540 schools: | 6.33% |
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 10.0% | | State average from 664 schools: | 10.61% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 49.48% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 23.0% | | State average from 690 schools: | 35.57% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 14
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 93%
Students With Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 425 schools: | 35.38% |
Students With Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 21.0% | | State average from 444 schools: | 26.31% |
Students With Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Grade 4: | 50.0% | | State average from 437 schools: | 32.88% |
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 98
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 760 schools: | 8.57% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 917 schools: | 15.91% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 954 schools: | 51.18% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 21.0% | | State average from 914 schools: | 26.53% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 67
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 99%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 662 schools: | 15.90% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 714 schools: | 23.16% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 730 schools: | 48.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 675 schools: | 13.53% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 45
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 617 schools: | 7.06% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 736 schools: | 11.47% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 48.97% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 752 schools: | 34.56% |
Grade 6
Writing - 2007
All Students Tested: 96
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 10.96% |
All Students Approaches Standards
| This school: | 19.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 25.11% |
All Students Meets Standards
| Here: | 74.0% | | State average from 806 schools: | 60.39% |
All Students Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 590 schools: | 5.13% |
Female Tested: 56
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 541 schools: | 9.26% |
Female Approaches Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 686 schools: | 23.38% |
Female Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 80.0% | | State average from 705 schools: | 63.79% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 485 schools: | 6.81% |
Male Tested: 40
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 627 schools: | 13.67% |
Male Approaches Standards
| Here: | 28.0% | | State average from 715 schools: | 27.02% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 65.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 57.22% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| This school: | 3.0% | | State average from 431 schools: | 4.85% |
White Tested: 79
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 289 schools: | 2.76% |
White Approaches Standards
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 583 schools: | 15.17% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 81.0% | | State average from 598 schools: | 73.68% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 468 schools: | 8.09% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 86
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards
| This school: | 2.0% | | State average from 595 schools: | 8.23% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards
| This school: | 16.0% | | State average from 773 schools: | 23.66% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards
| Here: | 78.0% | | State average from 791 schools: | 64.92% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 3.0% | | State average from 579 schools: | 5.66% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 55
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards
| Here: | 7.0% | | State average from 524 schools: | 16.64% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 22.0% | | State average from 576 schools: | 34.19% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 67.0% | | State average from 582 schools: | 48.54% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 4.0% | | State average from 259 schools: | 2.27% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 41
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 640 schools: | 17.17% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards
| Here: | 83.0% | | State average from 651 schools: | 70.84% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards
| Here: | 2.0% | | State average from 492 schools: | 8.00% |
Math - 2007
All Students Tested: 96
All Students Percent Tested: 100%
All Students Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 9.0% | | State average from 767 schools: | 18.82% |
All Students Approaches Standards:
| This school: | 20.0% | | State average from 795 schools: | 19.58% |
All Students Meets Standards:
| Here: | 57.0% | | State average from 802 schools: | 46.13% |
All Students Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 727 schools: | 16.52% |
Female Tested: 56
Female Percent Tested: 100%
Female Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 11.0% | | State average from 643 schools: | 16.96% |
Female Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 688 schools: | 20.37% |
Female Meets Standards:
| This school: | 57.0% | | State average from 703 schools: | 47.76% |
Female Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 631 schools: | 17.01% |
Male Tested: 40
Male Percent Tested: 100%
Male Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 8.0% | | State average from 676 schools: | 21.36% |
Male Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 708 schools: | 18.94% |
Male Meets Standards:
| Here: | 58.0% | | State average from 719 schools: | 44.63% |
Male Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 641 schools: | 16.97% |
White Tested: 79
White Percent Tested: 100%
White Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 6.0% | | State average from 542 schools: | 9.54% |
White Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 18.0% | | State average from 581 schools: | 14.05% |
White Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 598 schools: | 52.00% |
White Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 14.0% | | State average from 562 schools: | 25.65% |
Students With Disabilities Tested: 10
Students With Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Tested: 86
Students Without Disabilities Percent Tested: 100%
Students Without Disabilities Falls Below Standards:
| This school: | 6.0% | | State average from 711 schools: | 14.61% |
Students Without Disabilities Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 17.0% | | State average from 775 schools: | 19.32% |
Students Without Disabilities Meets Standards:
| Here: | 62.0% | | State average from 787 schools: | 49.45% |
Students Without Disabilities Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 15.0% | | State average from 717 schools: | 18.22% |
Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 55
Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 13.0% | | State average from 564 schools: | 27.40% |
Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 571 schools: | 24.86% |
Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 53.0% | | State average from 578 schools: | 41.04% |
Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Grade 6: | 15.0% | | State average from 494 schools: | 7.80% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Tested: 41
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Percent Tested: 100%
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Falls Below Standards:
| Here: | 5.0% | | State average from 601 schools: | 11.16% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Approaches Standards:
| Here: | 20.0% | | State average from 636 schools: | 14.92% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Meets Standards:
| Grade 6: | 63.0% | | State average from 649 schools: | 50.64% |
Non-Economically Disadvantaged Exceeds Standards:
| Here: | 12.0% | | State average from 598 schools: | 24.65% |
|
