
Back to: Lakeland, FL, Florida, All US cities.
Discuss this school with others on our active Florida forum.
Citydata.com school rating (using weighted 2010 test average as compared to other schools in Florida) from 0 (worst) to 100 (best) is 61.
2222 EDGEWOOD DR S
Lakeland, FL 33803
Other nearby schools ratings:
South Mckeel Elementary Academy School rating compared to average state, county and city schools ratings:Florida:  45  Polk County:  41  Lakeland:  44  South Mckeel Elementary Academy:  61 
Comment, ask questions, or add new information about this school:
Latest news about schools in Lakeland, FL collected exclusively by citydata.com from local newspapers, TV, and radio stations
Phone: (863) 5100044 (make sure to verify first before calling)
District Number: 53
School number: 1692
School type: Elementary
District Name: POLK
Grade range: KINDERGARTEN TO GRADE 5
Principal: Julie Grice
Regular charter school.
20092010 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  86%  State average from 734 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  83%  State average from 734 schools:  77% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  88%  State average from 734 schools:  85% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  75%  State average from 733 schools:  53% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  74%  State average from 734 schools:  64% 
Making Math GainsHere:  67%  State average from 733 schools:  67% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  63%  State average from 734 schools:  58% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  67%  State average from 734 schools:  66% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  603  State average from 734 schools:  543 
Percent TestedHere:  99%  State average from 733 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2010: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2010: YES
Grade in 2010: A
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  29%  State average from 734 schools:  57% 
Minority RateHere:  28%  State average from 735 schools:  46% 
Region: 4
Title I: NO
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20092010
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 709 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 710 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 108
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  85%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 697
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 637
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 698
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 637
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 507 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 508 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 83
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  87%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 499
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 452
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 500
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 453
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 74 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 74 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 12
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 71
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 74
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 70
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 61
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 69
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 61
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 24
Number of Students Tested in Math: 24
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 24
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 23
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 217 (98%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 218 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  75%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 216
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 198
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 217
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 197
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 12
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 12
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
AYP 20092010  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (97%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 36 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 36
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: NO
20082009 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  91%  State average from 735 schools:  74% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  90%  State average from 734 schools:  76% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  86%  State average from 734 schools:  88% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  75%  State average from 734 schools:  51% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  78%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Making Math GainsSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  72%  State average from 735 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  75%  State average from 735 schools:  65% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  69%  State average from 734 schools:  67% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  636  State average from 734 schools:  557 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 734 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2009: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: NO
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2009: YES
Grade in 2009: A
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  26%  State average from 734 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  28%  State average from 734 schools:  45% 
Region: 4
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20082009
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 265 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 265 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 260
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 255
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 260
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 255
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 194 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 194 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 65
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  92%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 186
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  90%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 189
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 186
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 30 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 30 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 30
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 30
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 14
Number of Students Tested in Math: 14
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 14
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 14
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 5
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 73 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 73 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 22
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 69
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 72
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 69
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20082009  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 10
Number of Students Tested in Math: 10
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 10
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 10
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20072008 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  84%  State average from 711 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  82%  State average from 711 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  90%  State average from 711 schools:  82% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  57%  State average from 711 schools:  47% 
Making Reading Gains Here:  69%  State average from 711 schools:  65% 
Making Math GainsHere:  59%  State average from 711 schools:  70% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading Here:  58%  State average from 711 schools:  62% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  41%  State average from 711 schools:  69% 
Points Earned (Sum of Previous 9 Columns)Here:  540  State average from 711 schools:  544 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 711 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2008: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2008: NO
Improvement of the Lowest 25% in Math: NO
Grade in 2008: B
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  28%  State average from 711 schools:  50% 
Minority RateHere:  31%  State average from 711 schools:  44% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20072008
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 286 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 286 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 87
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  83%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 278
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 281
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 278
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 203 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 203 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 55
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  86%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 199
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  81%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 199
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 199
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 35 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 35 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 13
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 35
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 33
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 22
Number of Students Tested in Math: 22
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 6
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 21
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 20
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 11
Number of Students Tested in Math: 11
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 11
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 11
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 81 (99%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 81 (99%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 30
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  67%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 77
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  71%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 79
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 77
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 7
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 7
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20072008  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 9
Number of Students Tested in Math: 9
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 3
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Reading Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 9
Math Growth Model  Number with Scores: 9
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: B
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
20062007 School Grades
Meeting High Standards in ReadingHere:  86%  State average from 652 schools:  75% 
Meeting High Standards in MathHere:  81%  State average from 652 schools:  73% 
Meeting High Standards in WritingHere:  83%  State average from 652 schools:  83% 
Meeting High Standards in ScienceHere:  63%  State average from 650 schools:  46% 
Making Reading GainsHere:  79%  State average from 652 schools:  72% 
Making Reading Gains  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
Making Math GainsHere:  62%  State average from 652 schools:  68% 
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in ReadingHere:  63%  State average from 652 schools:  67% 
% of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in Reading  2006 3rd Grade FCAT Reading Scores: Excluded
of Lowest 25% Making Learning Gains in MathHere:  61%  State average from 652 schools:  69% 
Points Earned Sum of Previous 9 ColumnsHere:  578  State average from 652 schools:  553 
Percent TestedHere:  100%  State average from 652 schools:  100% 
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Readers Making Learning Gains  2007: YES
50% or More of Lowest 25% of Students Making Learning Gains in Math  2007: YES
Grade in 2007: A
Charter: YES
Free or Reduced Lunch RateHere:  28%  State average from 655 schools:  53% 
Minority RateHere:  28%  State average from 655 schools:  55% 
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) results for school year 20062007
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: TOTAL
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 287 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 287 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  97%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 104
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  84%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  80%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 280
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: WHITE
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 211 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 211 (100%)
Writing Performance Percent ProficientHere:  99%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 81
Performance Improved performance in Writing by 1%: Yes
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  88%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  82%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 205
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: BLACK
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 33 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 33 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 7
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 32
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: HISPANIC
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 23
Number of Students Tested in Math: 23
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 10
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 23
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ASIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 8
Number of Students Tested in Math: 8
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 8
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: AMERICAN INDIAN
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 1
Number of Students Tested in Math: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 1
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 86 (100%)
Number of Students Tested in Math: 86 (100%)
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 25
Reading Proficiency Percent ProficientSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  72%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
51% scoring at or above grade level in Reading: Yes
Math Proficiency Percent ProficientHere:  66%  State average from 27 schools:  59% 
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 83
56% scoring at or above grade level in Math: Yes
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 5
Number of Students Tested in Math: 5
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 1
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 5
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
AYP 20062007  Subgroup: STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES
Number of Students Tested in Reading: 13
Number of Students Tested in Math: 13
Writing Performance Number with Scores: 4
Reading Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
Math Proficiency Number with Scores: 13
SchoolWide Measures 2007 School Grade: A
SchoolWide Measures Adequate Yearly Progress AYP Status: YES
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2010  2011 Results
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1521  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  336  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  6%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  38%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  43%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  91%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1714  State average:  1604 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  342  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  10%  State average:  13% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  26%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  48%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  11%  State average:  11% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  85%  State average:  72% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1815  State average:  1659 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  40%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  90%  State average:  70% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  12  State average:  10 
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1873  State average:  1716 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  312 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  10%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  30%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  37%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  82%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  4  State average:  4 
2010  2011 FCAT Reading Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1883  State average:  1810 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  39%  State average:  33% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  29%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  78%  State average:  65% 
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2
2010  2011 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  345  State average:  321 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  23%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  49%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  20%  State average:  11% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  72%  State average:  51% 
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  8  State average:  7 
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1631  State average:  1481 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  372  State average:  339 
% in each Achievement Level 2
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  29%  State average:  32% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  48%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 5Here:  21%  State average:  16% 
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  98%  State average:  79% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  6  State average:  5 
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1630  State average:  1585 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  330 
% in each Achievement Level 1SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  1%  State average:  10% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  13%  State average:  16% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  45%  State average:  36% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  35%  State average:  26% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  86%  State average:  74% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  7  State average:  6 
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  6  State average:  5 
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  1777  State average:  1674 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  356  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1
% in each Achievement Level 2SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  11%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  33%  State average:  27% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  41%  State average:  28% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  86%  State average:  63% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 6 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1817  State average:  1696 
Mean Scale Score 100500SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  343  State average:  315 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  25% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  12%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  34%  State average:  29% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  28%  State average:  18% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  77%  State average:  55% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2010  2011 FCAT Math Grade 7 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1855  State average:  1786 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  322  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1Here:  11%  State average:  23% 
% in each Achievement Level 2Here:  24%  State average:  20% 
% in each Achievement Level 3Here:  32%  State average:  31% 
% in each Achievement Level 4Here:  27%  State average:  19% 
% in each Achievement Level 5
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and AboveHere:  65%  State average:  57% 
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1572  State average:  1402 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  345  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 4%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 19
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 2
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1767  State average:  1605 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  351  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 05%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 91%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 06
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 03
2009  2010 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  1830  State average:  1656 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  342  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 50%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 16
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2009  2010 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  352  State average:  317 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 20%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 75%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 9
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 10
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 9
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1647  State average:  1476 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  375  State average:  338 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 26%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 30%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1696  State average:  1578 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  355  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 2%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 48%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 92%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2009  2010 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1795  State average:  1675 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  360  State average:  334 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 31%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 8
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 9
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 8
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 8
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2009  2010 Writing Results
2009  2010 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 86
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  4  State average from 27 schools:  59 
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 56%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 13%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 1%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 87%
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  1584  State average:  1396 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  347  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 52%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 90%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 4
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1691  State average:  1582 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  338  State average:  320 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 13%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 40%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 14%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 78%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 5
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 20
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 8
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1762  State average:  1627 
Mean Scale Score 100500SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  330  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 12%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 6
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 11
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 3
2008  209 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  327  State average:  311 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 42%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 15%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 2%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 58%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 14: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 13: 9
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 7
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1639  State average:  1461 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  373  State average:  335 
% in each Achievement Level 2: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 27%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 44%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 27%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 99%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 10
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 6
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 6
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1629  State average:  1563 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  340  State average:  325 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 18%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 15%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 76%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 5
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2008  209 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1719  State average:  1668 
Mean Scale Score 100500SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  344  State average:  333 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 35%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 28%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 72%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 8
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 7
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 7
Florida Comprehensive Assessment Test (FCAT) 2008  2009 NormReferenced Test
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  652  State average from 3241 schools:  633 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  668  State average from 3233 schools:  653 
Median NPRSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  80  State average:  69 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of StudentsSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  110  State average:  101 
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  684  State average from 3309 schools:  667 
Literary (max 18)SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  14  State average:  13 
Initial Understanding (max 12)
Critical Analysis (max 12)
2008  2009 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 87
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  336  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 45%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 7%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 77%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 8
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 12
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 1.5  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 1%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 9%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 6%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 43%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 22%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5.5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 3%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 89%
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  1562  State average:  1342 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  343  State average:  307 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 24%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 41%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 18%
Mean Points Earned Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 83%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Comparisons max 17: 13
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 2: 1
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1646  State average from 1875 schools:  1542 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  331  State average:  313 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 33%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 11%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 82%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 5: 4
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 25: 18
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 17: 12
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1638  State average:  1546 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1507  State average:  1397 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 130
2006  207 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1823  State average from 1873 schools:  1629 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  341  State average:  306 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 3%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 9%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 39%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 19%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 88%
Mean Points Earned Words Phrases max 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Main Idea Purpose max 23: 17
Mean Points Earned Comparisons 9: 7
Mean Points Earned Reference Research max 4: 3
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1823  State average:  1632 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1701  State average:  1532 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Reading 2007  2006: 122
2006  207 FCAT Science Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  338  State average:  303 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 8%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 3%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 63%
Mean Points Earned Physical and Chemical max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Earth and Space max 15: 9
Mean Points Earned Life and Environmental max 12: 8
Mean Points Earned Scientific Thinking max 12: 8
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale ScoreHere:  1605  State average:  1413 
Mean Scale Score 100500SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  366  State average:  324 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 1%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 6%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 36%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 30%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 28%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 93%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 12: 9
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 6
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking 6: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis 7: 5
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1586  State average from 1874 schools:  1525 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  330  State average:  316 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 5%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 17%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 46%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 22%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 9%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 77%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 8: 5
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 7: 5
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 7: 4
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 7: 4
Percent Matched to 2006: 88%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1586  State average:  1528 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006Here:  1529  State average:  1414 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 57
2006  207 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Mean Developmental Scale Score 03000Here:  1731  State average from 1872 schools:  1647 
Mean Scale Score 100500Here:  346  State average:  328 
% in each Achievement Level 1: 7%
% in each Achievement Level 2: 23%
% in each Achievement Level 3: 25%
% in each Achievement Level 4: 38%
% in each Achievement Level 5: 8%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above: 70%
Mean Points Earned Number Sense max 13: 8
Mean Points Earned Measurement max 11: 7
Mean Points Earned Geometry max 13: 7
Mean Points Earned Algebraic Thinking max 11: 6
Mean Points Earned Data Analysis max 12: 7
Percent Matched to 2006: 86%
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2007Here:  1734  State average:  1649 
Mean Developmental Scale Score 2006SOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  1618  State average:  1519 
Mean DSS Change for Matched Students Math 2007  2006: 116
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 90
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  660  State average from 1891 schools:  633 
Median NPR: 81
Literary (max 18): 14
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 10
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 10
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 110
Mean Scale ScoreSOUTH MCKEEL ELEMENTARY ACADEMY:  657  State average from 1874 schools:  642 
Median NPR: 73
Literary (max 18): 12
Informational (max 18): 14
Functional (max 18): 14
Initial Understanding (max 12): 9
Interpretation (max 20): 16
Critical Analysis (max 12): 8
Strategies (max 10): 7
2006  2007 FCAT Reading Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  689  State average from 1870 schools:  667 
Median NPR: 87
Literary (max 18): 15
Informational (max 18): 15
Functional (max 18): 15
Initial Understanding (max 12): 11
Interpretation (max 20): 17
Critical Analysis (max 12): 9
Strategies (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 3 Test Results:
Number of Students: 90
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  657  State average from 1891 schools:  632 
Median NPR: 83
Number Sense (max 14): 12
Operations (max 11): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 5): 4
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 6): 5
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 9
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students: 110
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  666  State average from 1874 schools:  652 
Median NPR: 84
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Math Grade 5 Test Results:
Number of Students: 88
Mean Scale ScoreHere:  683  State average from 1870 schools:  663 
Median NPR: 86
Number Sense (max 12): 10
Operations (max 12): 9
Patterns, Relationships, Algebra (max 6): 5
Data, Statistics, Probability (max 8): 6
Geometry and Measurement (max 10): 8
2006  2007 FCAT Writing Grade 4 Test Results:
Number of Students  Combined: 109
Mean Writing Score 100500  CombinedHere:  313  State average from 27 schools:  59 
% in each Achievement Level 1  Combined: 11%
% in each Achievement Level 2  Combined: 19%
% in each Achievement Level 3  Combined: 55%
% in each Achievement Level 4  Combined: 14%
% in each Achievement Level 5  Combined: 1%
Percent in Achievement Levels 3 and Above  Combined: 70%
Mean Points Earned Focus max 10  Combined: 7
Mean Points Earned Organization max 8  Combined: 5
Mean Points Earned Support max 8  Combined: 6
Mean Points Earned Conventions max 18  Combined: 14
Type of Writing  Combined: Combined
Mean Essay Score by Prompt  Combined
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 2.5  Combined: 2%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3  Combined: 14%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 3.5  Combined: 12%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4  Combined: 48%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 4.5  Combined: 15%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 5  Combined: 7%
Percent Earning Each Score Point 6  Combined: 1%
Percent 3.5 or Above  Combined: 83%
Percent 4.0 or Above  Combined: 71%
